Steps toward improving ethical evaluation in health technology assessment: a proposed framework

被引:27
作者
Assasi, Nazila [1 ,2 ]
Tarride, Jean-Eric [1 ,2 ]
O'Reilly, Daria [1 ,2 ]
Schwartz, Lisa [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] McMaster Univ, Dept Clin Epidemiol & Biostat, Hamilton, ON, Canada
[2] St Josephs Healthcare, PATH, Hamilton, ON, Canada
[3] McMaster Univ, Ctr Hlth Econ & Policy Anal, Hamilton, ON, Canada
来源
BMC MEDICAL ETHICS | 2016年 / 17卷
关键词
Ethics; Health technology assessment; Framework; Model; Tools; ISSUES; INFORMATION; DECISIONS; CRITERIA;
D O I
10.1186/s12910-016-0118-0
中图分类号
B82 [伦理学(道德学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: While evaluation of ethical aspects in health technology assessment (HTA) has gained much attention during the past years, the integration of ethics in HTA practice still presents many challenges. In response to the increasing demand for expansion of health technology assessment (HTA) methodology to include ethical issues more systematically, this article reports on a multi-stage study that aimed at construction of a framework for improving the integration of ethics in HTA. Methods: The framework was developed through the following phases: 1) a systematic review and content analysis of guidance documents for ethics in HTA; 2) identification of factors influencing the integration of ethical considerations in HTA; 3) preparation of an action-oriented framework based on the key elements of the existing guidance documents and identified barriers to and facilitators of their implementation; and 4) expert consultation and revision of the framework. Results: The proposed framework consists of three main components: an algorithmic flowchart, which exhibits the different steps of an ethical inquiry throughout the HTA process, including: defining the objectives and scope of the evaluation, stakeholder analysis, assessing organizational capacity, framing ethical evaluation questions, ethical analysis, deliberation, and knowledge translation; a stepwise guide, which focuses on the task objectives and potential questions that are required to be addressed at each step; and a list of some commonly recommended or used tools to help facilitate the evaluation process. Conclusions: The proposed framework can be used to support and promote good practice in integration of ethics into HTA. However, further validation of the framework through case studies and expert consultation is required to establish its utility for HTA practice.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]   Deliberations about deliberative methods: issues in the design and evaluation of public participation processes [J].
Abelson, J ;
Forest, PG ;
Eyles, J ;
Smith, P ;
Martin, E ;
Gauvin, FP .
SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 2003, 57 (02) :239-251
[2]   Bringing 'the public' into health technology assessment and coverage policy decisions: From principles to practice [J].
Abelson, Julia ;
Giacomini, Mita ;
Lehoux, Pascale ;
Gauvin, Francois-Pieffe .
HEALTH POLICY, 2007, 82 (01) :37-50
[3]   Strategic Management of Stakeholders: Theory and Practice [J].
Ackermann, Fran ;
Eden, Colin .
LONG RANGE PLANNING, 2011, 44 (03) :179-196
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2005, POIESIS PRAXIS, DOI DOI 10.1007/S10202-005-0073-1
[5]  
[Anonymous], METHODENHANDBUCH HTA
[6]   BARRIERS AND FACILITATORS INFLUENCING ETHICAL EVALUATION IN HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT [J].
Assasi, Nazila ;
Schwartz, Lisa ;
Tarride, Jean-Eric ;
O'Reilly, Daria ;
Goeree, Ron .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT IN HEALTH CARE, 2015, 31 (03) :113-123
[7]   Methodological guidance documents for evaluation of ethical considerations in health technology assessment: a systematic review [J].
Assasi, Nazila ;
Schwartz, Lisa ;
Tarride, Jean-Eric ;
Campbell, Kaitryn ;
Goeree, Ron .
EXPERT REVIEW OF PHARMACOECONOMICS & OUTCOMES RESEARCH, 2014, 14 (02) :203-220
[8]  
DROSTE S, 2003, METHODEN ERFASSUNG E
[9]   Information on ethical issues in health technology assessment: How and where to find them [J].
Droste, Sigrid ;
Dintsios, Charalabos-Markos ;
Gerber, Andreas .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT IN HEALTH CARE, 2010, 26 (04) :441-449
[10]  
European Network for Health Technology Assessment (EUnetHTA), 2014, HTA COR MOD ONL VERS