Validation of a GPU-based Monte Carlo code (gPMC) for proton radiation therapy: clinical cases study

被引:41
|
作者
Giantsoudi, Drosoula [1 ,2 ]
Schuemann, Jan [1 ,2 ]
Jia, Xun [3 ]
Dowdell, Stephen [4 ]
Jiang, Steve [3 ]
Paganetti, Harald [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Dept Radiat Oncol, Boston, MA 02114 USA
[2] Harvard Univ, Sch Med, Boston, MA USA
[3] Univ Texas SW Med Ctr Dallas, Dept Radiat Oncol, Dallas, TX 75390 USA
[4] Shoalhaven Canc Care Ctr, Nowra, NSW, Australia
关键词
Monte Carlo; GPU; gPMC; clinical validation; proton radiation therapy; RANGE UNCERTAINTIES; DOSE CALCULATION; ELECTRON-TRANSPORT; DISTRIBUTIONS; SIMULATION; ALGORITHM; GEANT4; TOPAS;
D O I
10.1088/0031-9155/60/6/2257
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
Monte Carlo (MC) methods are recognized as the gold-standard for dose calculation, however they have not replaced analytical methods up to now due to their lengthy calculation times. GPU-based applications allow MC dose calculations to be performed on time scales comparable to conventional analytical algorithms. This study focuses on validating our GPU-based MC code for proton dose calculation (gPMC) using an experimentally validated multi-purpose MC code (TOPAS) and compare their performance for clinical patient cases. Clinical cases from five treatment sites were selected covering the full range from very homogeneous patient geometries (liver) to patients with high geometrical complexity (air cavities and density heterogeneities in head-and-neck and lung patients) and from short beam range (breast) to large beam range (prostate). Both gPMC and TOPAS were used to calculate 3D dose distributions for all patients. Comparisons were performed based on target coverage indices (mean dose, V-95, D-98, D-50, D-02) and gamma index distributions. Dosimetric indices differed less than 2% between TOPAS and gPMC dose distributions for most cases. Gamma index analysis with 1%/1 mm criterion resulted in a passing rate of more than 94% of all patient voxels receiving more than 10% of the mean target dose, for all patients except for prostate cases. Although clinically insignificant, gPMC resulted in systematic underestimation of target dose for prostate cases by 1-2% compared to TOPAS. Correspondingly the gamma index analysis with 1%/1 mm criterion failed for most beams for this site, while for 2%/1 mm criterion passing rates of more than 94.6% of all patient voxels were observed. For the same initial number of simulated particles, calculation time for a single beam for a typical head and neck patient plan decreased from 4 CPU hours per million particles (2.8-2.9 GHz Intel X5600) for TOPAS to 2.4 s per million particles (NVIDIA TESLA C2075) for gPMC. Excellent agreement was demonstrated between our fast GPU-based MC code (gPMC) and a previously extensively validated multi-purpose MC code (TOPAS) for a comprehensive set of clinical patient cases. This shows that MC dose calculations in proton therapy can be performed on time scales comparable to analytical algorithms with accuracy comparable to state-of-the-art CPU-based MC codes.
引用
收藏
页码:2257 / 2269
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] GPU-based Monte Carlo simulation in neutron transport and finite differences heat equation evaluation
    Heimlich, A.
    Mol, A. C. A.
    Pereira, C. M. N. A.
    PROGRESS IN NUCLEAR ENERGY, 2011, 53 (02) : 229 - 239
  • [42] GPU-based Monte Carlo ray tracing simulation considering refraction for central receiver system
    Lin, Xiaoxia
    He, Caitou
    Huang, Wenjun
    Zhao, Yuhong
    Feng, Jieqing
    RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2022, 193 : 367 - 382
  • [43] Research on GPU-based acceleration method for Monte Carlo neutron geometry treatment
    Xu, Q., 1600, Atomic Energy Press (47): : 689 - 695
  • [44] A GPU-based direct Monte Carlo simulation of time dependence in nuclear reactors
    Molnar, Balazs
    Tolnai, Gabor
    Legrady, David
    ANNALS OF NUCLEAR ENERGY, 2019, 132 : 46 - 63
  • [45] Technical Note: Integrating an open source Monte Carlo code "MCsquare" for clinical use in intensity-modulated proton therapy
    Deng, Wei
    Younkin, James E.
    Souris, Kevin
    Huang, Sheng
    Augustine, Kurt
    Fatyga, Mirek
    Ding, Xiaoning
    Cohilis, Marie
    Bues, Martin
    Shan, Jie
    Stoker, Joshua
    Lin, Liyong
    Shen, Jiajian
    Liu, Wei
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2020, 47 (06) : 2558 - 2574
  • [46] Formal quality control for a proton Monte Carlo system in radiation therapy
    Perl, J.
    XVII INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON THE USE OF COMPUTERS IN RADIATION THERAPY (ICCR 2013), 2014, 489
  • [47] A Monte Carlo based radiation response modelling framework to assess variability of clinical RBE in proton therapy
    Eulitz, J.
    Lutz, B.
    Wohlfahrt, P.
    Dutz, A.
    Enghardt, W.
    Karpowitz, C.
    Krause, M.
    Troost, E. G. C.
    Luehr, A.
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2019, 64 (22)
  • [48] Automation of Monte Carlo-based treatment plan verification for proton therapy
    Kaluarachchi, Maduka
    Moskvin, Vadim
    Pirlepesov, Fakhriddin
    Wilson, Lydia J.
    Xie, Fang
    Faught, Austin M.
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2020, 21 (08): : 131 - 138
  • [49] GPU-based acceleration of Monte Carlo simulations for migration-coalescence evolution of gas bubbles in materials
    Zhai, Lei
    Ma, Chaoqiong
    Cui, Jiechao
    Hou, Qing
    MODELLING AND SIMULATION IN MATERIALS SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2019, 27 (05)
  • [50] Monte Carlo study of the free radical yields in minibeam radiation therapy
    Masilela, Thongchai A. M.
    Prezado, Yolanda
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2023, 50 (08) : 5115 - 5134