Analysis of emissions and residue from methods to improve efficiency of at-sea, in situ oil spill burns

被引:16
作者
Aurell, Johanna [1 ]
Holder, Amara [2 ]
Gullett, Brian [2 ]
Lamie, Nathan [3 ]
Arsava, Kemal [3 ]
Conmy, Robyn [4 ]
Sundaravadivelu, Devi [5 ]
Mitchell, William [2 ]
Stone, Karen [6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Dayton, Res Inst, Dayton, OH 45469 USA
[2] US EPA, Off Res & Dev, Res Triangle Pk, NC 27711 USA
[3] US Army Corps Engn, Cold Reg Res Engn Lab, Army Corps Engineers, Hanover, NH 03755 USA
[4] US EPA, Off Res & Dev, Cincinnati, OH 45219 USA
[5] Pegasus Tech Serv Inc, Cincinnati, OH 45219 USA
[6] US Dept Interior, Bur Safety & Environm Enforcement, Sterling, VA 20166 USA
关键词
Pollution; Sampling; Oil spill; Burning; Combustion efficiency; CRUDE-OIL; AERIAL; FIELD;
D O I
10.1016/j.marpolbul.2021.113016
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The combustion efficiency of simulated at-sea surface oil burns (in situ burns) was determined in a 63 m3 tank while testing varied boom configurations and air-assist nozzles in the presence and absence of waves. Combustion efficiencies of Alaska North Slope oil based on unburned carbon in the plume emissions ranged from 85% to 93% while values based on oil mass loss ranged from 89% to 99%. A four-fold variation in PM2.5 emission factors was observed from the test conditions. The most effective burns in terms of reduced emissions and postburn residue concentration of total petroleum hydrocarbons were those that had high length to width boom ratios resulting in higher flame front surface area exposure to ambient air. The amount of oil mass lost was not related to any combustion efficiency parameters measured in the plume, representing a potential tradeoff between unburnt oil and air pollution.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 51 条
[1]  
Allen A.A., 2011, INT OIL SPILL C P, pabs194, DOI [10.7901/2169-3358-2011-1-194, DOI 10.7901/2169-3358-2011-1-194]
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2003, 8015D US EPA
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2006, SHORT STATE OF THE A
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2009, 5243V1 US EPA
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1987, CFR 50
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2017, 3A201 IS EPA
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2017, 25C US EPA
[8]  
[Anonymous], 1994, 6020SW846 US EPA
[9]  
[Anonymous], 1999, TO11A US EPA
[10]  
[Anonymous], 1999, 5040 NIOSH