Multipoint Aerodynamic Shape Optimization for Subsonic and Supersonic Regimes

被引:13
|
作者
Mangano, Marco [1 ]
Martins, Joaquim R. R. A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Michigan, Dept Aerosp Engn, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
来源
JOURNAL OF AIRCRAFT | 2021年 / 58卷 / 03期
关键词
MULTIFIDELITY DESIGN OPTIMIZATION; LOW-BOOM; MODEL; MULTIMODALITY; PERFORMANCE; FORMULATION; ALGORITHM;
D O I
10.2514/1.C036216
中图分类号
V [航空、航天];
学科分类号
08 ; 0825 ;
摘要
The second generation of supersonic civil transport has to match ambitious targets in terms of efficiency to be economically and environmentally viable. Computational fluid dynamics-based design optimization offers a powerful approach to address the complex tradeoffs intrinsic to this novel configuration. This approach is applied to the design of airfoils and wings at both supersonic cruise conditions and lower-speed, off-design conditions. Single and multipoint optimizations are performed to minimize drag over an ideal supersonic aircraft flight envelope and assess the influence of physical and numerical parameters on optimization accuracy and robustness. To obtain more favorable design tradeoffs between different flight regimes, morphing leading- and trailing-edge capabilities are introduced and their benefits are quantified against fixed-wing shapes. The optimized layouts outperform baseline supersonic reference designs over a range of flight conditions, with drag reductions from 4 up to 86% for airfoils and between 24 and 74% reductions relative to a reference wing. The results demonstrate that the proposed approach enables the fast and effective design of highly efficient wings, capturing nonintuitive tradeoffs and offering more in-depth physical insight into the optimal layouts.
引用
收藏
页码:650 / 662
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Aerodynamic Shape Optimization of a Symmetric Airfoil from Subsonic to Hypersonic Flight Regimes
    Leite, Bernardo
    Afonso, Frederico
    Suleman, Afzal
    FLUIDS, 2022, 7 (11)
  • [2] On the aerodynamic characteristics of a class of airfoils with continuous curvature at subsonic, transonic and supersonic regimes
    Department of Aerospace Sciences, Elie Carafoli, University Politehnica, Bucharest, Romania
    UPB Sci Bull Ser D, 2007, 1 (15-27):
  • [3] Aerodynamic Shape Optimization of Subsonic/Supersonic Flows Integrating Variable-Fidelity Longitudinal Trim Analysis
    Wu, Yacong
    Huang, Jun
    Ji, Boqian
    Song, Lei
    AEROSPACE, 2024, 11 (02)
  • [4] Optimization of subsonic aerodynamic shape by using metamodeling approach
    Janushevskis, A.
    Auzins, J.
    Janushevskis, J.
    Viba, J.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 5TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF DAAAM BALTIC INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING - ADDING INNOVATION CAPACITY OF LABOUR FORCE AND ENTREPRENEUR, 2006, : 41 - +
  • [5] Multipoint and multi-objective aerodynamic shape optimization
    Nemec, M
    Zingg, DW
    Pulliam, TH
    AIAA JOURNAL, 2004, 42 (06) : 1057 - 1065
  • [6] Multipoint and multi-objective aerodynamic shape optimization
    Nemec, M. (nemec@nas.nasa.gov), 1600, American Inst. Aeronautics and Astronautics Inc. (42):
  • [7] Multipoint Aerodynamic Shape Optimization Investigations of the Common Research Model Wing
    Kenway, Gaetan K. W.
    Martins, Joaquim R. R. A.
    AIAA JOURNAL, 2016, 54 (01) : 113 - 128
  • [8] Multipoint Aerodynamic Shape Optimization of a Truss-Braced-Wing Aircraft
    Li, Li
    Bai, Junqiang
    Qu, Feng
    JOURNAL OF AIRCRAFT, 2022, 59 (05): : 1179 - 1194
  • [9] AERODYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF SUPERSONIC AIRCRAFT WITH SUBSONIC LEADING EDGES
    SOTOMAYER, WA
    WEEKS, TM
    JOURNAL OF AIRCRAFT, 1978, 15 (07): : 399 - 406
  • [10] Biologically-inspired aerodynamic shape optimization for low Reynolds regimes
    Guilhaumon, Clara
    Arias, Jorge
    Rodriguez-Sevillano, Angel A.
    Saucedo-Mora, Luis
    Montans, Francisco
    RESULTS IN ENGINEERING, 2023, 20