Configuring challenge and hindrance contexts for introversion and creativity: Joint effects of task complexity and guanxi management

被引:29
作者
Zhang, Xiaomeng [1 ]
Zhou, Jing [2 ]
Kwan, Ho Kwong [3 ]
机构
[1] Cheung Kong Grad Sch Business, Oriental Plaza,1 East Chang An Ave, Beijing 100738, Peoples R China
[2] Rice Univ, Jesse H Jones Grad Sch Business, 6100 Main St, Houston, TX 77005 USA
[3] Shanghai Univ Finance & Econ, Sch Int Business Adm, Shanghai 200433, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Creativity; Introversion; Task complexity; Guanxi management; SUPERVISOR-SUBORDINATE GUANXI; OF-THE-SCIENCE; EMPLOYEE CREATIVITY; TRANSFORMATIONAL LEADERSHIP; JOB CHARACTERISTICS; PERSONALITY-TRAITS; 5-FACTOR MODEL; DUAL PATHWAY; PERFORMANCE; PERSPECTIVE;
D O I
10.1016/j.obhdp.2017.02.003
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
We conducted a phenomenon-based research study in China. Starting with interviews and observations to capture the phenomenon, we built on and extended the challenge stressor-hindrance stressor framework to investigate how task complexity interacts with managing guanxi with a supervisor to influence the relationship between introversion and creativity. In Study 1, using a sample of 597 employees and their supervisors, we hypothesized and found a three-way interaction effect between introversion, task complexity, and guanxi management. For employees who scored high on the introversion trait continuum, the joint condition of high task complexity and low guanxi management was the most conducive to creativity and the joint condition of low task complexity and high guanxi management was the least conducive. The beneficial effect of high task complexity and low guanxi management gradually diminished and ultimately disappeared as employees scored lower on the introversion continuum, whereas the adverse effect of low task complexity and high guanxi management gradually appeared and ultimately intensified rapidly as employees moved from lower to higher levels of introversion. In Study 2, we replicated these results using a sample of 243 employees and their supervisors from a different industry. We discuss the implications of these results for future research and management practice. (C) 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:54 / 68
页数:15
相关论文
共 113 条
  • [1] Personality and creativity
    AguilarAlonso, A
    [J]. PERSONALITY AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 1996, 21 (06) : 959 - 969
  • [2] Amabile T. M., 1996, Creativity in context: Update to the social psychology of creativity
  • [3] AMABILE TM, 1988, RES ORGAN BEHAV, V10, P123
  • [4] The routinization of innovation research: a constructively critical review of the state-of-the-science
    Anderson, N
    De Dreu, CKW
    Nijstad, BA
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR, 2004, 25 (02) : 147 - 173
  • [5] Innovation and Creativity in Organizations: A State-of-the-Science Review, Prospective Commentary, and Guiding Framework
    Anderson, Neil
    Potocnik, Kristina
    Zhou, Jing
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 2014, 40 (05) : 1297 - 1333
  • [6] [Anonymous], 2005, The Social Logic of Politics: Personal Networks as Contexts for Political Behavior
  • [7] [Anonymous], 1997, Creativity: Flow and the psychology of discovery and invention
  • [8] [Anonymous], 2012, QUIET POWER INTROVER
  • [9] [Anonymous], 2012, China Youth Daily
  • [10] [Anonymous], MOTIVATION EMOTION P