共 50 条
The mind's scalpel in surgical education: a randomised controlled trial of mental imagery
被引:30
作者:
Geoffrion, R.
[1
]
Gebhart, J.
[2
]
Dooley, Y.
[3
]
Bent, A.
[4
]
Dandolu, V.
[5
]
Meeks, R.
[6
]
Baker, K.
[7
]
Tang, S.
Ross, S.
Robert, M.
[8
]
机构:
[1] Univ British Columbia, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Vancouver, BC V5Z 1M9, Canada
[2] Mayo Clin, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Rochester, MN USA
[3] Uniformed Serv Univ Hlth Sci, San Antonio, TX USA
[4] Dalhousie Univ, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Halifax, NS, Canada
[5] Temple Univ, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Philadelphia, PA 19122 USA
[6] Univ Mississippi, Med Ctr, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Jackson, MS 39216 USA
[7] Univ Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[8] Univ Calgary, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Calgary, AB, Canada
关键词:
Gynaecology;
mental imagery;
resident surgical education;
OBJECTIVE STRUCTURED ASSESSMENT;
TECHNICAL SKILLS;
SELF-EFFICACY;
MOTOR-SKILLS;
ACQUISITION;
PERFORMANCE;
RESIDENTS;
D O I:
10.1111/j.1471-0528.2012.03398.x
中图分类号:
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号:
100211 ;
摘要:
Please cite this paper as: Geoffrion R, Gebhart J, Dooley Y, Bent A, Dandolu V, Meeks R, Baker K, Tang S, Ross S, Robert M. The minds scalpel in surgical education: a randomised controlled trial of mental imagery. BJOG 2012;119:10401048. Objective To evaluate the role of mental imagery (MI) in resident training for a complex surgical procedure. Design Randomised controlled trial. Setting Eight centres across Canada and the USA. Population Junior gynaecology residents who had performed fewer than five vaginal hysterectomies (VH). Methods After performing a pretest VH, junior gynaecology residents were randomised to standard MI versus textbook reading (No MI) and then performed a test VH. Surgeons blinded to group evaluated resident performance on the pretest and test VH via global rating scales (GRS), procedure-specific scales and intraoperative parameters. Residents evaluated their own performance. Main outcome measure Change in surgeon GRS score from pretest to test VH. The study was powered to detect a 20% difference in score change. Results Fifty residents completed the trial (24 MI, 26 No MI). There was no difference in GRS score change via blinded assessment from pretest to test evaluation between groups (mean change 13% [SD 17] versus 7% [SD 14], P = 0.192). There was no difference in procedure-specific score change. There was a significant difference in self-scored GRS score change between groups (mean change 19% [SD 12] versus 9% [SD 11], P = 0.005). Residents also felt more confident performing a VH (mean change 19% [SD 16] MI versus 11% [SD 10] No MI, P = 0.033). Conclusions No difference was observed in the surgical performance of residents after MI. Improved resident self-confidence may be attributable to MI or the effect of unblinding on trial participants.
引用
收藏
页码:1040 / 1048
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条