Low relapse with oral antibiotics and two-stage exchange for late arthroplasty infections in 40 patients after 2-9 years

被引:38
作者
Cordero-Ampuero, Jose [1 ]
Esteban, Jaime
Garcia-Cimbrelo, Eduardo
Munuera, Luis
Escobar, Ricardo
机构
[1] La Princesa Univ Hosp, Dept Orthopaed, Madrid, Spain
[2] Fdn Jimenez Diaz, Dept Microbiol, E-28040 Madrid, Spain
[3] La Paz Univ Hosp, Dept Orthopaed, Madrid, Spain
关键词
D O I
10.1080/17453670710014167
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background and purpose Exchange surgery in late arthroplasty infection is directed against bacteria adhering to implants. Therapies based on antibiotics that are effective intracellularly have been proposed recently. We have combined both strategies to improve the cure rate. Methods 40 consecutive patients (16 hips, 24 knees) were diagnosed with late arthroplasty infection. The organisms isolated were 35 Staphylococcus, 19 of which were methicillin-resistant, 4 Enterococcus, 6 Gram-negative bacilli, and 4 Corynebacterium. The infections were managed by a combined therapy consisting of two-stage exchange surgery and two oral intracellularly-effective antibiotics. The antibiotics were selected according to bacterial sensitivity and intracellular and biofilm effectiveness. Second re-implantation surgery was delayed until clinical and analytical normalization. Patients were in hospital for only 1 week after each surgery, and were followed up prospectively on an outpatient basis (2-9 years). Cure of the infection was defined as absence of clinical, serological, and radiographic signs of infection during the whole follow-up. Results The infection was resolved in 38/40 patients (15/16 hips and 23/24 knees). Interpretation Oral antibiotics that are effective intracellularly in combination with two-stage exchange surgery is a promising alternative for treating late arthroplasty infections. Oral antibiotics shorten hospitalization and reduce patient discomfort.
引用
收藏
页码:511 / 519
页数:9
相关论文
共 44 条
[1]  
BOOTH RE, 1989, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, P57
[2]   Staphylococcus aureus prosthetic joint infection treated with debridement and prosthesis retention [J].
Brandt, CM ;
Sistrunk, WW ;
Duffy, MC ;
Hanssen, AD ;
Steckelberg, JM ;
Ilstrup, DM ;
Osmon, DR .
CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 1997, 24 (05) :914-919
[3]  
Callaghan JJ, 1999, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, P139
[4]   Periprosthetic total joint infections - Staging, treatment, and outcomes [J].
Cierny, G ;
DiPasquale, D .
CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2002, (403) :23-28
[5]  
COLYER RA, 1994, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, P75
[6]  
Cordero J., 2000, HIP INT, V10, P139
[7]   Biofilm theory can guide the treatment of device-related orthopaedic infections [J].
Costerton, JW .
CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2005, (437) :7-11
[8]   ORAL RIFAMPIN PLUS OFLOXACIN FOR TREATMENT OF STAPHYLOCOCCUS-INFECTED ORTHOPEDIC IMPLANTS [J].
DRANCOURT, M ;
STEIN, A ;
ARGENSON, JN ;
ZANNIER, A ;
CURVALE, G ;
RAOULT, D .
ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY, 1993, 37 (06) :1214-1218
[9]   Intracellular Staphylococcus aureus and antibiotic resistance:: Implications for treatment of staphylococcal osteomyelitis [J].
Ellington, JK ;
Harris, M ;
Hudson, MC ;
Vishin, S ;
Webb, LX ;
Sherertz, R .
JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC RESEARCH, 2006, 24 (01) :87-93
[10]   Intracellular Staphylococcus aureus -: A mechanism for the indolence of osteomyelitis [J].
Ellington, JK ;
Harris, M ;
Webb, L ;
Smith, B ;
Smith, T ;
Tan, K ;
Hudson, M .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 2003, 85B (06) :918-921