Semi-automated adjusted measurement of nuchal translucency: feasibility and reproducibility

被引:12
作者
Grange, G. [1 ]
Althuser, M. [2 ]
Fresson, J. [3 ]
Bititi, A.
Miyamoto, K. [4 ]
Tsatsaris, V.
Morel, O.
机构
[1] Paris Descartes Univ, GHU Cochin St Vincent de Paul, AP HP, Serv Obstet, F-75679 Paris 14, France
[2] CHU Grenoble, Serv Gynecol Obstet, F-38043 Grenoble, France
[3] Univ Nancy 1, Matern Reg Univ Nancy, Nancy, France
[4] Aloka Co Ltd, Tokyo, Japan
关键词
border detection; first-trimester screening; nuchal translucency; semi-automatic measurement; 1ST TRIMESTER; REPEATABILITY; TRISOMY-21; PREGNANCY; AGREEMENT; THICKNESS;
D O I
10.1002/uog.8817
中图分类号
O42 [声学];
学科分类号
070206 ; 082403 ;
摘要
Objective The variability of nuchal translucency thickness (NT) measurements in the first trimester appears to be associated in part with caliper placement. Methods for obtaining semi-automated adjusted measurements (SAAMs) can provide several NT values (maximum, minimum, mean and median) automatically within a manually set frame in the zone of interest. This study sought to assess the feasibility and reproducibility of these SAAM-NTs. Methods Three readers, two experts and one less experienced, examined archive images of 160 patients and obtained SAAM-NTs from them, on two separate occasions. The intra-and interobserver reproducibility were assessed by calculating the intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) for maximum, mean and median SAAM-NTs, and Bland-Altman plots were constructed. Results SAAM-NTs were technically feasible for all 160 images. The range of ICCs for intraobserver reproducibility was 0.76-0.93 for mean SAAM-NT, 0.76-0.95 for median SAAM-NT and 0.74-0.95 for maximum SAAM-NT. Interobserver ICCs were 0.85, 0.85 and 0.84 for mean SAAM-NT, median SAAM-NT and maximum SAAM-NT, respectively. There were no significant differences for intra-and interobserver reproducibility of median, mean and maximum SAAM-NTs. Conclusions SAAM-NT is feasible with a high level of intra-and interobserver reproducibility. This easy-to-use method has the potential to simplify screening during the first trimester. It should be evaluated further and compared with the manual measurement method. Copyright (C) 2011 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:335 / 340
页数:6
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]   Semiautomated ultrasonographic measurement of fetal nuchal translucency using a computer software tool [J].
Bernardino, F ;
Cardoso, R ;
Montenegro, N ;
Bernardes, J ;
de Sa, JM .
ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 1998, 24 (01) :51-54
[2]   STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT [J].
BLAND, JM ;
ALTMAN, DG .
LANCET, 1986, 1 (8476) :307-310
[3]   THE MEASUREMENT OF NUCHAL TRANSLUCENCY WITH TRANSABDOMINAL AND TRANSVAGINAL SONOGRAPHY - SUCCESS RATES, REPEATABILITY AND LEVELS OF AGREEMENT [J].
BRAITHWAITE, JM ;
ECONOMIDES, DL .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 1995, 68 (811) :720-723
[4]   Nuchal translucency measurements: Frequency distribution and changes with gestation in a general population [J].
Braithwaite, JM ;
Morris, RW ;
Economides, DL .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 1996, 103 (12) :1201-1204
[5]   Ethics is an essential dimension of first-trimester risk assessment for trisomy 21 [J].
Chervenak, Frank A. ;
McCullough, Laurence B. .
SEMINARS IN ULTRASOUND CT AND MRI, 2008, 29 (02) :132-135
[6]   New rules for prenatal screening for T21: Collateral damages [J].
Grange, G. .
GYNECOLOGIE OBSTETRIQUE & FERTILITE, 2010, 38 (01) :4-5
[7]   Implementation of nuchal translucency image-scoring method during ongoing audit [J].
Herman, A ;
Dreazen, E ;
Maymon, R ;
Tovbin, Y ;
Bukovsky, I ;
Weinraub, Z .
ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 1999, 14 (06) :388-392
[8]   Image magnification does not contribute to the repeatability of caliper placement in measuring nuchal translucency thickness [J].
Herman, A ;
Maymon, R ;
Dreazen, E ;
Caspi, E ;
Bukovsky, I ;
Weinraub, Z .
ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 1998, 11 (04) :266-270
[9]   Effect of deviation of nuchal translucency measurements on the performance of screening for trisomy 21 [J].
Kagan, K. O. ;
Wright, D. ;
Etchegaray, A. ;
Zhou, Y. ;
Nicolaides, K. H. .
ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2009, 33 (06) :657-664
[10]  
Kornman LH, 1996, PRENATAL DIAG, V16, P797, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0223(199609)16:9<797::AID-PD948>3.3.CO