Development and Pilot Testing of Guidelines to Monitor High-Risk Medications in the Ambulatory Setting

被引:0
作者
Tjia, Jennifer [1 ,2 ]
Field, Terry S. [1 ,2 ]
Garber, Lawrence D. [3 ]
Donovan, Jennifer L. [4 ]
Kanaan, Abir O. [4 ]
Raebel, Marsha A. [5 ]
Zhao, Yanfang [2 ]
Fuller, Jacquelyne C. [2 ]
Gagne, Shawn J. [1 ]
Fischer, Shira H. [1 ]
Gurwitz, Jerry H. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Massachusetts, Div Geriatr Med, Worcester, MA 01605 USA
[2] Meyers Primary Care Inst, Worcester, MA USA
[3] Fallon Clin Inc, Worcester, MA USA
[4] Massachusetts Coll Pharm & Allied Hlth Sci, Worcester, MA USA
[5] Kaiser Permanente Colorado, Denver, CO USA
基金
美国医疗保健研究与质量局;
关键词
ADVERSE DRUG EVENTS; RANDOMIZED-TRIAL; THERAPY; AMIODARONE; INITIATION; CARE;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Objectives: To develop guidelines to monitor high-risk medications and to assess the prevalence of laboratory testing for these medications among a multispecialty group practice. Study Design: Safety intervention trial. Methods: We developed guidelines for the laboratory monitoring of high-risk medications as part of a patient safety intervention trial. An advisory committee of national experts and local leaders used a 2-round Internet-based Delphi process to select guideline medications based on the importance of monitoring for efficacy, safety, and drug-drug interactions. Test frequency recommendations were developed by academic pharmacists based on a literature review and local interdisciplinary consensus. To estimate the potential effect of the planned intervention, we determined the prevalence of high-risk drug dispensings and laboratory testing for guideline medications between January 1, 2008, and July 31, 2008. Results: Consensus on medications to include in the guidelines was achieved in 2 rounds. Final guidelines included 35 drugs or drug classes and 61 laboratory tests. The prevalence of monitoring ranged from less than 50.0% to greater than 90.0%, with infrequently prescribed drugs having a lower prevalence of recommended testing (P <. 001 for new dispensings and P <. 01 for chronic dispensings, nonparametric test for trend). When more than 1 test was recommended for a selected medication, monitoring within a medication sometimes differed by greater than 50.0%. Conclusions: Even among drugs for which there is general consensus that laboratory monitoring is important, the prevalence of monitoring is highly variable. Furthermore, infrequently prescribed medications are at higher risk for poor monitoring. (Am J Manag Care. 2010; 16(7): 489-496)
引用
收藏
页码:489 / 496
页数:8
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], MICR HEALTHC SER
[2]   ABC OF MONITORING DRUG-THERAPY - DIGOXIN [J].
ARONSON, JK ;
HARDMAN, M .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1992, 305 (6862) :1149-1152
[3]   National surveillance of emergency department visits for outpatient adverse drug events [J].
Budnitz, Daniel S. ;
Pollock, Daniel A. ;
Weidenbach, Kelly N. ;
Mendelsohn, Aaron B. ;
Schroeder, Thomas J. ;
Annest, Joseph L. .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2006, 296 (15) :1858-1866
[4]   A WILCOXON-TYPE TEST FOR TREND [J].
CUZICK, J .
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 1985, 4 (01) :87-90
[5]   Allopurinol dosing in renal impairment: Walking the tightrope between adequate urate lowering and adverse events [J].
Dalbeth, Nicola ;
Stamp, Lisa .
SEMINARS IN DIALYSIS, 2007, 20 (05) :391-395
[6]   Improved therapeutic monitoring with several interventions - A randomized trial [J].
Feldstein, Adrianne C. ;
Smith, David H. ;
Perrin, Nancy ;
Yang, Xiuhai ;
Rix, Mary ;
Raebel, Marsha A. ;
Magid, David J. ;
Simon, Steven R. ;
Soumerai, Stephen B. .
ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2006, 166 (17) :1848-1854
[7]   Incidence and preventability of adverse drug events among older persons in the ambulatory setting [J].
Gurwitz, JH ;
Field, TS ;
Harrold, LR ;
Rothschild, J ;
Debellis, K ;
Seger, AC ;
Cadoret, C ;
Garber, L ;
Kelleher, M ;
Bates, DW .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2003, 289 (09) :1107-1116
[8]  
Handler Steven M, 2008, Consult Pharm, V23, P387, DOI 10.4140/TCP.n.2008.387
[9]  
Hewitt M., 2001, Interpreting the volume-outcome relationship in the context of cancer care
[10]  
Hunt SA, 2005, CIRCULATION, V112, pE154, DOI [10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.167586, 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.167587]