Meta-analysis of Percutaneous vs. Surgical Approaches Radiofrequency Ablation in Hepatocellular Carcinoma

被引:5
|
作者
Huang, Xiaozhun [1 ,2 ]
Liu, Yibin [3 ]
Xu, Lin [1 ,2 ]
Ma, Teng [1 ,2 ]
Yin, Xin [1 ,2 ]
Huang, Zhangkan [1 ,2 ]
Wang, Caibin [1 ,2 ]
Huang, Zhen [4 ]
Bi, Xinyu [4 ]
Che, Xu [1 ,2 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Med Sci & Peking Union Med Coll, Canc Hosp, Natl Clin Res Ctr Canc, Dept Hepatobiliary Surg,Natl Canc Ctr, Shenzhen, Peoples R China
[2] Chinese Acad Med Sci & Peking Union Med Coll, Shenzhen Hosp, Shenzhen, Peoples R China
[3] Longgang Dist Cent Hosp Shenzhen, Dept Gen Surg, Shenzhen, Peoples R China
[4] Chinese Acad Med Sci & Peking Union Med Coll, Canc Hosp, Natl Clin Res Ctr Canc, Dept Hepatobiliary Surg,Natl Canc Ctr, Beijing, Peoples R China
[5] Chinese Acad Med Sci & Peking Union Med Coll, Canc Hosp, Natl Clin Res Ctr Canc, Dept Gastrointestinal & Pancreat Surg,Natl Canc C, Beijing, Peoples R China
来源
FRONTIERS IN SURGERY | 2022年 / 8卷
关键词
radiofrequency ablation; hepatocellular carcinoma; surgical; percutaneous; meta-analysis; LIVER-TUMORS; THERMAL ABLATION; LOCAL RECURRENCE; MILAN CRITERIA; RESECTION; COMPLICATIONS; SURVIVAL; THERAPY; RISK;
D O I
10.3389/fsurg.2021.788771
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is a curative modality for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients who are not suitable for resection. It remains controversial whether a surgical or percutaneous approach is more appropriate for HCC.Method: A search was performed on the PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases from the date of database inception until April 17, 2021. Studies reporting outcomes of comparisons between surgical RFA (SRFA) and percutaneous RFA (PRFA) were included in this study. The meta-analysis was performed using the Review Manager 5.3 and Stata 12.0 software.Result: A total of 10 retrospective studies containing 12 cohorts, involving 740 patients in the PRFA group and 512 patients in the SRFA group, were selected. Although the tumor size in PRFA group was smaller than the SRFA group (p = 0.007), there was no significant difference in complete ablation rate between the SRFA and PRFA groups (95.63% and 97.33%, respectively; Odds ratio [OR], 0.56; 95% confidence intervals [CI], 0.26-1.24; p = 0.15). However, the SRFA group showed a significantly lower local tumor recurrence than the PRFA group in the sensitivity analysis (28.7% in the PRFA group and 21.79% in the SRFA group, respectively; OR, 1.84; 95% CI, 1.14-2.95; p = 0.01). Pooled analysis data showed that the rate of severe perioperative complications did not differ significantly between the PRFA and SRFA groups (14.28% and 12.11%, respectively; OR, 1.30; 95% CI, 0.67-2.53; p = 0.44). There was no significant difference in the 1-, 3-, and 5-year overall survival rates, as well as the 1- and 3-year disease-free survival (DFS) between the PRFA and SRFA groups. The 5-year DFS of the PRFA group was significantly lower than the SRFA group (hazard ratio 0.73; 95% CI 0.54-0.99).Conclusion: Based on our meta-analysis, the surgical route was superior to PRFA in terms of local control rate. Furthermore, the surgical approach did not increase the risk of major complications.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Radiofrequency ablation vs. surgical resection for resectable hepatocellular carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Li, Jia-Kai
    Liu, Xiao-Hui
    Cui, Hong
    Xie, Xin-Hui
    MOLECULAR AND CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2020, 12 (01) : 15 - 22
  • [2] Comparison of radiofrequency ablation and surgical resection for hepatocellular carcinoma conforming to the Milan criteria: a meta-analysis
    Wang, Qiang
    Tang, Maocai
    Zhang, Shouru
    ANZ JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2021, 91 (7-8) : E432 - E438
  • [3] Meta-analysis of surgical resection and radiofrequency ablation for early hepatocellular carcinoma
    Xu, Gang
    Qi, Fu-zhen
    Zhang, Jian-huai
    Cheng, Guo-feng
    Cai, Yong
    Miao, Yi
    WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2012, 10
  • [4] Surgical vs percutaneous radiofrequency ablation for hepatocellular carcinoma in dangerous locations
    Huang, Ji-Wei
    Hernandez-Alejandro, Roberto
    Croome, Kristopher P.
    Yan, Lu-Nan
    Wu, Hong
    Chen, Zhe-Yu
    Prasoon, Pankaj
    Zeng, Yong
    WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2011, 17 (01) : 123 - 129
  • [5] Clinical outcomes of radiofrequency ablation and surgical resection for small hepatocellular carcinoma: A meta-analysis
    Li, Le
    Zhang, Jialin
    Liu, Xiaohua
    Li, Xiaohang
    Jiao, Baoping
    Kang, Tieli
    JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2012, 27 (01) : 51 - 58
  • [6] Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy vs. Radiofrequency Ablation in the Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Meta-Analysis
    Pan, Yang-Xun
    Fu, Yi-Zhen
    Hu, Dan-Dan
    Long, Qian
    Wang, Jun-Cheng
    Xi, Mian
    Liu, Shi-Liang
    Xu, Li
    Liu, Meng-Zhong
    Chen, Min-Shan
    Zhang, Yao-Jun
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2020, 10
  • [7] Radiofrequency ablation versus surgical resection for intrahepatic hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence: a meta-analysis
    Chen, Xuxiao
    Chen, Yongjun
    Li, Qinyu
    Ma, Di
    Shen, Baiyong
    Peng, Chenghong
    JOURNAL OF SURGICAL RESEARCH, 2015, 195 (01) : 166 - 174
  • [8] Radiofrequency ablation versus surgical resection for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma conforming to the Milan criteria: systemic review and meta-analysis
    Yi, Hui-Ming
    Zhang, Wei
    Ai, Xi
    Li, Kai-Yan
    Deng, You-Bin
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE, 2014, 7 (10): : 3150 - 3163
  • [9] Combination of radiofrequency ablation and percutaneous ethanol injection versus radiofrequency ablation alone for hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Lu, De-En
    Cheng, Sheng-Wei
    Lin, Yang-Sheng
    Tu, Mei-Wen
    Lee, Chia-Hsiang
    Chen, Chiehfeng
    Chen, Kee-Hsin
    ANNALS OF HEPATOLOGY, 2022, 27 (05)
  • [10] Liver resection versus radiofrequency ablation for recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Yang, Yao
    Yu, Hongli
    Tan, Xu
    You, Yajing
    Liu, Fangyuan
    Zhao, Tong
    Qi, Jianni
    Li, Jie
    Feng, Yuemin
    Zhu, Qiang
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYPERTHERMIA, 2021, 38 (01) : 875 - 886