Translational Abstract Replication is fundamental to science and has been receiving increased attention in psychology and related fields. Whether a replication study is deemed a "success" or a "failure" has typically been deduced from the result of a null hypothesis significance test, wherein results reaching conventional criteria for statistical significance are considered successful replications and nonsignificant results are deemed failures. Recently, scientists have been encouraged to consider other approaches, consistent with alternative goals for the replication study. However, study design, and specifically sample size planning, has often been absent from the discussion. Sample size planning should be consistent with the particular replication goal and analysis method that will be used. In the present article, we articulate four different goals for replication and we present formal sample size planning guidance for each goal. We include empirical examples and computer syntax to demonstrate each procedure in practice. Replication is central to scientific progress. Because of widely reported replication failures, replication has received increased attention in psychology, sociology, education, management, and related fields in recent years. Replication studies have generally been assessed dichotomously, designated either a "success" or "failure" based entirely on the outcome of a null hypothesis significance test (i.e., p < .05 or p > .05, respectively). However, alternative definitions of success depend on researchers' goals for the replication. Previous work on alternative definitions for success has focused on the analysis phase of replication. However, the design of the replication is also important, as emphasized with the adage, "an ounce of prevention is better than a pound of cure." One critical component of design often ignored or oversimplified in replication studies is sample size planning, indeed, the details here are crucial. Sample size planning for replication studies should correspond to the method by which success will be evaluated. Researchers have received little guidance, some of which is misguided, on sample size planning for replication goals other than the aforementioned dichotomous null hypothesis significance testing approach. In this article, we describe four different replication goals. Then, we formalize sample size planning methods for each of the four goals. This article aims to provide clarity on the procedures for sample size planning for each goal, with examples and syntax provided to show how each procedure can be used in practice.