Relevance of assessment items in community paramedicine home visit programmes: results of a modified Delphi study

被引:1
作者
Leyenaar, Matthew S. [1 ,2 ]
Allana, Amir [3 ]
Sinha, Samir K. [4 ,5 ]
Nolan, Michael [6 ]
Agarwal, Gina [7 ]
Tavares, Walter [3 ,8 ,9 ]
Costa, Andrew P. [1 ]
机构
[1] McMaster Univ, Dept Hlth Res Methods Evidence & Impact, Hamilton, ON, Canada
[2] Prince Edward Isl Dept Hlth & Wellness, Emergency Hlth Serv, Charlottetown, PE, Canada
[3] Univ Toronto, Inst Hlth Policy Management & Evaluat, Fac Med, Toronto, ON, Canada
[4] Sinai Hlth Syst, Geriatr Med, Toronto, ON, Canada
[5] Univ Toronto, Fac Med, Toronto, ON, Canada
[6] Cty Renfrew, Paramed Serv, Pembroke, ON, Canada
[7] McMaster Univ, Family Med, Hamilton, ON, Canada
[8] Univ Toronto, Wilson Ctr, Fac Med, Toronto, ON, Canada
[9] Univ Toronto, Post MD Educ, Fac Med, Toronto, ON, Canada
来源
BMJ OPEN | 2021年 / 11卷 / 11期
关键词
CARE; CONSENSUS;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2020-048504
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective Guidelines for a structured assessment in community paramedicine home visit programmes have not been established and evidence to inform their creation is lacking. We sought to investigate the relevance of assessment items to the practice of community paramedics according to a pre-established clarity-utility matrix. Design We designed a modified-Delphi study consisting of predetermined thresholds for achieving consensus, number of rounds of for scoring items, a defined meeting and discussion process, and a sample of participants that was purposefully representative. Setting and participants We established a panel of 26 community paramedics representing 20 municipal paramedic services in Ontario, Canada. The sample represented a majority of paramedic services within the province that were operating a community paramedicine home visit programme. Measures Drawing from a bank of standardised assessment items grouped according to domains aligned with the International Classification on Functioning, Disability, and Health taxonomy, 64 previously pilot-tested assessment items were scored according to their clarity (being free from ambiguity and easy to understand) and utility (being valued in care planning or case management activities). Assessment items covered a broad range of health, social and environmental domains. To conclude scoring rounds, assessment items that did not achieve consensus for relevance to assessment practices were discussed among participants with opportunities to modify assessment items for subsequent rounds of scoring. Results Resulting from the first round of scoring, 54 assessment items were identified as being relevant to assessment practices and 3 assessment items were removed from subsequent rounds. The remaining 7 assessment items were modified, with some parts removed from the final items that achieved consensus in the final rounds of scoring. Conclusion A broadly representative panel of community paramedics identified consensus for 61 assessment items that could be included in a structured, multidomain, assessment instrument for guiding practice in community paramedicine home visit programmes.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 27 条
  • [11] Heckman G., 2013, Can Geriatr Soc J CME, V3, P8
  • [12] Hsu CC, 2007, PRACTICAL ASSESS RES, V12, P1
  • [13] Development of sustainable community paramedicine programmes: a case study in Pennsylvania
    Huang, Yuan-Han
    Ma, Linlin
    Sabljak, Luke A.
    Puhala, Zachary A.
    [J]. EMERGENCY MEDICINE JOURNAL, 2018, 35 (06) : 372 - 378
  • [14] Consensus on paramedic clinical decisions during high-acuity emergency calls: results of a Canadian Delphi study
    Jensen, Jan L.
    Croskerry, Pat
    Travers, Andrew H.
    [J]. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2011, 13 (05) : 310 - 318
  • [15] Guidance on Conducting and REporting DElphi Studies (CREDES) in palliative care: Recommendations based on a methodological systematic review
    Juenger, Saskia
    Payne, Sheila A.
    Brine, Jenny
    Radbruch, Lukas
    Brearley, Sarah G.
    [J]. PALLIATIVE MEDICINE, 2017, 31 (08) : 684 - 706
  • [16] Leyenaar M., 2018, IR J PARAMED, V3, P1, DOI DOI 10.32378/IJP.V3I1.76
  • [17] Paramedics assessing patients with complex comorbidities in community settings: results from the CARPE study
    Leyenaar, Matthew S.
    McLeod, Brent
    Jones, Aaron
    Brousseau, Audrey-Anne
    Mercier, Eric
    Strum, Ryan P.
    Nolan, Michael
    Sinha, Samir K.
    Agarwal, Gina
    Tavares, Walter
    Costa, Andrew P.
    [J]. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2021, 23 (06) : 828 - 836
  • [18] Examining consensus for a standardised patient assessment in community paramedicine home visits: a RAND/UCLA-modified Delphi Study
    Leyenaar, Matthew S.
    Strum, Ryan P.
    Batt, Alan M.
    Sinha, Samir
    Nolan, Michael
    Agarwal, Gina
    Tavares, Walter
    Costa, Andrew P.
    [J]. BMJ OPEN, 2019, 9 (10):
  • [19] What do community paramedics assess? An environmental scan and content analysis of patient assessment in community paramedicine
    Leyenaar, Matthew S.
    McLeod, Brent
    Penhearow, Sarah
    Strum, Ryan
    Brydges, Madison
    Mercier, Eric
    Brousseau, Audrey-Anne
    Besserer, Floyd
    Agarwal, Gina
    Tavares, Walter
    Costa, Andrew P.
    [J]. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2019, 21 (06) : 766 - 775
  • [20] Leyenaar MS., 2019, ONTARIO COMMUNITY PA