Non-invasive determination of transcatheter pressure gradient in stenotic aortic valves: An analytical model

被引:4
作者
Keshavarz-Motamed, Zahra [1 ,2 ]
Motamed, Pouyan K. [3 ]
Maftoon, Nima [4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] MIT, Inst Med Engn & Sci, Cambridge, MA 02139 USA
[2] MIT, Harvard MIT Div Hlth Sci & Technol, Cambridge, MA 02139 USA
[3] Univ Guilan, Dept Engn Mech, Rasht, Iran
[4] Harvard Univ, Sch Med, Boston, MA USA
[5] McGill Univ, Dept Biomed Engn, Montreal, PQ, Canada
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
Analytical model; Pressure gradient; Aortic stenosis; Fluid dynamics; In vitro; STENOSIS;
D O I
10.1016/j.medengphy.2015.01.003
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
Aortic stenosis (AS), in which the opening of the aortic valve is narrowed, is the most common valvular heart disease. Cardiac catheterization is considered the reference standard for definitive evaluation of AS severity, based on instantaneous systolic value of transvalvular pressure gradient (TPG). However, using invasive cardiac catheterization might carry high risks knowing that undergoing multiple cardiac catheterizations for follow-up in patients with AS is common. The objective of this study was to suggest an analytical description of the AS that estimates TPG without a need for high risk invasive data collection. For this purpose, Navier-Stokes equation coupled with the elastic-deformation equation was solved analytically. The estimated TPG resulted from the suggested analytical description was validated against published in vivo and in vitro measurement data. Very good concordances were found between TPG obtained from the analytical formulation and in vivo (maximum root mean square error: 3.8 mmHg) and in vitro (maximum root mean square error: 9.4 mmHg). The analytical description can be integrated to non-invasive imaging modalities to estimate AS severity as an alternative to cardiac catheterization to help preventing its risks in patients with AS. (C) 2015 IPEM. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:321 / 327
页数:7
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2011, EXP FLUIDS, DOI DOI 10.1007/s00348-009-0781-8
[2]   Overestimation of catheter gradients by Doppler ultrasound in patients with aortic stenosis: A predictable manifestation of pressure recovery [J].
Baumgartner, H ;
Stefenelli, T ;
Niederberger, J ;
Schima, H ;
Maurer, G .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 1999, 33 (06) :1655-1661
[3]  
Caro C. G., 2012, The Mechanics of the Circulation
[4]   Reference Values and Distribution of Conventional Echocardiographic Doppler Measures and Longitudinal Tissue Doppler Velocities in a Population Free From Cardiovascular Disease [J].
Dalen, Havard ;
Thorstensen, Anders ;
Vatten, Lars J. ;
Aase, Svein A. ;
Stoylen, Asbjorn .
CIRCULATION-CARDIOVASCULAR IMAGING, 2010, 3 (05) :614-U165
[5]  
Fung Y.C., 1984, Biodynamics Circulation
[6]  
Fung Y.C., 1981, Mechanical Properties Of Living Tissues
[7]   Analytical modeling of the instantaneous pressure gradient across the aortic valve [J].
Garcia, D ;
Pibarot, P ;
Durand, LG .
JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICS, 2005, 38 (06) :1303-1311
[8]   Analytical modeling of the instantaneous maximal transvalvular pressure gradient in aortic stenosis [J].
Garcia, Damien ;
Kadem, Lyes ;
Savery, David ;
Pibarot, Philippe ;
Durand, Louise-Gilles .
JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICS, 2006, 39 (16) :3036-3044
[9]   Impact of systemic hypertension on the assessment of aortic stenosis [J].
Kadem, L ;
Dumesnil, JG ;
Rieu, R ;
Durand, LG ;
Garcia, D ;
Pibarot, P .
HEART, 2005, 91 (03) :354-361
[10]   A new approach for the evaluation of the severity of coarctation of the aorta using Doppler velocity index and effective orifice area: In vitro validation and clinical implications [J].
Keshavarz-Motamed, Z. ;
Garcia, J. ;
Maftoon, N. ;
Bedard, E. ;
Chetaille, P. ;
Kadem, L. .
JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICS, 2012, 45 (07) :1239-1245