Effect of feeding calcium gluconate embedded in a hydrogenated fat matrix on feed intake, gastrointestinal fermentation and morphology, intestinal brush border enzyme activity and blood metabolites in growing lambs

Lay Summary Gluconate salts have been reported to be metabolized by microbes in the gastrointestinal tract to yield butyrate. Butyrate has shown potential to enhance functionality of the gastrointestinal tract by increasing the absorptive surface area, enzyme activity, and the barrier function. This study evaluated the inclusion of four levels of hydrogenated fat-embedded Ca-gluconate (HFCG; 0.0%, 0.075%, 0.30%, and 0.60% of the diet) designed to increase the production of butyrate in the large intestine. Thirty-two wether lambs were fed for 28 d, slaughtered, and eviscerated to allow complete evaluation of the gastrointestinal tract and its contents. Growth and dry matter intake decreased linearly with increasing dose of HFCG. Dose of HFCG cubically affected short-chain fatty acid concentration in the cecum with increased concentrations at the 0.075% dose. Moreover, increasing dose of HFCG linearly increased the proportion of acetate and linearly decreased the proportion of propionate in the cecum without altering the proportion of butyrate. Thus, the supplementation of HFCG did not increase butyrate concentration in the large intestine and did not enhance gastrointestinal tract function. Dietary strategies that enhance gastrointestinal tract function have potential to improve utilization of nutrients and limit negative interactions with the microbial species colonizing the gastrointestinal tract. This study evaluates the use of hydrogenated fat-embedded calcium gluconate to modulate gastrointestinal tract function. Gluconate salts have been identified as a butyrate precursor when fed to non-ruminant species and may increase the butyrate concentration in the large intestine supporting gastrointestinal health and development. The objective of this study was to evaluate the dose response of hydrogenated fat-embedded calcium gluconate (HFCG) on performance and gastrointestinal tract (GIT) development in growing lambs. Thirty-two wether lambs were used in a randomized complete block design and assigned to 1 of 4 treatments differing in the inclusion of HFCG: 0.0% (CON), 0.075% (LOW), 0.30% (MED), and 0.60% of the diet (HIGH). Lambs were allocated into individual pens and fed ad libitum with feed delivered twice daily. Feed intake was recorded daily, and body weight (BW) was assessed at the beginning and the end of the 29-d period. Blood was sampled on day 21, prior to feeding and 6 h post-feeding to evaluate changes in beta-hydroxybutyrate, glucose, and insulin concentrations. Total fecal collection was conducted during days 25 to 28 to assess apparent total tract digestibility. On day 29, lambs were slaughtered, and the entire GIT was separated by region to enable sampling of tissue and digesta. Data were analyzed to assess linear, quadratic, and cubic effects of HFCG dose. Final BW, average daily gain, and dry matter intake decreased linearly (P <= 0.02) with increasing HFCG. Increasing inclusion of HFCG linearly decreased (P = 0.01) the thickness of the stratum corneum in ruminal papillae but did not affect other strata (P >= 0.34). Omasal digesta weight linearly decreased (P = 0.01) as the concentration of HFCG increased and abomasal digesta weight was cubically affected (P = 0.03) the increasing dose of HFCG. Short-chain fatty acid concentration in the cecum was cubically affected (P < 0.01) with increasing dose of HFCG where low dose had the greatest concentration. Moreover, increasing the dietary supply of HFCG linearly increased the proportion of acetate (P = 0.04) in the cecum and linearly decreased the proportion of propionate in the digesta of both the cecum (P < 0.01) and colon (P = 0.01). Colon crypt depth was quadratically (P = 0.03) affected with the increasing dose of HFCG, where lambs fed MED had greatest crypt depth. We conclude that feeding HFCG to growing lambs did not increase butyrate concentration in the large intestine and consequently does not increase the absorptive surface area of the whole tract, the size of the GIT, or the functionality of the intestine.