Correlation between thromboelastography and rotational thromboelastometry values in adult liver transplant recipients

Background and Aims: Viscoelastic haemostatic assays (VHA) namely Thromboelastogram (TEG) and Rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM) are used for global assessment of coagulopathy and guiding transfusion during living donor liver transplant (LDLT).We conducted a study to compare the interchangeability of the values obtained from these devices in patients with End stage liver disease (ESLD) undergoing LDLT. Methods: In 76 patients undergoing LDLT, ROTEM and TEG were performed and assessed for interchangeability using Spearman Correlation. The direction and strength of correlation between equivalent parameters was calculated using Inter Class Correlation (ICC) and Bland Altman analysis. Results: The correlation rho between CT (clotting time) of ROTEM and R of TEG was 0.16 (P = 0.19).The ICC was 0.15, with 95% confidence interval (CI) of -0.38-0.48 (P = 0.25).The rho of CFT (ROTEM) with K (TEG) was 0.425 (P=<0.001).The ICC was0.49 with 95% CI of 0.17-0.69, P = 0.003.Alpha of ROTEM correlated with Angle of TEG with rho of 0.475 (P=<0.001). The ICC was 0.61, with 95% CI of 0.36-0.76, P=<0.001.Maximum Clot firmness (MCF) correlated with maximum amplitude (MA) with rho=0.76 (P=<0.001).The ICC was 0.86, with 95% CI of 0.77-0.92, P=<0.001. Lysis index (L30) of ROTEM correlated clot lysis (CL30) of TEG with rho & xfffd; of 0.16 (P = 0.18).However, the ICC was 0.45, with 95% CI of 0.11-0.66, P = 0.08.The correlation between CT of ROTEM and R of TEG as well as L30 of ROTEM and CL30 of TEG was not significant.The strongest correlation was found between MCF and MA (P < 0.001).However the MCF/MA showed an agreement of only 86% (ICC = 0.86). Conclusion: Values from ROTEM and TEG were not found to be interchangeable.