Treatment disparities in the care of patients with and without diabetes presenting with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes

被引:23
|
作者
Brogan, GX
Peterson, ED
Mulgund, J
Bhatt, DL
Ohman, EM
Gibler, WB
Pollack, CV
Farkouh, ME
Roe, MT
机构
[1] NYU, Dept Emergency Med, Sch Med, N Shore Long Isl Jewish Hlth Syst, Plainview, NY USA
[2] Duke Univ, Med Ctr, Div Cardiol, Durham, NC 27710 USA
[3] Duke Univ, Med Ctr, Duke Clin Res Inst, Durham, NC USA
[4] Cleveland Clin Fdn, Cleveland, OH 44195 USA
[5] Univ N Carolina, Div Cardiol, Chapel Hill, NC USA
[6] Univ Cincinnati, Sch Med, Dept Emergency Med, Cincinnati, OH USA
[7] Univ Penn, Dept Emergency Med, Penn Hosp, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[8] NYU, Sch Med, Cardiovasc Clin Res Ctr, New York, NY USA
关键词
D O I
10.2337/diacare.29.01.06.dc05-0759
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE - The objective of this study was to characterize treatment patterns among patients with diabetes presenting with non-ST-segment elevation (NSTE) acute coronary syndromes (ACSs). RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS - We compared adherence to treatment recommendations from the American College of Cardiology (ACC)/American Heart Association (AHA) guidelines for NSTE ACS among 46,410 patients from 413 U.S. hospitals that were included in the Can Risk Stratification of Unstable Angina Patients Suppress Adverse Outcomes with Early implementation of the ACC/AHA Guidelines (CRUSADE) quality improvement initiative. Patients were stratified as nondiabetic, non-insulin-dependent diabetic (type 2 diabetic), and insulin-treated diabetic. RESULTS - insulin-treated diabetic patients were less likely than nondiabetic patients to receive aspirin (adjusted odds ratio 0.83 [95% CI 0.74-0.93]), P-blockers (0.89 10.83-0.96]), heparin (0.90 10.83-0.981), and glycoprotein Ilb/Illa inhibitors (0.86 fO.79-0.93]). Type 2 diabetic patients were treated similarly to nondiabetic patients. After adjustment for differences in clinical characteristics, insulin-treated diabetic patients were significantly less likely than nondiabetic patients to receive cardiac catheterization within 48 h of presentation (0.80 [0.740.86])or percutaneous coronary intervention (0.87 [0.82-0.94]). Compared with nondiabetic patients, insulin-treated diabetic and type 2 diabetic patients were more likely to undergo coronary artery bypass grafting (1.34 [1.21-1.49] and 1.35 [1.26-1.44]). In-hospital mortality rates were higher in insulin-treated diabetic (6.8%) and type 2 diabetic (5.4%) than in nondiabetic (4.4%) patients. CONCLUSIONS - Diabetic patients, have a higher risk of mortality than nondiabetic patients, yet physicians adhere to the ACC/AHA NSTE ACS guidelines less often when treating diabetic patients, particularly insulin-treated diabetic patients. Increased use of guideline-recommended therapies and early invasive management strategies in diawith betic patients may improve their outcomes.
引用
收藏
页码:9 / 14
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Approach to non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes
    Slawson, D
    AMERICAN FAMILY PHYSICIAN, 2005, 71 (09) : 1770 - +
  • [12] Conservative strategy in patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes
    Zalewski, Jaroslaw
    Nycz, Krzysztof
    Przewlocki, Tadeusz
    Andres, Marek
    Durak, Monika
    Lech, Piotr
    Pieniazek, Piotr
    Zmudka, Krzysztof
    POSTEPY W KARDIOLOGII INTERWENCYJNEJ, 2010, 6 (04): : 147 - 153
  • [13] Ticagrelor or Prasugrel in Patients With Non-ST-Segment Elevation Acute Coronary Syndromes
    Valina, Christian
    Neumann, Franz-Josef
    Menichelli, Maurizio
    Mayer, Katharina
    Woehrle, Jochen
    Bernlochner, Isabell
    Aytekin, Alp
    Richardt, Gert
    Witzenbichler, Bernhard
    Sibbing, Dirk
    Cassese, Salvatore
    Angiolillo, Dominick J.
    Kufner, Sebastian
    Liebetrau, Christoph
    Hamm, Christian W.
    Xhepa, Erion
    Hapfelmeier, Alexander
    Sager, Hendrik B.
    Wustrow, Isabel
    Joner, Michael
    Trenk, Dietmar
    Laugwitz, Karl-Ludwig
    Schunkert, Heribert
    Schupke, Stefanie
    Kastrati, Adnan
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2020, 76 (21) : 2436 - 2446
  • [14] Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes: The task force for the diagnosis and treatment of non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes of the European Society of Cardiology: reply
    Bassand, Jean-Pierre
    Hamm, Christian
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2008, 29 (02) : 278 - 279
  • [15] Antithrombotic therapy for non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes
    Harrington, Robert A.
    Becker, Richard C.
    Cannon, Christopher P.
    Gutterman, David
    Lincoff, A. Michael
    Popma, Jeffrey J.
    Steg, Gabriel
    Guyatt, Gordon H.
    Goodman, Shaun G.
    CHEST, 2008, 133 (06) : 670S - 707S
  • [16] Interpreting new treatment guidelines for non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes
    Boden, WE
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2001, 88 (8A): : 19K - 24K
  • [17] Management of non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes Introduction
    Nathan, Sandeep
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH-SYSTEM PHARMACY, 2010, 67 (15) : S3 - S6
  • [18] Non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes: an algorithm for decision
    Bertrand, Michel E.
    Collet, Jean Philippe
    Montalescot, Gilles
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2008, 29 (02) : 279 - 280
  • [19] Antiplatelet therapy in non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes
    Schulman, SP
    JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2004, 292 (15): : 1875 - 1882
  • [20] Pretreatment with Prasugrel in Non-ST-Segment Elevation Acute Coronary Syndromes
    Montalescot, Gilles
    Bolognese, Leonardo
    Dudek, Dariusz
    Goldstein, Patrick
    Hamm, Christian
    Tanguay, Jean-Francois
    ten Berg, Jurrien M.
    Miller, Debra L.
    Costigan, Timothy M.
    Goedicke, Jochen
    Silvain, Johanne
    Angioli, Paolo
    Legutko, Jacek
    Niethammer, Margit
    Motovska, Zuzana
    Jakubowski, Joseph A.
    Cayla, Guillaume
    Visconti, Luigi Oltrona
    Vicaut, Eric
    Widimsky, Petr
    NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2013, 369 (11): : 999 - 1010