The top-down pattern of social innovation and social entrepreneurship. Bricolage and agility in response to COVID-19: cases from China

被引:41
作者
Crupi, Antonio [1 ]
Liu, Sida [2 ]
Liu, Wei [3 ]
机构
[1] Scuola Super Sant Anna, Inst Management, Piazza Martin della Liberta 33, I-56127 Pisa, PI, Italy
[2] China Automot Engn Res Inst Co Ltd, 9 Jinyu Ave, Chongqing 401122, Peoples R China
[3] Chongqing Univ, Coll Econ & Business Adm, 174 Shazhengjie, Chongqing 400044, Peoples R China
关键词
STRATEGIC AGILITY; ORGANIZATIONAL AGILITY; DYNAMICS; FUTURE; TECHNOLOGIES; PERSPECTIVE;
D O I
10.1111/radm.12499
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Social innovation and social entrepreneurship usually follow a bottom-up pattern. Companies and entrepreneurs decide to focus their business effort on meeting critical and urgent social needs. However, what happens when institutions promote or push top-down initiatives? The outbreak of COVID-19 is redefining, for many aspects, entrepreneurial dynamics. By creating a critical shortage of resources and medical supplies, the pandemic drew central and local institutions to push companies to cover the increasing social and medical needs. This study explores how companies reacted to top-down-initiated social innovation and social entrepreneurship activities. In doing so, the study focuses on the first heavily hit country, China, and it collects data from companies involved in the production of medical masks and the provision of solutions for nucleic acid tests. Our findings reveal that companies answer to top-down pushes by implementing two main strategies in a time of crisis. First, the social bricolage by exploiting available and local resources. Second, companies react with agility by re-thinking their internal innovation, relying on past similar experiences, and making their resource fluid. Our study adds the literature regarding social innovation and entrepreneurship in a crisis time by providing implications for institutions and organizations in setting and responding to strategies for future crises.
引用
收藏
页码:313 / 330
页数:18
相关论文
共 49 条
[1]   Creating something from nothing: Resource construction through entrepreneurial bricolage [J].
Baker, T ;
Nelson, RE .
ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCE QUARTERLY, 2005, 50 (03) :329-366
[2]   Developing absorptive capacity for recombinant innovation [J].
Bessant, John ;
Trifilova, Anna .
BUSINESS PROCESS MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2017, 23 (06) :1094-1107
[3]   Developing organizational agility in product innovation: the roles of IT capability, KM capability, and innovative climate [J].
Cai, Zhao ;
Liu, Hefu ;
Huang, Qian ;
Liang, Liang .
R & D MANAGEMENT, 2019, 49 (04) :421-438
[4]  
Caulier-Grice J., 2010, PAPER PREPARED SOCIA
[5]  
Chesbrough H., 2014, NEW FRONTIERS OPEN I, P169, DOI [10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199682461.003.0009, DOI 10.1093/ACPROF:OSO/9780199682461.003.0009]
[6]   Social entrepreneurship as an essentially contested concept: Opening a new avenue for systematic future research [J].
Choi, Nia ;
Majumdar, Satyajit .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS VENTURING, 2014, 29 (03) :363-376
[7]   The industrial dynamics of Open Innovation -: Evidence from the transformation of consumer electronics [J].
Christensen, JF ;
Olesen, MH ;
Kjær, JS .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2005, 34 (10) :1533-1549
[8]  
Corbin J., 2007, BASICS QUALITATIVE R, V3rd, DOI DOI 10.4135/9781452230153
[9]   Determining validity in qualitative inquiry [J].
Creswell, JW ;
Miller, DL .
THEORY INTO PRACTICE, 2000, 39 (03) :124-130
[10]   A Tale of Two Cultures: Charity, Problem Solving, and the Future of Social Entrepreneurship [J].
Dees, J. Gregory .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS, 2012, 111 (03) :321-334