Validation of a GPU-based Monte Carlo code (gPMC) for proton radiation therapy: clinical cases study

被引:41
|
作者
Giantsoudi, Drosoula [1 ,2 ]
Schuemann, Jan [1 ,2 ]
Jia, Xun [3 ]
Dowdell, Stephen [4 ]
Jiang, Steve [3 ]
Paganetti, Harald [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Dept Radiat Oncol, Boston, MA 02114 USA
[2] Harvard Univ, Sch Med, Boston, MA USA
[3] Univ Texas SW Med Ctr Dallas, Dept Radiat Oncol, Dallas, TX 75390 USA
[4] Shoalhaven Canc Care Ctr, Nowra, NSW, Australia
关键词
Monte Carlo; GPU; gPMC; clinical validation; proton radiation therapy; RANGE UNCERTAINTIES; DOSE CALCULATION; ELECTRON-TRANSPORT; DISTRIBUTIONS; SIMULATION; ALGORITHM; GEANT4; TOPAS;
D O I
10.1088/0031-9155/60/6/2257
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
Monte Carlo (MC) methods are recognized as the gold-standard for dose calculation, however they have not replaced analytical methods up to now due to their lengthy calculation times. GPU-based applications allow MC dose calculations to be performed on time scales comparable to conventional analytical algorithms. This study focuses on validating our GPU-based MC code for proton dose calculation (gPMC) using an experimentally validated multi-purpose MC code (TOPAS) and compare their performance for clinical patient cases. Clinical cases from five treatment sites were selected covering the full range from very homogeneous patient geometries (liver) to patients with high geometrical complexity (air cavities and density heterogeneities in head-and-neck and lung patients) and from short beam range (breast) to large beam range (prostate). Both gPMC and TOPAS were used to calculate 3D dose distributions for all patients. Comparisons were performed based on target coverage indices (mean dose, V-95, D-98, D-50, D-02) and gamma index distributions. Dosimetric indices differed less than 2% between TOPAS and gPMC dose distributions for most cases. Gamma index analysis with 1%/1 mm criterion resulted in a passing rate of more than 94% of all patient voxels receiving more than 10% of the mean target dose, for all patients except for prostate cases. Although clinically insignificant, gPMC resulted in systematic underestimation of target dose for prostate cases by 1-2% compared to TOPAS. Correspondingly the gamma index analysis with 1%/1 mm criterion failed for most beams for this site, while for 2%/1 mm criterion passing rates of more than 94.6% of all patient voxels were observed. For the same initial number of simulated particles, calculation time for a single beam for a typical head and neck patient plan decreased from 4 CPU hours per million particles (2.8-2.9 GHz Intel X5600) for TOPAS to 2.4 s per million particles (NVIDIA TESLA C2075) for gPMC. Excellent agreement was demonstrated between our fast GPU-based MC code (gPMC) and a previously extensively validated multi-purpose MC code (TOPAS) for a comprehensive set of clinical patient cases. This shows that MC dose calculations in proton therapy can be performed on time scales comparable to analytical algorithms with accuracy comparable to state-of-the-art CPU-based MC codes.
引用
收藏
页码:2257 / 2269
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] A Dynamic Accuracy Estimation for GPU-based Monte Carlo Simulation in Tissue Optics
    Cai, Fuhong
    Lu, Wen
    CURRENT OPTICS AND PHOTONICS, 2017, 1 (05) : 551 - 555
  • [32] Virtual dosimetry study with three cone-beam breast computed tomography scanners using a fast GPU-based Monte Carlo code
    Mettivier, Giovanni
    Lai, Youfang
    Jia, Xun
    Russo, Paolo
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2024, 69 (04)
  • [33] GPU-based cross-platform Monte Carlo proton dose calculation engine in the framework of Taichi
    Li, Wei-Guang
    Chang, Cheng
    Qin, Yao
    Wang, Zi-Lu
    Li, Kai-Wen
    Geng, Li-Sheng
    Wu, Hao
    NUCLEAR SCIENCE AND TECHNIQUES, 2023, 34 (05)
  • [34] Comprehensive evaluations of cone-beam CT dose in image-guided radiation therapy via GPU-based Monte Carlo simulations
    Montanari, Davide
    Scolari, Enrica
    Silvestri, Chiara
    Graves, Yan Jiang
    Yan, Hao
    Cervino, Laura
    Rice, Roger
    Jiang, Steve B.
    Jia, Xun
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2014, 59 (05) : 1239 - 1253
  • [35] A rapid GPU-based Monte Carlo simulation tool for individualized dose estimations in CT
    Sharma, Shobhit
    Kapadia, Anuj
    Abadi, Ehsan
    Fu, Wanyi
    Segars, W. Paul
    Samei, Ehsan
    MEDICAL IMAGING 2018: PHYSICS OF MEDICAL IMAGING, 2018, 10573
  • [36] Domain decomposition for GPU-Based continuous energy Monte Carlo power reactor calculation
    Choi, Namjae
    Joo, Han Gyu
    NUCLEAR ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY, 2020, 52 (11) : 2667 - 2677
  • [37] GPU-based fast Monte Carlo simulation for radiotherapy dose calculation
    Jia, Xun
    Gu, Xuejun
    Graves, Yan Jiang
    Folkerts, Michael
    Jiang, Steve B.
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2011, 56 (22) : 7017 - 7031
  • [38] A GPU-based parallelized Monte-Carlo method for particle coagulation using an acceptance-rejection strategy
    Wei, Jianming
    Kruis, Frank Einar
    CHEMICAL ENGINEERING SCIENCE, 2013, 104 : 451 - 459
  • [39] A GPU-based large-scale Monte Carlo simulation method for systems with long-range interactions
    Liang, Yihao
    Xing, Xiangjun
    Li, Yaohang
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL PHYSICS, 2017, 338 : 252 - 268
  • [40] Implementation and Performance of a GPU-Based Monte-Carlo Framework for Determining Design Ice Load
    Ayubian, Sara
    Alawneh, Shadi
    Richard, Martin
    Thijssen, Jan
    2017 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON HIGH PERFORMANCE COMPUTING & SIMULATION (HPCS), 2017, : 109 - 116