Meta-analysis of Percutaneous vs. Surgical Approaches Radiofrequency Ablation in Hepatocellular Carcinoma

被引:5
|
作者
Huang, Xiaozhun [1 ,2 ]
Liu, Yibin [3 ]
Xu, Lin [1 ,2 ]
Ma, Teng [1 ,2 ]
Yin, Xin [1 ,2 ]
Huang, Zhangkan [1 ,2 ]
Wang, Caibin [1 ,2 ]
Huang, Zhen [4 ]
Bi, Xinyu [4 ]
Che, Xu [1 ,2 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Med Sci & Peking Union Med Coll, Canc Hosp, Natl Clin Res Ctr Canc, Dept Hepatobiliary Surg,Natl Canc Ctr, Shenzhen, Peoples R China
[2] Chinese Acad Med Sci & Peking Union Med Coll, Shenzhen Hosp, Shenzhen, Peoples R China
[3] Longgang Dist Cent Hosp Shenzhen, Dept Gen Surg, Shenzhen, Peoples R China
[4] Chinese Acad Med Sci & Peking Union Med Coll, Canc Hosp, Natl Clin Res Ctr Canc, Dept Hepatobiliary Surg,Natl Canc Ctr, Beijing, Peoples R China
[5] Chinese Acad Med Sci & Peking Union Med Coll, Canc Hosp, Natl Clin Res Ctr Canc, Dept Gastrointestinal & Pancreat Surg,Natl Canc C, Beijing, Peoples R China
来源
FRONTIERS IN SURGERY | 2022年 / 8卷
关键词
radiofrequency ablation; hepatocellular carcinoma; surgical; percutaneous; meta-analysis; LIVER-TUMORS; THERMAL ABLATION; LOCAL RECURRENCE; MILAN CRITERIA; RESECTION; COMPLICATIONS; SURVIVAL; THERAPY; RISK;
D O I
10.3389/fsurg.2021.788771
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is a curative modality for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients who are not suitable for resection. It remains controversial whether a surgical or percutaneous approach is more appropriate for HCC.Method: A search was performed on the PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases from the date of database inception until April 17, 2021. Studies reporting outcomes of comparisons between surgical RFA (SRFA) and percutaneous RFA (PRFA) were included in this study. The meta-analysis was performed using the Review Manager 5.3 and Stata 12.0 software.Result: A total of 10 retrospective studies containing 12 cohorts, involving 740 patients in the PRFA group and 512 patients in the SRFA group, were selected. Although the tumor size in PRFA group was smaller than the SRFA group (p = 0.007), there was no significant difference in complete ablation rate between the SRFA and PRFA groups (95.63% and 97.33%, respectively; Odds ratio [OR], 0.56; 95% confidence intervals [CI], 0.26-1.24; p = 0.15). However, the SRFA group showed a significantly lower local tumor recurrence than the PRFA group in the sensitivity analysis (28.7% in the PRFA group and 21.79% in the SRFA group, respectively; OR, 1.84; 95% CI, 1.14-2.95; p = 0.01). Pooled analysis data showed that the rate of severe perioperative complications did not differ significantly between the PRFA and SRFA groups (14.28% and 12.11%, respectively; OR, 1.30; 95% CI, 0.67-2.53; p = 0.44). There was no significant difference in the 1-, 3-, and 5-year overall survival rates, as well as the 1- and 3-year disease-free survival (DFS) between the PRFA and SRFA groups. The 5-year DFS of the PRFA group was significantly lower than the SRFA group (hazard ratio 0.73; 95% CI 0.54-0.99).Conclusion: Based on our meta-analysis, the surgical route was superior to PRFA in terms of local control rate. Furthermore, the surgical approach did not increase the risk of major complications.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Radiofrequency ablation vs. surgical resection for resectable hepatocellular carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Li, Jia-Kai
    Liu, Xiao-Hui
    Cui, Hong
    Xie, Xin-Hui
    MOLECULAR AND CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2020, 12 (01) : 15 - 22
  • [2] Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy vs. Radiofrequency Ablation in the Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Meta-Analysis
    Pan, Yang-Xun
    Fu, Yi-Zhen
    Hu, Dan-Dan
    Long, Qian
    Wang, Jun-Cheng
    Xi, Mian
    Liu, Shi-Liang
    Xu, Li
    Liu, Meng-Zhong
    Chen, Min-Shan
    Zhang, Yao-Jun
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2020, 10
  • [3] Meta-analysis of surgical resection and radiofrequency ablation for early hepatocellular carcinoma
    Gang Xu
    Fu-zhen Qi
    Jian-huai Zhang
    Guo-feng Cheng
    Yong Cai
    Yi Miao
    World Journal of Surgical Oncology, 10
  • [4] Commentary: Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy vs. Radiofrequency Ablation in the Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Meta-Analysis
    Li, Zhaonan
    Jiao, Dechao
    Han, Xinwei
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2021, 11
  • [5] Meta-analysis of surgical resection and radiofrequency ablation for early hepatocellular carcinoma
    Xu, Gang
    Qi, Fu-zhen
    Zhang, Jian-huai
    Cheng, Guo-feng
    Cai, Yong
    Miao, Yi
    WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2012, 10
  • [6] Surgical vs percutaneous radiofrequency ablation for hepatocellular carcinoma in dangerous locations
    Roberto Hernandez-Alejandro
    Kristopher P Croome
    Pankaj Prasoon
    World Journal of Gastroenterology, 2011, 17 (01) : 123 - 129
  • [7] Surgical vs percutaneous radiofrequency ablation for hepatocellular carcinoma in dangerous locations
    Huang, Ji-Wei
    Hernandez-Alejandro, Roberto
    Croome, Kristopher P.
    Yan, Lu-Nan
    Wu, Hong
    Chen, Zhe-Yu
    Prasoon, Pankaj
    Zeng, Yong
    WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2011, 17 (01) : 123 - 129
  • [8] A systematic review and meta-analysis of the comparison of laparoscopic radiofrequency ablation to percutaneous radiofrequency ablation for hepatocellular carcinoma
    Wang, Ya-Qiong
    Tan, Zhen-Kun
    Peng, Zha
    Huang, Hai
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2025, 15
  • [9] Radiofrequency Thermal Ablation vs. Percutaneous Ethanol Injection for Small Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Cirrhosis: Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Orlando, Ambrogio
    Leandro, Gioacchino
    Olivo, Mirko
    Andriulli, Angelo
    Cottone, Mario
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2009, 104 (02): : 514 - 524
  • [10] Meta-analysis of percutaneous radiofrequency ablation versus ethanol injection in hepatocellular carcinoma
    Carmen Bouza
    Teresa López-Cuadrado
    Raimundo Alcázar
    Zuleika Saz-Parkinson
    José María Amate
    BMC Gastroenterology, 9