The role of accessibility for land use and land cover change in the Brazilian Amazon

被引:13
作者
Schielein, Johannes [1 ]
Miranda, Javier [1 ,2 ]
de Souza, Rodrigo Antonio [3 ]
Boerner, Jan [1 ,2 ]
Henderson, James [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bonn, Ctr Dev Res, Genscherallee 3, D-53113 Bonn, Germany
[2] Univ Bonn, Inst Food & Resource Econ, Nussallee 21, D-53115 Bonn, Germany
[3] Natl Ctr Monitoring & Environm Informat CENIMA, Brazilian Inst Environm & Renewable Nat Resources, SCEN Ibama Ed Sede, BR-70818900 Brasilia, DF, Brazil
关键词
Accessibility; Infrastructure; LULCC modeling; Amazon; Cattle-ranching; R; PROTECTED AREAS; DEFORESTATION; DYNAMICS; CONSERVATION; SATELLITE; BASIN; ROADS;
D O I
10.1016/j.apgeog.2021.102419
中图分类号
P9 [自然地理学]; K9 [地理];
学科分类号
0705 ; 070501 ;
摘要
Roads and infrastructure are fundamental preconditions for the large-scale conversion of natural forests into agricultural landscapes. Therefore, geographic differences in accessibility are critical for understanding land use and land cover change (LULCC) dynamics. As one of the most dynamic agricultural frontiers globally, the Amazon has much attention in LULCC research. While most studies account for roads and infrastructure, LULCC research often relies on one-dimensional measures of accessibility (e.g., Euclidean distances), which may not optimally represent the underlying latent variable concept. In this study, we demonstrate how alternative concepts and measures of accessibility (specifically travel time maps) can have considerably different explanatory value in the prediction of LULCC. We adopt a panel-data model to explain the geographical distribution of pasture and crop expansion in the Brazilian Amazon using land cover data and travel time maps generated with high-quality representations of existing official and non-official road infrastructure. Our approach's novelty consists of comparing travel time to different markets during the wet- and the dry season and their effect on the allocation of LULCC within a macro scale modeling approach. Our results suggest that (1) pronounced differences between wet- and rainy season accessibility (due to mad quality) increase the likelihood of pasture expansion and reduce the likelihood for crops, and (2) that alternative measures of infrastructure access (e.g., to markets versus towns or processing facilities) can explain different socio-economic aspects of LULCC. Our findings suggest that bad infrastructure quality might severely limit the possibility of establishing a less land-intensive agricultural model in the Amazon and that LULCC research can significantly benefit from improved and context-specific measures of accessibility.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 65 条
  • [1] Andersen L.E., 1997, A cost-benefit analysis of deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2008, ECONOMETRIC ANAL PAN
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2019, Geographic Resources Analysis Support System (GRASS) Software
  • [4] Awaida A., 2018, RCOST ALGORITHM GRAS
  • [5] Baradaran S., 2001, J TRANSPORTATION STA, V4, P1094
  • [6] Roads, deforestation, and the mitigating effect of protected areas in the Amazon
    Barber, Christopher P.
    Cochrane, Mark A.
    Souza, Carlos M., Jr.
    Laurance, William F.
    [J]. BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2014, 177 : 203 - 209
  • [7] Barreto P., 2017, OS FRIGORIFICOS VAO
  • [8] Bellemare MarcF., 2015, Lagged Explanatory Variables and the Estimation of Causal Effects
  • [9] Bivand R, 2019, RGRASS7 INTERFACE GR
  • [10] Bivand R, 2021, RGDAL BINDINGS GEOSP