Quantification of prostate deformation due to needle insertion during TRUS-guided biopsy: Comparison of hand-held and mechanically stabilized systems

被引:17
作者
De Silva, Tharindu [1 ,2 ]
Fenster, Aaron [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Bax, Jeffrey [1 ,2 ]
Romagnoli, Cesare [4 ]
Izawa, Jonathan [4 ]
Samarabandu, Jagath [5 ]
Ward, Aaron D. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Western Ontario, Imaging Res Labs, Robarts Res Inst, London, ON N6A 5K8, Canada
[2] Univ Western Ontario, Biomed Engn Grad Program, London, ON N6A 5B9, Canada
[3] Univ Western Ontario, Dept Med Biophys, London, ON N6A 5C1, Canada
[4] Univ Western Ontario, London Hlth Sci Ctr, Div Urol, Dept Surg & Oncol, London, ON N6A 5C1, Canada
[5] Univ Western Ontario, Dept Elect & Comp Engn, London, ON N6A 5B9, Canada
基金
加拿大健康研究院;
关键词
targeted prostate biopsy; tissue displacement; deformation quantification; needle insertion; biopsy gun firing; REGISTRATION; ACCURACY; CANCER; DESIGN;
D O I
10.1118/1.3557883
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: Prostate biopsy is the clinical standard for the definitive diagnosis of prostate cancer. To overcome the limitations of 2D TRUS-guided biopsy systems when targeting preplanned locations, systems have been developed with 3D guidance to improve the accuracy of cancer detection. Prostate deformation due to needle insertion and biopsy gun firing is a potential source of error that can cause target misalignments during biopsies. Methods: The authors used nonrigid registration of 2D TRUS images to quantify the deformation that occurs during the needle insertion and the biopsy gun firing procedure and compare this effect in biopsies performed using a hand-held TRUS probe to those performed using a mechanically assisted 3D TRUS-guided biopsy system. The authors calculated a spatially varying 95% confidence interval on the prostate tissue motion and analyzed this motion both as a function of distance to the biopsy needle and as a function of distance to the lower piercing point of the prostate. The former is relevant because biopsy targets lie along the needle axis, and the latter is of particular importance due to the reported high concentration of prostate cancer in the peripheral zone, a substantial portion of which lies on the posterior side of the prostate where biopsy needles enter the prostate after penetrating the rectal wall during transrectal biopsy. Results: The results show that for both systems, the tissue deformation is such that throughout the length of the needle axis, including regions proximal to the lower piercing point, spherical tumors with a radius of 2.1 mm or more can be sampled with 95% confidence under the assumption of zero error elsewhere in the biopsy system. More deformation was observed in the direction orthogonal to the needle axis compared to the direction parallel to the needle axis; this is of particular importance given the long, narrow shape of the biopsy core. The authors measured lateral tissue motion proximal to the needle axis of not more than 1.5 mm, with 95% confidence. The authors observed a statistically significant and clinically insignificant maximum difference of 0.38 mm in the deformation, resulting from the hand-held and mechanically assisted systems along the needle axis, and the mechanical system resulted in a lower relative increase in deformation proximal to the needle axis during needle insertion, as well as lower variability of deformation during biopsy gun firing. Conclusions: Given the clinical need to biopsy tumors of volume greater than or equal to 0.5 cm(3), corresponding to spherical tumors with a radius of 5 mm or more, the tissue motion induced by needle insertion and gun firing is an important consideration when setting the design specifications for TRUS-guided prostate biopsy systems. (C) 2011 American Association of Physicists in Medicine. [DOI: 10.1118/1.3557883]
引用
收藏
页码:1718 / 1731
页数:14
相关论文
共 22 条
  • [1] Altekruse S, 2009, SEER CANC STAT REV, P1975
  • [2] [Anonymous], 1997, PHYS CHEMESTRY EMGIN, DOI DOI 10.1121/1.418074
  • [3] [Anonymous], CAN CANC STAT
  • [4] Mechanically assisted 3D ultrasound guided prostate biopsy system
    Bax, Jeffrey
    Cool, Derek
    Gardi, Lori
    Knight, Kerry
    Smith, David
    Montreuil, Jacques
    Sherebrin, Shi
    Romagnoli, Cesare
    Fenster, Aaron
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2008, 35 (12) : 5397 - 5410
  • [5] Design and evaluation of a 3D transrectal ultrasound prostate biopsy system
    Cool, Derek
    Sherebrin, Shi
    Izawa, Jonathan
    Chin, Joseph
    Fenster, Aaron
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2008, 35 (10) : 4695 - 4707
  • [6] Repeat Prostate Biopsy Accuracy: Simulator-based Comparison of Two- and Three-dimensional Transrectal US Modalities
    Cool, Derek W.
    Connolly, Michael J.
    Sherebrin, Shi
    Eagleson, Roy
    Izawa, Jonathan I.
    Amann, Justin
    Romagnoli, Cesare
    Romano, Walter M.
    Fenster, Aaron
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2010, 254 (02) : 587 - 594
  • [7] De Silva T, 2010, LECT NOTES COMPUT SC, V6363, P213
  • [8] Utility of saturation biopsy to predict insignificant cancer at radical prostatectomy
    Epstein, JI
    Sanderson, H
    Carter, HB
    Scharfstein, DO
    [J]. UROLOGY, 2005, 66 (02) : 356 - 360
  • [9] Predicting error in rigid-body point-based registration
    Fitzpatrick, JM
    West, JB
    Maurer, CR
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MEDICAL IMAGING, 1998, 17 (05) : 694 - 702
  • [10] Cell proliferation, apoptosis, oncogene, and tumor suppressor gene status in adenosis with comparison to benign prostatic hyperplasia, prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia, and cancer
    Häussler, O
    Epstein, JI
    Amin, MB
    Heitz, PU
    Hailemariam, S
    [J]. HUMAN PATHOLOGY, 1999, 30 (09) : 1077 - 1086