Healing of localized gingival recessions treated with coronally advanced flap alone or combined with either a resorbable collagen matrix or subepithelial connective tissue graft. A preclinical study

被引:20
作者
Sculean, Anton [1 ]
Mihatovic, Ilja [2 ]
Shirakata, Yoshinori [1 ]
Bosshardt, Dieter D. [1 ,3 ]
Schwarz, Frank [2 ]
Iglhaut, Gerhard [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bern, Sch Dent, Dept Periodontol, CH-3010 Bern, Switzerland
[2] Univ Dusseldorf, Dept Oral Surg, Dusseldorf, Germany
[3] Univ Bern, Dept Oral Surg & Stomatol, CH-3010 Bern, Switzerland
[4] George Augusta Univ, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, Gottingen, Germany
关键词
Soft tissue recession; Collagen matrix; Animal study; Coronally advanced flap; Subgingival connective tissue graft; Histology; MILLER CLASS-I; CONTROLLED CLINICAL-TRIAL; DEFECTS; AUGMENTATION;
D O I
10.1007/s00784-014-1299-x
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
To histologically evaluate the effectiveness of a porcine derived collagen matrix (CM) and a subepithelial connective tissue graft (CTG) for coverage of localized gingival recessions. Chronic single Miller Class I-like recessions were created at the buccal at the canines and at the third and fourth premolars in the upper and lower jaws of six beagle dogs. The defects were randomly treated with (1) coronally advanced flap surgery (CAF) + CM, (2) CAF + CTG, or (3) CAF alone. At 12 weeks, histometric measurements were made, e.g., between a reference point (N) - and the gingival margin (GM) - and the outer contour of the adjacent soft tissue (gingival thickness [GT]). The postoperative healing was uneventful in all animals. No complications such as allergic reactions, abscesses or infections were noted throughout the entire study period. All three treatments resulted in coverage of localized gingival recessions. The histological analysis failed to identify any residues of CM or CTG. The histometric measurements revealed comparable outcomes for N-GM and GT values for all three groups (CAF + CM: 1.04 +/- 0.69 mm/0.68 +/- 0.33 mm; CAF + CTG: 1.15 +/- 1.12 mm/0.76 +/- 0.37 mm; CAF: 1.43 +/- 0.45 mm/0.79 +/- 0.24 mm). In the used defect model, the application of CTG or CM in conjunction with CAF did not have an advantage over the use of CAF alone. The use of CAF alone is a valuable option for the treatment localized Miller Class I recessions.
引用
收藏
页码:903 / 909
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Tunnel technique with enamel matrix derivative in addition to subepithelial connective tissue graft compared with connective tissue graft alone for the treatment of multiple gingival recessions: a randomized clinical trial
    Gorski, Bartlomiej
    Gorska, Renata
    Wysokinska-Miszczuk, Joanna
    Kaczynski, Tomasz
    CLINICAL ORAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2020, 24 (12) : 4475 - 4486
  • [22] Evaluation of Subepithelial Connective Tissue Graft Versus Acellular Dermal Matrix with Modified Coronally Advanced Tunnel Technique in Treatment of Multiple Gingival Recessions: A Randomized, Parallel-Design Clinical Trial
    Elmahdi, Fatema
    Reda, Ahmed
    Hosny, Manal
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PERIODONTICS & RESTORATIVE DENTISTRY, 2022, 42 (06) : 741 - 751
  • [23] Clinical evaluation of coronally advanced flap with or without acellular dermal matrix graft on complete defect coverage for the treatment of multiple gingival recessions with thin tissue biotype
    Ahmedbeyli, Cavid
    Ipci, Sebnem Dirikan
    Cakar, Gokser
    Kuru, Bahar E.
    Yilmaz, Selcuk
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY, 2014, 41 (03) : 303 - 310
  • [24] Analysis of the treatment of RT2 recessions with a xenogeneic collagen matrix vs. connective tissue graft combined with a coronally advanced flap. A double-blinded randomized clinical trial
    Ruiz-de-Gopegui-Palacios, Elena
    Vilor-Fernandez, Miren
    Garcia-De-La-Fuente, Ana-Maria
    Marichalar-Mendia, Xabier
    Aguirre-Zorzano, Luis-Antonio
    CLINICAL ORAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2024, 28 (04)
  • [25] Tunnel/Pouch versus Coronally Advanced Flap Combined with a Connective Tissue Graft for the Treatment of Maxillary Gingival Recessions: Four-Year Follow-Up of a Randomized Controlled Trial
    Salem, Souheil
    Salhi, Leila
    Seidel, Laurence
    Lecloux, Geoffrey
    Rompen, Eric
    Lambert, France
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2020, 9 (08) : 1 - 14
  • [26] Treatment of multiple adjacent maxillary Miller Class I, II, and III gingival recessions with the modified coronally advanced tunnel, enamel matrix derivative, and subepithelial connective tissue graft: A report of 12 cases
    Sculean, Anton
    Cosgarea, Raluca
    Stahli, Alexandra
    Katsaros, Christos
    Arweiler, Nicole Birgit
    Miron, Richard John
    Deppe, Herbert
    QUINTESSENCE INTERNATIONAL, 2016, 47 (08): : 653 - 659
  • [27] Treatment of Localized Gingival Recession with a Modified Laterally Positioned Flap Combined with Subepithelial Connective Tissue Graft-A Case Report
    Verma, Harshita
    Lele, Priya
    Dodwad, Vidya
    Shikarkhane, Vangmayee
    Bhatt, Niket
    JOURNAL OF YOUNG PHARMACISTS, 2023, 15 (04) : 760 - 763
  • [28] Coronally advanced flap achieved higher esthetic outcomes without a connective tissue graft for the treatment of single gingival recessions: a 4-year randomized clinical trial
    Gil, Stephany
    de la Rosa, Manuel
    Mancini, Evelyn
    Dias, Antonio
    Barootchi, Shayan
    Tavelli, Lorenzo
    Mendoza-azpur, Gerardo
    CLINICAL ORAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2021, 25 (05) : 2727 - 2735
  • [29] Effect of enamel matrix derivative on wound healing following gingival recession coverage using the modified coronally advanced tunnel and subepithelial connective tissue graft: a randomised, controlled, clinical study
    Stahli, Alexandra
    Imber, Jean-Claude
    Raptis, Elena
    Salvi, Giovanni E.
    Eick, Sigrun
    Sculean, Anton
    CLINICAL ORAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2020, 24 (02) : 1043 - 1051
  • [30] Acellular dermal matrix allograft versus subepithelial connective tissue graft in treatment of gingival recessions: a 5-year randomized clinical study
    Moslemi, Neda
    Jazi, Mahvash Mousavi
    Haghighati, Farideh
    Morovati, Seyyedeh Pouya
    Jamali, Raika
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY, 2011, 38 (12) : 1122 - 1129