Application of refocused steady-state free-precession methods at 1.5 and 3 T to in vivo high-resolution MRI of trabecular bone: Simulations and experiments

被引:40
作者
Banerjee, S
Han, ET
Krug, R
Newitt, DC
Majumdar, S
机构
[1] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Radiol, San Francisco, CA 94107 USA
[2] Univ Calif Berkeley, Joint Grad Grp Bioengn, San Francisco, CA 94107 USA
[3] GE Healthcare, ASL W, Menlo Pk, CA USA
关键词
SSFP; SNR; high-resolution; trabecular micro-architecture; susceptibility;
D O I
10.1002/jmri.20348
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: To evaluate the potential of fully-balanced steady-state free-precession (SSFP) sequences in in vivo high-resolution (HR) MRI of trabecular bone at field strengths of 1.5 and 3 T by simulation and experimental methods. Materials and Methods: Using simulation studies, refocused SSFP acquisition was optimized for our imaging purposes with a focus on signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and SNR efficiency. The signal behavior in trabecular bone was estimated using a magnetostatic model of the trabecular bone and marrow. Eight normal volunteers were imaged at the proximal femur, calcaneus, and the distal tibia on a GE Signa scanner at 1.5 and at 3 T with an optimized single-acquisition SSFP sequence (three-dimensional FIESTA) and an optimized multiple-acquisition SSFP sequence (three-dimensional FIESTA-c). Images were also acquired with a fast gradient echo (FGRE) sequence for evaluation of the SNR performance of SSFP methods. Results: Refocused SSFP images outperformed FGRE acquisitions in both SNR and SNR efficiency at both field strengths. At 3 T, susceptibility effects were visible in FIESTA and FGRE images and much reduced in FIESTA-c images. The magnitude of SNR boost at 3 T was closely predicted by simulations. Conclusion: Single-acquisition SSFP (at 1.5 T) and multiple-acquisition SSFP (at 3 T) hold great potential for HR-MRI of trabecular bone. (c) 2005 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:818 / 825
页数:8
相关论文
共 27 条
  • [1] Analysis of multiple-acquisition SSFP
    Bangerter, NK
    Hargreaves, BA
    Vasanawala, SS
    Pauly, JM
    Gold, GE
    Nishimura, DG
    [J]. MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 2004, 51 (05) : 1038 - 1047
  • [2] CASSELMAN JW, 1993, AM J NEURORADIOL, V14, P47
  • [3] MAGNETIC-FIELD DISTRIBUTION IN MODELS OF TRABECULAR BONE
    FORD, JC
    WEHRLI, FW
    CHUNG, HW
    [J]. MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 1993, 30 (03) : 373 - 379
  • [4] HAN E, 2003, P 11 ANN M ISMRM TOR
  • [5] Comparison of new sequences for high-resolution cartilage imaging
    Hargreaves, BA
    Gold, GE
    Beaulieu, CF
    Vasanawala, SS
    Nishimura, DG
    Pauly, JM
    [J]. MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 2003, 49 (04) : 700 - 709
  • [6] Characterization and reduction of the transient response in steady-state MR imaging
    Hargreaves, BA
    Vasanawala, SS
    Pauly, JM
    Nishimura, DG
    [J]. MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 2001, 46 (01) : 149 - 158
  • [7] MEASUREMENT OF SIGNAL INTENSITIES IN THE PRESENCE OF NOISE IN MR IMAGES
    HENKELMAN, RM
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1985, 12 (02) : 232 - 233
  • [8] In vivo high resolution MRI of the calcaneus: Differences in trabecular structure in osteoporosis patients
    Link, TM
    Majumdar, S
    Augat, P
    Lin, JC
    Newitt, D
    Lu, Y
    Lane, NE
    Genant, HK
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BONE AND MINERAL RESEARCH, 1998, 13 (07) : 1175 - 1182
  • [9] Trabecular bone structure of the distal radius, the calcaneus, and the spine -: Which site predicts fracture status of the spine best?
    Link, TM
    Bauer, J
    Kollstedt, A
    Stumpf, I
    Hudelmaier, M
    Settles, M
    Majumdar, S
    Lochmüller, EM
    Eckstein, F
    [J]. INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 2004, 39 (08) : 487 - 497
  • [10] High-resolution MRI vs multislice spiral CT: Which technique depicts the trabecular bone structure best?
    Link, TM
    Vieth, V
    Stehling, C
    Lotter, A
    Beer, A
    Newitt, D
    Majumdar, S
    [J]. EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2003, 13 (04) : 663 - 671