Pragmatic Implementation of a Stratified Primary Care Model for Low Back Pain Management in Outpatient Physical Therapy Settings: Two-Phase, Sequential Preliminary Study

被引:56
作者
Beneciuk, Jason M. [1 ,2 ]
George, Steven Z. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Florida, Dept Phys Therapy, Gainesville, FL 32610 USA
[2] Brooks Rehabil Coll Publ Hlth & Hlth Profess Res, Jacksonville, FL USA
来源
PHYSICAL THERAPY | 2015年 / 95卷 / 08期
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
START BACK; SCREENING TOOL; DISABILITY QUESTIONNAIRE; PSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIES; PROVIDERS ATTITUDES; TARGETED TREATMENT; CLINICAL-TRIAL; IMPACT BACK; BELIEFS; PHYSIOTHERAPISTS;
D O I
10.2522/ptj.20140418
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background. The effectiveness of risk stratification for low back pain (LBP) management has not been demonstrated in outpatient physical therapy settings. Objective. The purposes of this study were: (1) to assess implementation of a stratified care approach for LBP management by evaluating short-term treatment effects and (2) to determine feasibility of conducting a larger-scale study. Design. This was a 2-phase, preliminary study. Methods. In phase 1, clinicians were randomly assigned to receive standard (n=6) or stratified care (n=6) training. Stratified care training included 8 hours of content focusing on psychologically informed practice. Changes in LBP attitudes and beliefs were assessed using the Pain Attitudes and Beliefs Scale for Physiotherapists (PABS-PT) and the Health Care Providers Pain and Impairment Relationship Scale (HC-PAIRS). In phase 2, clinicians receiving the stratified care training were instructed to incorporate those strategies in their practice and 4-week patient outcomes were collected using a numerical pain rating scale (NPRS), and the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). Study feasibility was assessed to identify potential barriers for completion of a larger-scale study. Results. In phase 1, minimal changes were observed for PABS-PT and HC-PAIRS scores for standard care clinicians (Cohen d=0.00 - 0.28). Decreased biomedical (-4.5 +/- 2.5 points, d=1.08) and increased biopsychosocial (+5.5 +/- 2.0 points, d=2.86) treatment orientations were observed for stratified care clinicians, with these changes sustained 6 months later on the PABS-PT. In phase 2, patients receiving stratified care (n=67) had greater between-group improvements in NPRS (0.8 points; 95% confidence interval=0.1, 1.5; d=0.40) and ODI (8.9% points; 95% confidence interval=4.1, 13.6; d=0.76) scores compared with patients receiving standard physical therapy care (n=33). Limitations. In phase 2, treatment was not randomly assigned, and therapist adherence to treatment recommendations was not monitored. This study was not adequately powered to conduct subgroup analyses. Conclusions. In physical therapy settings, biomedical orientation can be modified, and risk-stratified care for LBP can be effectively implemented. Findings from this study can be used for planning of larger studies.
引用
收藏
页码:1120 / 1134
页数:15
相关论文
共 55 条
  • [1] The STarT Back Screening Tool and Individual Psychological Measures: Evaluation of Prognostic Capabilities for Low Back Pain Clinical Outcomes in Outpatient Physical Therapy Settings
    Beneciuk, Jason M.
    Bishop, Mark D.
    Fritz, Julie M.
    Robinson, Michael E.
    Asal, Nabih R.
    Nisenzon, Anne N.
    George, Steven Z.
    [J]. PHYSICAL THERAPY, 2013, 93 (03): : 321 - 333
  • [2] Do physical therapists in the United Kingdom recognize psychosocial factors in patients with acute low back pain?
    Bishop, A
    Foster, NE
    [J]. SPINE, 2005, 30 (11) : 1316 - 1322
  • [3] Health care practitioners' attitudes and beliefs about low back pain: A systematic search and critical review of available measurement tools
    Bishop, Annette
    Thomas, Elaine
    Foster, Nadine E.
    [J]. PAIN, 2007, 132 (1-2) : 91 - 101
  • [4] Accuracy of recall of usual pain intensity in back pain patients
    Bolton, JE
    [J]. PAIN, 1999, 83 (03) : 533 - 539
  • [5] Continuing Education for Advanced Manual and Manipulative Physiotherapists in Canada: A Survey of Perceived Needs
    Chau, Joyce
    Chadbourn, Pamela
    Hamel, Rebecca
    Mok, Sherman
    Robles, Bradley
    Chan, Lianne
    Cott, Cheryl
    Yeung, Euson
    [J]. PHYSIOTHERAPY CANADA, 2012, 64 (01) : 20 - 30
  • [6] Responsiveness of the numeric pain rating scale in patients with low back pain
    Childs, JD
    Piva, SR
    Fritz, JM
    [J]. SPINE, 2005, 30 (11) : 1331 - 1334
  • [7] A POWER PRIMER
    COHEN, J
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1992, 112 (01) : 155 - 159
  • [8] Physiotherapists' pain beliefs and their influence on the management of patients with chronic low back pain
    Daykin, AR
    Richardson, B
    [J]. SPINE, 2004, 29 (07) : 783 - 795
  • [9] Low Back Pain Clinical Practice Guidelines Linked to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health from the Orthopaedic Section of the American Physical Therapy Association
    Delitto, Anthony
    George, Steven Z.
    Van Dillen, Linda
    Whitman, Julie M.
    Sowa, Gwendolyn
    Shekelle, Paul
    Denninger, Thomas R.
    Godges, Joseph J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC & SPORTS PHYSICAL THERAPY, 2012, 42 (04) : A1 - A57
  • [10] Demmelmaier Ingrid, 2012, Physiotherapy Theory and Practice, V28, P359, DOI 10.3109/09593985.2011.629022