Noise levels received by endangered killer whales Orcinus orca before and after implementation of vessel regulations

被引:15
作者
Holt, Marla M. [1 ]
Hanson, M. Bradley [1 ]
Giles, Deborah A. [2 ]
Emmons, Candice K. [1 ]
Hogan, Jeffery T. [3 ]
机构
[1] NOAA, Conservat Biol Div, Northwest Fisheries Sci Ctr, Natl Marine Fisheries Serv, 2725 Montlake Blvd East, Seattle, WA 98112 USA
[2] Univ Calif Davis, Wildlife Fish & Conservat Biol, 1088 Acad Surge,One Shields Ave, Davis, CA 95616 USA
[3] Cascadia Res Collect, 218 1-2 4th Ave West, Olympia, WA 98501 USA
关键词
Killer whale; Orcinus orca; Noise; Vessel regulations; Whale watching; Wildlife viewing; Archival tag; INCREASE;
D O I
10.3354/esr00841
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Whale watching is often conducted from motorized vessels, which contribute to underwater noise pollution and can disturb marine mammals. Protective measures can ameliorate some effects of disturbance, but it is crucial to empirically assess the effectiveness of such measures, particularly for endangered species. We quantitatively compared noise exposure to endangered southern resident killer whales before and after US federal vessel regulations were established to protect this population from disturbance by vessels and sound. We expected to see a reduction in noise exposure to this population from vessel sound propagation loss due to a doubling of the minimum viewing distance relative to a prior state law. Noise levels were empirically measured from digital acoustic recording tags (DTAGs) suction-cup attached to killer whales in transboundary critical habitat. We collected concurrent vessel data during DTAG deployments to relate to received noise levels at the animal. Results of a linear mixed model analysis that included 10 explanatory variables in candidate models revealed that noise was best predicted by animal ID, vessel count, vessel speed category, and year. Vessel count and speed category were positive predictors of noise levels. Vessel regulations (before vs. after implementation), country, and average vessel distance were not significant predictors of noise levels, although only 1 yr of baseline data limited assessment. These findings inform managers about the effectiveness of current regulations for viewing killer whales and are applicable to other cetacean species that are exposed to vessel noise from whale-watching activities.
引用
收藏
页码:15 / 26
页数:12
相关论文
共 43 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2003, OC NOIS MAR MAMM
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2006, Proposed Recovery Plan for Southern Resident Killer
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2008, Federal Register, V75, P60173
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2002, NMFSNWFSC54 NOAA US
[5]   The mixed blessing of echolocation: Differences in sonar use by fish-eating and mammal-eating killer whales [J].
BarrettLennard, LG ;
Ford, JKB ;
Heise, KA .
ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR, 1996, 51 :553-565
[6]   A vessel noise budget for Admiralty Inlet, Puget Sound, Washington (USA) [J].
Bassett, Christopher ;
Polagye, Brian ;
Holt, Marla ;
Thomson, Jim .
JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2012, 132 (06) :3706-3719
[7]  
Bates D., 2014, J Stat Softw, DOI [DOI 10.18637/JSS.V067.I01, 10.18637/jss.v067.i01]
[8]   Killer whale (Orcinus orca) behavioral audiograms [J].
Branstetter, Brian K. ;
Leger, Judy St. ;
Acton, Doug ;
Stewart, John ;
Houser, Dorian ;
Finneran, James J. ;
Jenkins, Keith .
JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2017, 141 (04) :2387-2398
[9]   First direct measurements of behavioural responses by Cuvier's beaked whales to mid-frequency active sonar [J].
DeRuiter, Stacy L. ;
Southall, Brandon L. ;
Calambokidis, John ;
Zimmer, Walter M. X. ;
Sadykova, Dinara ;
Falcone, Erin A. ;
Friedlaender, Ari S. ;
Joseph, John E. ;
Moretti, David ;
Schorr, Gregory S. ;
Thomas, Len ;
Tyack, Peter L. .
BIOLOGY LETTERS, 2013, 9 (04)
[10]   Underwater noise of whale-watching boats and potential effects on killer whales (Orcinus orca), based on an acoustic impact model [J].
Erbe, C .
MARINE MAMMAL SCIENCE, 2002, 18 (02) :394-418