General movements assessment and Alberta Infant Motor Scale in neurodevelopmental outcome of preterm infants

被引:8
|
作者
Yildirim, Canan [1 ,6 ]
Asalioglu, Aysegul [2 ]
Coskun, Yesim [3 ]
Acar, Gonul [4 ]
Akman, Pek [5 ]
机构
[1] Okan Univ, Fac Med, Dept Pediat, Div Pediat Neurol, Istanbul, Turkey
[2] Istinye Univ, Fac Hlth Sci, Dept Physiotherapy & Rehabil, Istanbul, Turkey
[3] Koc Univ Hosp, Dept Pediat, Istanbul, Turkey
[4] Marmara Univ, Fac Hlth Sci, Dept Physiotherapy & Rehabil, Istanbul, Turkey
[5] Bilim Univ, Fac Med, Dept Pediat, Div Neonatal, Istanbul, Turkey
[6] Okan Univ, Fac Med, Dept Pediat, Dept Pediat Neurol, TR-34959 Istanbul, Turkey
关键词
alberta Infant Motor Scale; cerebral palsy; general movement assessment optimality score; motor optimality score; preterm infants; CEREBRAL-PALSY; 1ST YEAR; CHILDREN; TERM;
D O I
10.1016/j.pedneo.2022.06.002
中图分类号
R72 [儿科学];
学科分类号
100202 ;
摘要
Aim: We aimed to compare the General Movement Assessment (GMA) and the Alberta Infant Motor Scale (AIMS) in preterm infants for the prediction of cerebral palsy (CP) and neurodeve-lopmental delay (NDD). Additionally, we aimed to evaluate the diagnostic compatibility of the General Movement Optimality Score (GMOS), the Motor Optimality Score (MOS), and AIMS for detecting CP and NDD.Method: Seventy-five preterm infants with gestational age (GA) 24-37 weeks were enrolled. Group 1 was composed of infants with 24-28 GA (n = 22); groups 2 and 3 consisted of infants with 29-32 GA weeks (n = 23) and 33-37 GA (n = 30) weeks, respectively. The infants were assessed during the writhing period, the fidgety period, and at 6-12 months of corrected age with GMOS, MOS, and AIMS, respectively.Results: In the writhing period, a cramped-synchronized pattern was observed in 17 (22%) in-fants, whereas a poor repertoire pattern was observed in 34 (45%) infants. In the fidgety period of the 63 infants, 29 (46%) presented with fidgety movements absent. The MOS and AIMS scores of the infants in group 1 were significantly lower than the other groups, which were statisti-cally significant (p = 0.004, p<0.00 1). High and positive compatibility (Kappa coefficient: 0.709; p = 0.001) was found between AIMS and GMOS scores and between AIMS and MOS scores (Kappa coefficient: 0.804; p < 0.001). In all groups, a statistically significant association was found between total GMOS scores (p = 0.003) and the presence of fidgety movements (p = 0.003). GMOS, MOS, and AIMS were found to be associated with CP and NDD (p < 0.001).Conclusion: GMA is an important tool for the prediction of CP and NDD. The combined use of GMOS, MOS, and AIMS may guide the clinical practice for the valid and reliable diagnosis of CP and NDD.Copyright 2022, Taiwan Pediatric Association. Published by Elsevier Taiwan LLC. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/ by-nc-nd/4.0/).
引用
收藏
页码:535 / 541
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Assessment of general movements and heart rate variability in prediction of neurodevelopmental outcome in preterm infants
    Dimitrijevic, Lidija
    Bjelakovic, Bojko
    Colovic, Hristina
    Mikov, Aleksandra
    Zivkovic, Vesna
    Kocic, Mirjana
    Lukic, Stevo
    EARLY HUMAN DEVELOPMENT, 2016, 99 : 7 - 12
  • [2] Predictive value of the General Movements Assessment and Standardized Infant NeuroDevelopmental Assessment in infants at high risk of neurodevelopmental disorders
    Hadders-Algra, Mijna
    Tacke, Uta
    Pietz, Joachim
    Rupp, Andre
    Philippi, Heike
    DEVELOPMENTAL MEDICINE AND CHILD NEUROLOGY, 2024, 66 (10) : 1361 - 1368
  • [3] In extremely preterm infants, do the Movement Assessment of Infants and the Alberta Infant Motor Scale predict 18-month outcomes using the Bayley-III?
    Lefebvre, Francine
    Gagnon, Marie-Michele
    Luu, Thuy Mai
    Lupien, Genevieve
    Dorval, Veronique
    EARLY HUMAN DEVELOPMENT, 2016, 94 : 13 - 17
  • [4] Predictive value of neurodevelopmental assessment versus evaluation of general movements for motor outcome in preterm infants with birth weights &lt;1500g
    Stahimann, N.
    Haertel, C.
    Knopp, A.
    Gehring, B.
    Kiecksee, H.
    Thyen, U.
    NEUROPEDIATRICS, 2007, 38 (02) : 91 - 99
  • [5] Assessment of motor development using the Alberta Infant Motor Scale in full-term infants
    Kepenek-Varol, Busra
    Hosbay, Zeynep
    Varol, Selcuk
    Torun, Emel
    TURKISH JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICS, 2020, 62 (01) : 94 - 102
  • [6] Preterm infant general movements assessment via representation learning
    Gong, Xiaohui
    Li, Xiao
    Ma, Li
    Tong, Weilin
    Shi, Fangyu
    Hu, Menghan
    Zhang, Xiao-Ping
    Yu, Guangjun
    Yang, Cheng
    DISPLAYS, 2022, 75
  • [7] General movements and neurodevelopmental outcome at 6 years in extremely preterm born children
    Lonnberg, Piia
    Metsaranta, Marjo
    Rajantie, Irmeli
    Haajanen, Ritva
    Wolford, Elina
    Lano, Aulikki
    EARLY HUMAN DEVELOPMENT, 2025, 201
  • [8] Is it possible to predict the infant's neurodevelopmental outcome at 14 months of age by means of a single preterm assessment of General Movements?
    Manacero, Sonia Aparecida
    Marschik, Peter B.
    Nunes, Magda Lahorgue
    Einspieler, Christa
    EARLY HUMAN DEVELOPMENT, 2012, 88 (01) : 39 - 43
  • [9] Accuracy of the Alberta Infant Motor Scale (AIMS) to detect developmental delay of gross motor skills in preterm infants: A systematic review
    de Albuquerque, Plinio Luna
    Lemos, Andrea
    de Farias Guerra, Miriam Queiroz
    Eickmann, Sophie Helena
    DEVELOPMENTAL NEUROREHABILITATION, 2015, 18 (01) : 15 - 21
  • [10] Neurobehavioral assessment as a predictor of neurodevelopmental outcome in preterm infants
    El-Dib, M.
    Massaro, A. N.
    Glass, P.
    Aly, H.
    JOURNAL OF PERINATOLOGY, 2012, 32 (04) : 299 - 303