Validation of a GPU-based Monte Carlo code (gPMC) for proton radiation therapy: clinical cases study

被引:41
|
作者
Giantsoudi, Drosoula [1 ,2 ]
Schuemann, Jan [1 ,2 ]
Jia, Xun [3 ]
Dowdell, Stephen [4 ]
Jiang, Steve [3 ]
Paganetti, Harald [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Dept Radiat Oncol, Boston, MA 02114 USA
[2] Harvard Univ, Sch Med, Boston, MA USA
[3] Univ Texas SW Med Ctr Dallas, Dept Radiat Oncol, Dallas, TX 75390 USA
[4] Shoalhaven Canc Care Ctr, Nowra, NSW, Australia
关键词
Monte Carlo; GPU; gPMC; clinical validation; proton radiation therapy; RANGE UNCERTAINTIES; DOSE CALCULATION; ELECTRON-TRANSPORT; DISTRIBUTIONS; SIMULATION; ALGORITHM; GEANT4; TOPAS;
D O I
10.1088/0031-9155/60/6/2257
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
Monte Carlo (MC) methods are recognized as the gold-standard for dose calculation, however they have not replaced analytical methods up to now due to their lengthy calculation times. GPU-based applications allow MC dose calculations to be performed on time scales comparable to conventional analytical algorithms. This study focuses on validating our GPU-based MC code for proton dose calculation (gPMC) using an experimentally validated multi-purpose MC code (TOPAS) and compare their performance for clinical patient cases. Clinical cases from five treatment sites were selected covering the full range from very homogeneous patient geometries (liver) to patients with high geometrical complexity (air cavities and density heterogeneities in head-and-neck and lung patients) and from short beam range (breast) to large beam range (prostate). Both gPMC and TOPAS were used to calculate 3D dose distributions for all patients. Comparisons were performed based on target coverage indices (mean dose, V-95, D-98, D-50, D-02) and gamma index distributions. Dosimetric indices differed less than 2% between TOPAS and gPMC dose distributions for most cases. Gamma index analysis with 1%/1 mm criterion resulted in a passing rate of more than 94% of all patient voxels receiving more than 10% of the mean target dose, for all patients except for prostate cases. Although clinically insignificant, gPMC resulted in systematic underestimation of target dose for prostate cases by 1-2% compared to TOPAS. Correspondingly the gamma index analysis with 1%/1 mm criterion failed for most beams for this site, while for 2%/1 mm criterion passing rates of more than 94.6% of all patient voxels were observed. For the same initial number of simulated particles, calculation time for a single beam for a typical head and neck patient plan decreased from 4 CPU hours per million particles (2.8-2.9 GHz Intel X5600) for TOPAS to 2.4 s per million particles (NVIDIA TESLA C2075) for gPMC. Excellent agreement was demonstrated between our fast GPU-based MC code (gPMC) and a previously extensively validated multi-purpose MC code (TOPAS) for a comprehensive set of clinical patient cases. This shows that MC dose calculations in proton therapy can be performed on time scales comparable to analytical algorithms with accuracy comparable to state-of-the-art CPU-based MC codes.
引用
收藏
页码:2257 / 2269
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A GPU-based fast Monte Carlo code that supports proton transport in magnetic field for radiation therapy
    Li, Shijun
    Cheng, Bo
    Wang, Yuxin
    Pei, Xi
    Xu, Xie George
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2024, 25 (01):
  • [2] Recent developments and comprehensive evaluations of a GPU-based Monte Carlo package for proton therapy
    Qin, Nan
    Botas, Pablo
    Giantsoudi, Drosoula
    Schuemann, Jan
    Tian, Zhen
    Jiang, Steve B.
    Paganetti, Harald
    Jia, Xun
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2016, 61 (20) : 7347 - 7362
  • [3] Automatic commissioning of a GPU-based Monte Carlo radiation dose calculation code for photon radiotherapy
    Tian, Zhen
    Graves, Yan Jiang
    Jia, Xun
    Jiang, Steve B.
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2014, 59 (21) : 6467 - 6486
  • [4] pGPUMCD: an efficient GPU-based Monte Carlo code for accurate proton dose calculations
    Maneval, Daniel
    Ozell, Benoit
    Despres, Philippe
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2019, 64 (08)
  • [5] A fast GPU-based Monte Carlo simulation of proton transport with detailed modeling of nonelastic interactions
    Tseung, H. Wan Chan
    Ma, J.
    Beltran, C.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2015, 42 (06) : 2967 - 2978
  • [6] Validation of irtGPUMCD, a GPU-based Monte Carlo internal dosimetry framework for radionuclide therapy
    Frezza, Andrea
    Joachim-Paquet, Charles
    Chauvin, Maxime
    Despres, Philippe
    PHYSICA MEDICA-EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2020, 73 : 95 - 104
  • [7] GPU-based fast Monte Carlo dose calculation for proton therapy
    Jia, Xun
    Schuemann, Jan
    Paganetti, Harald
    Jiang, Steve B.
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2012, 57 (23) : 7783 - 7797
  • [8] Clinical implementation of a GPU-based simplified Monte Carlo method for a treatment planning system of proton beam therapy
    Kohno, R.
    Hotta, K.
    Nishioka, S.
    Matsubara, K.
    Tansho, R.
    Suzuki, T.
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2011, 56 (22) : N287 - N294
  • [9] MOQUI: an open-source GPU-based Monte Carlo code for proton dose calculation with efficient data structure
    Lee, Hoyeon
    Shin, Jungwook
    Verburg, Joost M.
    Bobic, Mislav
    Winey, Brian
    Schuemann, Jan
    Paganetti, Harald
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2022, 67 (17)
  • [10] Commissioning of GPU-Accelerated Monte Carlo Code FRED for Clinical Applications in Proton Therapy
    Gajewski, Jan
    Garbacz, Magdalena
    Chang, Chih-Wei
    Czerska, Katarzyna
    Durante, Marco
    Krah, Nils
    Krzempek, Katarzyna
    Kopec, Renata
    Lin, Liyong
    Mojzeszek, Natalia
    Patera, Vincenzo
    Pawlik-Niedzwiecka, Monika
    Rinaldi, Ilaria
    Rydygier, Marzena
    Pluta, Elzbieta
    Scifoni, Emanuele
    Skrzypek, Agata
    Tommasino, Francesco
    Schiavi, Angelo
    Rucinski, Antoni
    FRONTIERS IN PHYSICS, 2021, 8