German Energiewende and the heating market - Impact and limits of policy

被引:25
作者
Bauermann, Klaas [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Duisburg Essen, Chair Management Sci & Energy Econ, Campus Essen,Univ Str 12, D-45117 Essen, Germany
[2] Statkraft Markets GmbHDerendorfer, Allee 2a, D-40476 Dusseldorf, Germany
关键词
Residential heating market; Policy evaluation; Decarbonisation; Discrete choice; BUILDING STOCK; DECISIONS; OPTIONS;
D O I
10.1016/j.enpol.2016.03.041
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The German Energiewende envisages achieving a climate-neutral building stock in 2050 by means of two major pillars of regulation. First, residential buildings should consume 80% less primary energy and second; the remaining energy demand should be covered primarily with renewables. This paper simulates the future German heating market under different policy scenarios in order to evaluate the impact and limits of recent and conceivable policies. The investigation is based upon a dual model approach, linking a residential heating model to a discrete choice model. The major finding is that current regulations are not suitable for the achievement of governmental targets. Scenario calculations show that additional carbon emission reductions, triggered by the current regulatory regime, are falling short of expectations. In terms of economic efficiency, all calculated policy alternatives outperform the regulation currently in place. This allows to draw the conclusion that carbon emission reductions can be achieved without a major increase in cost. The model results highlight two policy implications. First, a rising mandatory share of renewables in the heating market is needed for target achievement and can be cost effectively. Second, renewable obligations for heating systems must include the existing building stock to achieve the postulated political targets. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:235 / 246
页数:12
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], ENERGIESZENARIEN ENE
[2]   Individual decisions and system development - Integrating modelling approaches for the heating market [J].
Bauermann, Klaas ;
Spiecker, Stephan ;
Weber, Christoph .
APPLIED ENERGY, 2014, 116 :149-158
[3]  
Bemelmans-Videc M-L., 2010, CARROTS STICKS SERMO, VFifth Paperback printing
[4]  
Braun D, 2009, LEHRBUCH POLITIKFELD, P159
[5]  
Buerger V, 2008, ENERG POLICY, V36, P3150, DOI 10.1016/j.enpol.2008.04.018
[6]   Devising renewable heat policy: Overview of support options [J].
Connor, Peter ;
Buerger, Veit ;
Beurskens, Luuk ;
Ericsson, Karin ;
Egger, Christiane .
ENERGY POLICY, 2013, 59 :3-16
[7]  
Diefenbach N., 2010, Datenbasis Gebaudebestand: Datenerhebung zur Energetischen Qualitat und zu den Modernisierungstrends im Deutschen Wohngebaudebestand
[8]  
Ebert M., 2008, VOLLKOSTENVERGLEICH
[9]  
Federal Ministry for the Environment Nature Conservancy and Nuclear Safety (BMU), 2011, EN CONC ITS ACC IMPL
[10]  
Howlett M., 2003, STUDYING PUBLIC POLI, DOI DOI 10.2307/2952394