Sanitary landfill site selection using multi-criteria decision analysis and analytical hierarchy process: A case study in Azuay province, Ecuador

被引:8
作者
Cobos Mora, Sandra Lucia [1 ,2 ]
Solano Pelaez, Jose Luis [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Catholic Univ Cuenca, Civil Engn, Ave Amer & Gen Torres Corner, Cuenca 010102, Ecuador
[2] Univ Seville, Dept Phys Geog & Reg Geog Anal, Seville, Spain
[3] Catholic Univ Cuenca, Environm Engn, Cuenca, Ecuador
[4] Univ Cuyo, Ctr Univ, Philosophy & Letters Fac, Mendoza, Argentina
关键词
Geographical information system; multi-criteria decision analysis; analytical hierarchy process; sanitary landfill; Azuay; Ecuador; GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION-SYSTEM; WASTE MANAGEMENT; COMBINING AHP; GIS; FUZZY; RANKING; LOGIC; KONYA; CITY;
D O I
10.1177/0734242X20932213
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Despite environmental regulations in Ecuador, particularly in the Province of Azuay, the solid waste final disposal management is still a socio-environmental problem, worsened by weak governance processes. The province has three sanitary landfills with almost expired service lives. The site selection was based on circumstantial reasons, which makes landfills more likely to cause environmental pollution and, therefore, have negative implications for public health. The largest landfill serves Cuenca and also leases service to other small cities. The remaining two are small and, accordingly, have limited technology and fewer resources. In this context, the main aim of this study is to evaluate the terrain of the province to find the most suitable area for landfill siting. A multi-criteria decision analysis, integrated with a geographical information system and analytical hierarchy process methodology, was conducted. Fourteen factors and seven constraints were simultaneously analysed, divided into technical, environmental, social, and economic categories; 15 of these criteria were from the Ecuadorian Unified Text of the Secondary Legislation of the Environmental Ministry. According to the results, 76.17% of the territory is not suitable for landfill implementation, and the unrestricted area represents the remaining 23.83%. The highest landfill suitability index (70-81%) is located in the south of the province in Santa Isabel, Ona, and Nabon cantons, which are dry and clay-rich areas.
引用
收藏
页码:1129 / 1141
页数:13
相关论文
共 90 条
[1]   Integrating remote sensing, geographic information system, and analytical hierarchy process for hazardous waste landfill site selection [J].
Abd-El Monsef, Hesham ;
Smith, Scot E. .
ARABIAN JOURNAL OF GEOSCIENCES, 2019, 12 (05)
[2]   GIS modelling for new landfill sites: critical review of employed criteria and methods of selection criteria [J].
Abujayyab, Sohaib K. M. ;
Ahamad, Mohd Sanusi S. ;
Yahya, Ahmad Shukri ;
Bashir, Mohammed J. K. ;
Aziz, Hamidi Abdul .
8TH IGRSM INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE AND EXHIBITION ON GEOSPATIAL & REMOTE SENSING (IGRSM 2016), 2016, 37
[3]  
Addo I.B., 2015, CURR RES J SOC SCI, V7, P81, DOI [10.19026/crjss.7.5225, DOI 10.19026/CRJSS.7.5225]
[4]   Application of geomorphology in urban planning: Case study in landfill site selection [J].
Adeli, Zahra ;
Khorshiddoust, Alimohammad .
2ND INTERNATIONAL GEOGRAPHY SYMPOSIUM-MEDITERRANEAN ENVIRONMENT 2010, 2011, 19 :662-667
[5]  
Adewoye AO, 2017, INT J MULTIDISCIPLIN, V5, P1061
[6]   The precise consistency consensus matrix in a local AHP-group decision making context [J].
Aguaron, Juan ;
Teresa Escobar, Maria ;
Maria Moreno-Jimenez, Jose .
ANNALS OF OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2016, 245 (1-2) :245-259
[7]  
Al-Hanbali A., 2011, Journal of Geographic Information System, V3, P267, DOI 10.4236/jgis.2011.34023
[8]   Municipal solid waste landfill site selection with geographic information systems and analytical hierarchy process: a case study in Mahshahr County, Iran [J].
Alavi, Nadali ;
Goudarzi, Gholamreza ;
Babaei, Ali Akbar ;
Jaafarzadeh, Nemat ;
Hosseinzadeh, Mohsen .
WASTE MANAGEMENT & RESEARCH, 2013, 31 (01) :98-105
[9]  
[Anonymous], 2012, WHAT WASTE GLOBAL RE
[10]  
Aydi A, 2018, FUZZY LOGIC BASED OP, DOI [10.5772/intechopen.75161, DOI 10.5772/INTECHOPEN.75161]