Detection of Cryptosporidium oocysts in fresh and frozen cattle faeces:: comparison of three methods

被引:20
作者
Brook, E. J. [1 ,2 ]
Christley, R. M. [1 ]
French, N. P. [3 ]
Hart, C. A. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Liverpool, Dept Vet Clin Sci, Neston, England
[2] Univ Liverpool, Dept Med Microbiol & Genitourinary Med, Liverpool L69 3BX, Merseyside, England
[3] Massey Univ, Inst Vet Anim & Biomed Sci, EpiCtr, Palmerston North, New Zealand
关键词
cattle; Cryptosporidium; ROC; sensitivity; specificity;
D O I
10.1111/j.1472-765X.2007.02257.x
中图分类号
Q81 [生物工程学(生物技术)]; Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 0836 ; 090102 ; 100705 ;
摘要
Aims: The aim of this study was to compare the performance of three commonly used screening tests for Cryptosporidium oocysts in fresh and frozen cattle faeces. Methods and Results: Twenty-nine freshly voided faecal samples were collected from calves from three farms in the northwest of England. Three diagnostic tests for Cryptosporidium were carried out on each sample both before and after freezing - the modified Ziehl-Neelsen (MZN) and auramine phenol (APh) stains and a commercial enzyme immunoassay (EIA) kit, the ProSpecT Cryptosporidium Microplate assay (Remel, Lenexa, KS). Twelve samples were deemed positive by the reference standard (polymerase chain reaction, PCR). There were some discrepancies between the results of the screening tests and the levels of agreement were quantified. The sensitivity and specificity of each method was determined, with PCR as the gold standard. Sensitivity and specificity of the MZN stain was optimized when samples with fewer than two oocyst-like bodies were classified as negative. Conclusions: All three screening methods used were effective in detecting Cryptosporidium infection in both fresh and frozen calf faeces. Significance and Impact of the Study: This study has highlighted the value of determining characteristics of tests used for diagnosis and epidemiological studies.
引用
收藏
页码:26 / 31
页数:6
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]   COMPARISON OF THE PROSPECT AND COLOR-VUE ENZYME-LINKED IMMUNOASSAYS FOR THE DETECTION OF CRYPTOSPORIDIUM IN STOOL SPECIMENS [J].
AARNAES, SL ;
BLANDING, J ;
SPEIER, S ;
FORTHAL, D ;
DELAMAZA, LM ;
PETERSON, EM .
DIAGNOSTIC MICROBIOLOGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASE, 1994, 19 (04) :221-225
[2]  
BAXBY D, 1983, LANCET, V2, P1149
[3]   Comparison of fluorescence, antigen and PCR assays to detect Cryptosporidium parvum in fecal specimens [J].
Bialek, R ;
Binder, N ;
Dietz, K ;
Joachim, A ;
Knobloch, J ;
Zelck, UE .
DIAGNOSTIC MICROBIOLOGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASE, 2002, 43 (04) :283-288
[4]   LABORATORY DIAGNOSIS OF CRYPTOSPORIDIOSIS [J].
CASEMORE, DP ;
ARMSTRONG, M ;
SANDS, RL .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY, 1985, 38 (12) :1337-1341
[5]   LABORATORY METHODS FOR DIAGNOSING CRYPTOSPORIDIOSIS [J].
CASEMORE, DP .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY, 1991, 44 (06) :445-451
[6]   Prevalence of and risk factors involved in the spread of neonatal bovine cryptosporidiosis in Galicia (NW Spain) [J].
Castro-Hermida, JA ;
González-Losada, YA ;
Ares-Mazás, E .
VETERINARY PARASITOLOGY, 2002, 106 (01) :1-10
[7]   A study of cryptosporidiosis in a cohort of neonatal calves [J].
Castro-Hermida, JA ;
González-Losada, YA ;
Mezo-Menéndez, M ;
Ares-Mazás, E .
VETERINARY PARASITOLOGY, 2002, 106 (01) :11-17
[8]   An outbreak of Cryptosporidium hominis infection at an Illinois recreational waterpark [J].
Causer, LM ;
Handzel, T ;
Welch, P ;
Carr, M ;
Culp, D ;
Lucht, R ;
Mudahar, K ;
Robinson, D ;
Neavear, E ;
Fenton, S ;
Rose, C ;
Craig, L ;
Arrowood, M ;
Wahlquist, S ;
Xiao, L ;
Lee, YM ;
Mirel, L ;
Levy, D ;
Beach, MJ ;
Poquette, G ;
Dworkin, MS .
EPIDEMIOLOGY AND INFECTION, 2006, 134 (01) :147-156
[9]   Validation of molecular-diagnostic techniques in the parasitological laboratory [J].
Conraths, FJ ;
Schares, G .
VETERINARY PARASITOLOGY, 2006, 136 (02) :91-98
[10]  
Dohoo I., 2009, VET EPIDEMIOLOGIC RE, V2nd