May it please the chief? Opinion assignments in the Rehnquist court

被引:75
作者
Maltzman, F
Wahlbeck, PJ
机构
关键词
D O I
10.2307/2111631
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
Theory: Majority opinion assignments made by the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court can be accounted for with both organizational and attitudinal models of behavior. Hypotheses: The likelihood that the Chief assigns an opinion to a justice depends upon the importance of each case, the size of the initial majority coalition, the timing of the decision, and each justice's expertise, efficiency, workload, and policy preferences. Method: A discrete choice model is used to test a multivariate model of the assignments made by Chief Justice William Rehnquist. Results: Chief Justice Rehnquist's assignments are determined by the Court's organizational needs, rather than the Chiefs policy preferences.
引用
收藏
页码:421 / 443
页数:23
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]  
Aldrich J. H., 1984, Linear Probability, Logit, and Probit Models
[2]  
[Anonymous], J PUBLIC LAW
[3]  
[Anonymous], AM COURT SYSTEMS
[4]  
[Anonymous], STUDIES US SUPREME C
[5]  
BAUM L, 1985, SUPREME COURT
[6]   STRATEGIC CHOICE AND OPINION ASSIGNMENT ON THE UNITED-STATES SUPREME-COURT - A RE-EXAMINATION [J].
BRENNER, S .
WESTERN POLITICAL QUARTERLY, 1982, 35 (02) :204-211
[7]   ISSUE SPECIALIZATION IN MAJORITY OPINION ASSIGNMENT ON THE BURGER COURT [J].
BRENNER, S ;
SPAETH, HJ .
WESTERN POLITICAL QUARTERLY, 1986, 39 (03) :520-527
[8]  
BRENNER S, 1988, JUDICATURE, V72, P179
[9]   INCREASING THE SIZE OF MINIMUM WINNING ORIGINAL COALITIONS ON THE WARREN COURT [J].
BRENNER, S ;
HAGLE, T ;
SPAETH, HJ .
POLITY, 1990, 23 (02) :309-318