Procedural justice and compliance behaviour: the mediating role of emotions

被引:153
作者
Murphy, Kristina [1 ]
Tyler, Tom [2 ]
机构
[1] Deakin Univ, Fac Arts, Sch Hist Heritage & Soc, Waurn Ponds, Vic 3217, Australia
[2] NYU, Dept Psychol, New York, NY 10003 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1002/ejsp.502
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Procedural justice researchers have consistently found that if authorities treat people with trust, fairness, respect and neutrality, people will not only be more willing to cooperate with authorities, but they will also be more likely to comply with authority decisions and rules. New research in this area has gone on to explore the role that emotions play in response to procedural justice and injustice. What this new research has neglected to do, however is examine whether emotions mediate the effect of procedural justice on subsequent compliance behaviour in real life settings. Using longitudinal survey data collected in two real-life contexts (Study 1: a taxation dispute (N = 652), and Study 2: workplaces (N = 2366)), the present study will show that perceptions of procedural justice influence the emotions experienced by people, but more importantly these emotional reactions (i.e. anger and happiness) mediate the effect of justice on subsequent compliance behaviour In other words, it is these positive and negative emotional reactions to perceived justice or injustice that go on to predict who will and will not comply with authority decisions and rules. Copyright (C) 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:652 / 668
页数:17
相关论文
共 48 条
[21]  
Lind A., 1988, SOCIAL PSYCHOL PROCE
[22]   Intergroup emotions: Explaining offensive action tendencies in an intergroup context [J].
Mackie, DM ;
Devos, T ;
Smith, ER .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2000, 79 (04) :602-616
[23]  
MAKKAI T, 1994, POLICING SOC, V4, P1
[24]  
MAXFIELD MG, 2008, RES METHODS CIRMINAL
[25]   The role of injustice in the elicitation of differential emotional reactions [J].
Mikula, G ;
Scherer, KR ;
Athenstaedt, U .
PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY BULLETIN, 1998, 24 (07) :769-783
[26]  
Montada L., 1989, SOCIAL JUSTICE RES, V3, P313, DOI [DOI 10.1007/BF01048081, 10.1007/BF01048081]
[27]  
Montada L., 1994, Social Justice Research, V7, P5, DOI [10.1007/BF02333820, DOI 10.1007/BF02333820]
[28]  
Mowday R.T., 1991, Motivation and Work Behavior, V5, P111
[29]   Regulating more effectively: The relationship between procedural justice, legitimacy, and tax non-compliance [J].
Murphy, K .
JOURNAL OF LAW AND SOCIETY, 2005, 32 (04) :562-589
[30]   The role of trust in nurturing compliance: A study of accused tax avoiders [J].
Murphy, K .
LAW AND HUMAN BEHAVIOR, 2004, 28 (02) :187-209