Connecting theory and data to understand recombination rate evolution

被引:56
作者
Dapper, Amy L. [1 ]
Payseur, Bret A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Wisconsin, Lab Genet, Madison, WI 53706 USA
关键词
recombination rate; theory; meiotic recombination; evolution; genetic variation; CROSSING-OVER; DELETERIOUS MUTATIONS; DROSOPHILA-MELANOGASTER; MEIOTIC RECOMBINATION; ANTAGONISTIC COEVOLUTION; ARTIFICIAL SELECTION; CHIASMA FREQUENCY; GENETIC-VARIATION; RED QUEEN; SEX;
D O I
10.1098/rstb.2016.0469
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Meiotic recombination is necessary for successful gametogenesis in most sexually reproducing organisms and is a fundamental genomic parameter, influencing the efficacy of selection and the fate of new mutations. The molecular and evolutionary functions of recombination should impose strong selective constraints on the range of recombination rates. Yet, variation in recombination rate is observed on a variety of genomic and evolutionary scales. In the past decade, empirical studies have described variation in recombination rate within genomes, between individuals, between sexes, between populations and between species. At the same time, theoretical work has provided an increasingly detailed picture of the evolutionary advantages to recombination. Perhaps surprisingly, the causes of natural variation in recombination rate remain poorly understood. We argue that empirical and theoretical approaches to understand the evolution of recombination have proceeded largely independently of each other. Most models that address the evolution of recombination rate were created to explain the evolutionary advantage of recombination rather than quantitative differences in rate among individuals. Conversely, most empirical studies aim to describe variation in recombination rate, rather than to test evolutionary hypotheses. In this Perspective, we argue that efforts to integrate the rich bodies of empirical and theoretical work on recombination rate are crucial to moving this field forward. We provide new directions for the development of theory and the production of data that will jointly close this gap. This article is part of the themed issue 'Evolutionary causes and consequences of recombination rate variation in sexual organisms'.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 169 条
[1]  
ABDULLAH NF, 1974, GENETICS, V76, P447
[2]  
ACTON AB, 1961, AM NAT, V95, P119, DOI 10.1086/282166
[3]   The evolution of plastic recombination [J].
Agrawal, AF ;
Hadany, L ;
Otto, SP .
GENETICS, 2005, 171 (02) :803-812
[4]  
ALLARD RW, 1963, GENETICS, V48, P1389
[5]  
Anderson LK, 1999, GENETICS, V151, P1569
[6]   A Fine-Scale Chimpanzee Genetic Map from Population Sequencing [J].
Auton, Adam ;
Fledel-Alon, Adi ;
Pfeifer, Susanne ;
Venn, Oliver ;
Segurel, Laure ;
Street, Teresa ;
Leffler, Ellen M. ;
Bowden, Rory ;
Aneas, Ivy ;
Broxholme, John ;
Humburg, Peter ;
Iqbal, Zamin ;
Lunter, Gerton ;
Maller, Julian ;
Hernandez, Ryan D. ;
Melton, Cord ;
Venkat, Aarti ;
Nobrega, Marcelo A. ;
Bontrop, Ronald ;
Myers, Simon ;
Donnelly, Peter ;
Przeworski, Molly ;
McVean, Gil .
SCIENCE, 2012, 336 (6078) :193-198
[7]   The recombination landscape of the zebra finch Taeniopygia guttata genome [J].
Backstrom, Niclas ;
Forstmeier, Wolfgang ;
Schielzeth, Holger ;
Mellenius, Harriet ;
Nam, Kiwoong ;
Bolund, Elisabeth ;
Webster, Matthew T. ;
Ost, Torbjorn ;
Schneider, Melanie ;
Kempenaers, Bart ;
Ellegren, Hans .
GENOME RESEARCH, 2010, 20 (04) :485-495
[8]   Variation in Genome-Wide Levels of Meiotic Recombination Is Established at the Onset of Prophase in Mammalian Males [J].
Baier, Brian ;
Hunt, Patricia ;
Broman, Karl W. ;
Hassold, Terry .
PLOS GENETICS, 2014, 10 (01)
[9]   Hybrid Sterility Locus on Chromosome X Controls Meiotic Recombination Rate in Mouse [J].
Balcova, Maria ;
Faltusova, Barbora ;
Gergelits, Vaclav ;
Bhattacharyya, Tanmoy ;
Mihola, Ondrej ;
Trachtulec, Zdenek ;
Knopf, Corinna ;
Fotopulosova, Vladana ;
Chvatalova, Irena ;
Gregorova, Sona ;
Forejt, Jiri .
PLOS GENETICS, 2016, 12 (04)
[10]   A GENERAL-MODEL FOR THE EVOLUTION OF RECOMBINATION [J].
BARTON, NH .
GENETICAL RESEARCH, 1995, 65 (02) :123-144