Relevance of assessment items in community paramedicine home visit programmes: results of a modified Delphi study

被引:1
作者
Leyenaar, Matthew S. [1 ,2 ]
Allana, Amir [3 ]
Sinha, Samir K. [4 ,5 ]
Nolan, Michael [6 ]
Agarwal, Gina [7 ]
Tavares, Walter [3 ,8 ,9 ]
Costa, Andrew P. [1 ]
机构
[1] McMaster Univ, Dept Hlth Res Methods Evidence & Impact, Hamilton, ON, Canada
[2] Prince Edward Isl Dept Hlth & Wellness, Emergency Hlth Serv, Charlottetown, PE, Canada
[3] Univ Toronto, Inst Hlth Policy Management & Evaluat, Fac Med, Toronto, ON, Canada
[4] Sinai Hlth Syst, Geriatr Med, Toronto, ON, Canada
[5] Univ Toronto, Fac Med, Toronto, ON, Canada
[6] Cty Renfrew, Paramed Serv, Pembroke, ON, Canada
[7] McMaster Univ, Family Med, Hamilton, ON, Canada
[8] Univ Toronto, Wilson Ctr, Fac Med, Toronto, ON, Canada
[9] Univ Toronto, Post MD Educ, Fac Med, Toronto, ON, Canada
来源
BMJ OPEN | 2021年 / 11卷 / 11期
关键词
CARE; CONSENSUS;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2020-048504
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective Guidelines for a structured assessment in community paramedicine home visit programmes have not been established and evidence to inform their creation is lacking. We sought to investigate the relevance of assessment items to the practice of community paramedics according to a pre-established clarity-utility matrix. Design We designed a modified-Delphi study consisting of predetermined thresholds for achieving consensus, number of rounds of for scoring items, a defined meeting and discussion process, and a sample of participants that was purposefully representative. Setting and participants We established a panel of 26 community paramedics representing 20 municipal paramedic services in Ontario, Canada. The sample represented a majority of paramedic services within the province that were operating a community paramedicine home visit programme. Measures Drawing from a bank of standardised assessment items grouped according to domains aligned with the International Classification on Functioning, Disability, and Health taxonomy, 64 previously pilot-tested assessment items were scored according to their clarity (being free from ambiguity and easy to understand) and utility (being valued in care planning or case management activities). Assessment items covered a broad range of health, social and environmental domains. To conclude scoring rounds, assessment items that did not achieve consensus for relevance to assessment practices were discussed among participants with opportunities to modify assessment items for subsequent rounds of scoring. Results Resulting from the first round of scoring, 54 assessment items were identified as being relevant to assessment practices and 3 assessment items were removed from subsequent rounds. The remaining 7 assessment items were modified, with some parts removed from the final items that achieved consensus in the final rounds of scoring. Conclusion A broadly representative panel of community paramedics identified consensus for 61 assessment items that could be included in a structured, multidomain, assessment instrument for guiding practice in community paramedicine home visit programmes.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 27 条
  • [1] AMB, 2019, Anunci de l'area metropolitana de Barcelona Exp. 107/19, P1
  • [2] Relationship between interRAI HC and the ICF: opportunity for operationalizing the ICF
    Berg, Katherine
    Finne-Soveri, Harriet
    Gray, Len
    Henrard, Jean Claude
    Hirdes, John
    Ikegami, Naoki
    Ljunggren, Gunnar
    Morris, John N.
    Paquay, Louis
    Resnik, Linda
    Teare, Gary
    [J]. BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2009, 9
  • [3] Carpenter I., 2013, USING INTERRAI ASSES, DOI 10.1787/9789264194564-7-en
  • [4] Community paramedicine: A systematic review of program descriptions and training
    Chan, Joyce
    Griffith, Lauren E.
    Costa, Andrew P.
    Leyenaar, Matthew S.
    Agarwal, Gina
    [J]. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2019, 21 (06) : 749 - 761
  • [5] Mobile Integrated Health Care and Community Paramedicine: An Emerging Emergency Medical Services Concept
    Choi, Bryan Y.
    Blumberg, Charles
    Williams, Kenneth
    [J]. ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2016, 67 (03) : 361 - 366
  • [6] Colbeck MA, 2018, IRISH J PARAMED, V3, P1, DOI DOI 10.32378/IJP.V3I2.91
  • [7] The implementation and usability of HIRAID, a structured approach to emergency nursing assessment
    Curtis, Kate
    Munroe, Belinda
    Van, Connie
    Elphick, Tiana-Lee
    [J]. AUSTRALASIAN EMERGENCY CARE, 2020, 23 (01) : 62 - 70
  • [8] The emergency nursing assessment process-A structured framework for a systematic approach
    Curtis, Kate
    Murphy, Margaret
    Hoy, Sarah
    Lewis, Melinda J.
    [J]. AUSTRALASIAN EMERGENCY NURSING JOURNAL, 2009, 12 (04) : 130 - 136
  • [9] Defining consensus: A systematic review recommends methodologic criteria for reporting of Delphi studies
    Diamond, Ivan R.
    Grant, Robert C.
    Feldman, Brian M.
    Pencharz, Paul B.
    Ling, Simon C.
    Moore, Aideen M.
    Wales, Paul W.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2014, 67 (04) : 401 - 409
  • [10] Sharing clinical information across care settings: the birth of an integrated assessment system
    Gray, Leonard C.
    Berg, Katherine
    Fries, Brant E.
    Henrard, Jean-Claude
    Hirdes, John P.
    Steel, Knight
    Morris, John N.
    [J]. BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2009, 9