Sustainability assessment framework for low rise commercial buildings: life cycle impact index-based approach

被引:32
作者
AL-Nassar, Fawaz [1 ]
Ruparathna, Rajeev [1 ]
Chhipi-Shrestha, Gyan [1 ]
Haider, Husnain [2 ]
Hewage, Kasun [1 ]
Sadiq, Rehan [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ British Columbia, Sch Engn, Okanagan Campus,EME4243-1137 Alumni Ave, Kelowna, BC V1V 1V7, Canada
[2] Qassim Univ, Dept Civil Engn, Coll Engn, Buraydah 52571, Qassim, Saudi Arabia
关键词
Life cycle assessment; Life cycle costing; Multi-criteria decision methods; Canada; Low rise commercial buildings; CONSTRUCTION-INDUSTRY; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS; MATERIAL SELECTION; ENERGY ANALYSIS; CONCRETE; WASTE; PERFORMANCE; PROCUREMENT; CHALLENGES; CRITERIA;
D O I
10.1007/s10098-016-1168-1
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The building industry has regularly been criticized for resource exploitation, energy use, waste production, greenhouse gas emissions, and impacts on the landscape. The growing population demands more built environment to accommodate the socioeconomic wellbeing. Adopting conventional construction practices would continue the aforementioned issues. Therefore, it is important to integrate life cycle thinking into building construction to minimize its social, environmental, and economic impacts. The objective of this study is to assess the life cycle impact of commonly used wall-roof systems for low rise commercial building construction in Canada. A framework is developed to assess different building alternatives using the triple bottom line of sustainability. Identified environmental and socioeconomic impact indicators are eventually aggregated to develop a life cycle impact index. Material quantities of six wall-roof combinations for a single-storey commercial building were obtained from industrial partners. State-of-the-art life cycle assessment software is used to assess the life cycle impacts of different wall-roof systems. To accommodate decision makers' preferences of sustainability, wall-roof combinations are assessed for three potential scenarios namely, eco-centric, neutral, and economy-centric using multi-criteria decision analysis. The framework has also been implemented on a case study of low rise building in Calgary (Alberta, Canada) to evaluate its practicality. The study results revealed that the concrete-steel building is the most sustainable alternative in neutral and economy-centric scenario while steel-wood building is the most sustainable building in eco-centric scenario.
引用
收藏
页码:2579 / 2590
页数:12
相关论文
共 80 条
[71]   The effect of material choice on the total energy need and recycling potential of a building [J].
Thormark, C .
BUILDING AND ENVIRONMENT, 2006, 41 (08) :1019-1026
[72]  
Toronto and Barrie Commercial Building Inspector, 2016, LIF EXP COMM BUILD C
[73]   The life-cycle assessment of a single-storey retail building in Canada [J].
Van Ooteghem, Kevin ;
Xu, Lei .
BUILDING AND ENVIRONMENT, 2012, 49 :212-226
[74]   Construction sector views of sustainable building materials [J].
Windapo, Abimbola ;
Ogunsanmi, Olabode .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE INSTITUTION OF CIVIL ENGINEERS-ENGINEERING SUSTAINABILITY, 2014, 167 (02) :64-75
[75]   Application of the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) in multi-criteria analysis of the selection of intelligent building systems [J].
Wong, Johnny K. W. ;
Li, Heng .
BUILDING AND ENVIRONMENT, 2008, 43 (01) :108-125
[76]   LIFE-CYCLE COSTING FOR CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS [J].
WUBBENHORST, KL .
LONG RANGE PLANNING, 1986, 19 (04) :87-97
[77]  
Yale University, 2014, COUNTR RANK
[78]  
Yoon P., 1995, MULTIPLE ATTRIBUTE D
[79]  
Zamagni A., 2008, CRITICAL REV CURRENT
[80]  
[No title captured]