Multivariable Diagnostic Prediction Model to Detect Hormone Secretion Profile From T2W MRI Radiomics with Artificial Neural Networks in Pituitary Adenomas

被引:7
作者
Baysal, Begumhan [1 ]
Eser, Mehmet Bilgin [1 ]
Dogan, Mahmut Bilal [1 ]
Kursun, Muhammet Arif [1 ]
机构
[1] Istanbul Goztepe Prof Dr Suleyman Yalcin City Hosp, Clin Radiol, Istanbul, Turkey
来源
MEDENIYET MEDICAL JOURNAL | 2022年 / 37卷 / 01期
关键词
Pituitary adenoma; magnetic resonance imaging; machine learning; artificial intelligence; radiomics; CONSISTENCY; IMAGES;
D O I
10.4274/MMJ.galenos.2022.58538
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective: This study aims to develop neural networks to detect hormone secretion profiles in the pituitary adenomas based on T2 weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) radiomics.Methods: This retrospective model-development study included a cohort of patients with pituitary adenomas (n=130) from January 2015 to January 2020 in one tertiary center. The mean age was 46.49 +/- 13.69 years, and 76/130 (58.46%) were women. Three observers segmented lesions on coronal T2 weighted MRI, and an interrater agreement was evaluated using the Dice coefficient. Predictors were determined as radiomics features (n=851). Feature selection was based on intraclass correlation coefficient, coefficient variance, variance inflation factor, and LASSO regression analysis. Outcomes were identified as 7 hormone secretion profiles [nonfunctioning pituitary adenoma, growth hormone-secreting adenomas, prolactinomas, adrenocorticotropic hormone-secreting adenomas, pluri-hormonal secreting adenomas (PHA), follicle-stimulating hormone and luteinizing hormone-secreting adenomas, and thyroid-stimulating hormone adenomas]. A multivariable diagnostic prediction model was developed with artificial neural networks (ANN) for 7 outcomes. ANN performance was presented as an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and accepted as successful if the AUC was >0.85 and p-value was <0.01.Results: The performance of the ANN distinguishing prolactinomas from other adenomas was validated (AUC=0.95, p<0.001, sensitivity: 91%, and specificity: 98%). The model distinguishing PHA had the lowest AUC (AUC=0.74 and p<0.001). The AUC values for the other five ANN were >0.85 and p values were <0.001.Conclusions: This study was successful in training neural networks that could differentiate the hormone secretion profile of pituitary adenomas.
引用
收藏
页码:36 / 43
页数:8
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]   The epidemiology of pituitary adenomas in Iceland, 1955-2012: a nationwide population-based study [J].
Agustsson, Tomas Thor ;
Baldvinsdottir, Tinna ;
Jonasson, Jon G. ;
Olafsdottir, Elinborg ;
Steinthorsdottir, Valgerdur ;
Sigurdsson, Gunnar ;
Thorsson, Arni V. ;
Carroll, Paul V. ;
Korbonits, Marta ;
Benediktsson, Rafn .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2015, 173 (05) :655-664
[2]  
Bossuyt PM, 2015, BMJ-BRIT MED J, V351, DOI [10.1136/bmj.h5527, 10.1373/clinchem.2015.246280, 10.1148/radiol.2015151516]
[3]   Prediction of pituitary adenoma surgical consistency: radiomic data mining and machine learning on T2-weighted MRI [J].
Cuocolo, Renato ;
Ugga, Lorenzo ;
Solari, Domenico ;
Corvino, Sergio ;
D'Amico, Alessandra ;
Russo, Daniela ;
Cappabianca, Paolo ;
Cavallo, Luigi Maria ;
Elefante, Andrea .
NEURORADIOLOGY, 2020, 62 (12) :1649-1656
[4]   CBTRUS Statistical Report: Primary Brain and Central Nervous System Tumors Diagnosed in the United States in 20052009 [J].
Dolecek, Therese A. ;
Propp, Jennifer M. ;
Stroup, Nancy E. ;
Kruchko, Carol .
NEURO-ONCOLOGY, 2012, 14 :v1-v49
[5]   ESR Statement on the Validation of Imaging Biomarkers [J].
Alberich-Bayarri A. ;
Sourbron S. ;
Golay X. ;
deSouza N. ;
Smits M. ;
van der Lugt A. ;
Boellard R. .
INSIGHTS INTO IMAGING, 2020, 11 (01)
[6]   The prevalence of pituitary adenomas - A systematic review [J].
Ezzat, S ;
Asa, SL ;
Couldwell, WT ;
Barr, CE ;
Dodge, WE ;
Vance, ML ;
McCutcheon, IE .
CANCER, 2004, 101 (03) :613-619
[7]   Preoperative Noninvasive Radiomics Approach Predicts Tumor Consistency in Patients With Acromegaly: Development and Multicenter Prospective Validation [J].
Fan, Yanghua ;
Hua, Min ;
Mou, Anna ;
Wu, Miaojing ;
Liu, Xiaohai ;
Bao, Xinjie ;
Wang, Renzhi ;
Feng, Ming .
FRONTIERS IN ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2019, 10
[8]   Ethics of Artificial Intelligence in Radiology: Summary of the Joint European and North American Multisociety Statement [J].
Geis, J. Raymond ;
Brady, Adrian P. ;
Wu, Carol C. ;
Spencer, Jack ;
Ranschaert, Erik ;
Jaremko, Jacob L. ;
Langer, Steve G. ;
Kitts, Andrea Borondy ;
Birch, Judy ;
Shields, William F. ;
van Genderen, Robert van den Hoven ;
Kotter, Elmar ;
Gichoya, Judy Wawira ;
Cook, Tessa S. ;
Morgan, Matthew B. ;
Tang, An ;
Safdar, Nabile M. ;
Kohli, Marc .
RADIOLOGY, 2019, 293 (02) :436-440
[9]   A Meta-Analysis of Endoscopic vs. Microscopic Transsphenoidal Surgery for Non-functioning and Functioning Pituitary Adenomas: Comparisons of Efficacy and Safety [J].
Guo, Shengfu ;
Wang, Zidong ;
Kang, Xiaokui ;
Xin, Wenqiang ;
Li, Xin .
FRONTIERS IN NEUROLOGY, 2021, 12
[10]   Development and Validation of a Radiomics Nomogram for Preoperative Prediction of Lymph Node Metastasis in Colorectal Cancer [J].
Huang, Yan-qi ;
Liang, Chang-hong ;
He, Lan ;
Tian, Jie ;
Liang, Cui-shan ;
Chen, Xin ;
Ma, Ze-lan ;
Liu, Zai-yi .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2016, 34 (18) :2157-+