Inhibition of return in visual identification tasks

被引:39
作者
Cheal, M
Chastain, G
Lyon, DR
机构
[1] Univ Dayton, Res Inst, Dayton, OH 45469 USA
[2] Arizona State Univ, Dept Psychol, Tempe, AZ 85287 USA
[3] Boise State Univ, Dept Psychol, Boise, ID 83725 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1080/713756786
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
In detection tasks, at long precue-target intervals, inhibition from precueing, rather than facilitation, has been shown. This inhibition, called "inhibition of return" (IOR), does not always occur in discrimination or identification tasks. Here in post-hoc analyses and three new experiments, evidence for IOR was shown in a target identification task using a location-cueing paradigm. In Experiments 1 and 2, a series of three cues attracted attention without eye movement, first to one of four peripheral locations, then to fixation, and then either back to the initial location or to a different one. Identification accuracy for masked visual targets was impaired when third-cue and first-cue locations matched, which constitutes evidence for IOR. In Experiment 3, there was no third cue. An uninformative first cue was followed by a cue at fixation, and then a peripheral target in a "go/no-go" reaction time task. Inhibition of return was still obtained. Thus, IOR can affect identification as well as detection performance, so it could be a general mechanism for optimising search.
引用
收藏
页码:365 / 388
页数:24
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]   INHIBITION OF RETURN - EFFECTS OF ATTENTIONAL CUEING ON EYE-MOVEMENT LATENCIES [J].
ABRAMS, RA ;
DOBKIN, RS .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-HUMAN PERCEPTION AND PERFORMANCE, 1994, 20 (03) :467-477
[2]   ENHANCEMENT OF PERCEPTUAL SENSITIVITY AS THE RESULT OF SELECTIVELY ATTENDING TO SPATIAL LOCATIONS [J].
BASHINSKI, HS ;
BACHARACH, VR .
PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 1980, 28 (03) :241-248
[3]   Attention and nontarget effects in the location-cuing paradigm [J].
Chastain, G ;
Cheal, M ;
Lyon, DR .
PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 1996, 58 (02) :300-309
[4]   Facilitatory or inhibitory nontarget effects in the location-cuing paradigm [J].
Chastain, G ;
Cheal, M .
CONSCIOUSNESS AND COGNITION, 1997, 6 (2-3) :328-347
[5]   Understanding diverse effects of visual attention with the VAP-filters metaphor [J].
Cheal, M .
CONSCIOUSNESS AND COGNITION, 1997, 6 (2-3) :348-362
[6]   CENTRAL AND PERIPHERAL PRECUING OF FORCED-CHOICE DISCRIMINATION [J].
CHEAL, ML ;
LYON, DR .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY SECTION A-HUMAN EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1991, 43 (04) :859-880
[7]   A FRAMEWORK FOR UNDERSTANDING THE ALLOCATION OF ATTENTION IN LOCATION-PRECUSED DISCRIMINATION [J].
CHEAL, ML ;
LYON, DR ;
GOTTLOB, LR .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY SECTION A-HUMAN EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1994, 47 (03) :699-739
[8]   ATTENTION EFFECTS ON FORM DISCRIMINATION AT DIFFERENT ECCENTRICITIES [J].
CHEAL, ML ;
LYON, D .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY SECTION A-HUMAN EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1989, 41 (04) :719-746
[9]   DOES ATTENTION HAVE DIFFERENT EFFECTS ON LINE ORIENTATION AND LINE ARRANGEMENT DISCRIMINATION [J].
CHEAL, ML ;
LYON, DR ;
HUBBARD, DC .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY SECTION A-HUMAN EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1991, 43 (04) :825-857
[10]   BENEFITS FROM ATTENTION DEPEND ON THE TARGET TYPE IN LOCATION-PRECUED DISCRIMINATION [J].
CHEAL, ML ;
LYON, DR .
ACTA PSYCHOLOGICA, 1992, 81 (03) :243-267