Nine μg intradermal influenza vaccine and 15 μg intramuscular influenza vaccine induce similar cellular and humoral immune responses in adults

被引:8
作者
Nougarede, Nolwenn [1 ]
Bisceglia, Helene [1 ]
Rozieres, Aurore [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Goujon, Catherine [5 ]
Boudet, Florence [1 ]
Laurent, Philippe [6 ]
Vanbervliet, Beatrice [2 ,3 ]
Rodet, Karen [2 ,3 ,5 ]
Hennino, Ana [2 ,3 ]
Nicolas, Jean-Francois [2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Sanofi Pasteur, Marcy Letoile, France
[2] INSERM, U1111, F-69008 Lyon, France
[3] IFR128, BioSci Lyon Gerland, Lyon, France
[4] Univ Lyon 1, UFR Lyon Sud Charles Merieux, F-69365 Lyon, France
[5] Hosp Civils Lyon, Unite Rech Clin Immunol Lyon Sud, Pierre Benite, France
[6] Becton Dickinson BD Med Pharmaceut Syst, Le Pont De Claix, France
关键词
intradermal influenza vaccine; intramuscular vaccination; immunogenicity; trivalent influenza vaccine; adult; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED SAFETY; ANTIBODY-RESPONSES; TRANSCUTANEOUS VACCINATION; SEROLOGICAL TECHNIQUES; IMMUNOGENICITY TRIAL; DENDRITIC CELLS; VIRUS-INFECTION; YOUNG-CHILDREN; HEALTHY-ADULTS; SYSTEM;
D O I
10.4161/hv.29695
中图分类号
Q81 [生物工程学(生物技术)]; Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 0836 ; 090102 ; 100705 ;
摘要
Intanza (R) 9 mu g (Sanofi Pasteur), a trivalent split-virion vaccine administered by intradermal (ID) injection, was approved in Europe in 2009 for the prevention of seasonal influenza in adults 18 to 59 years. Here, we examined the immune responses induced in adults by the ID 9 mu g vaccine and the standard trivalent intramuscular (IM) vaccine (Vaxigrip (R) 15 mu g, Sanofi Pasteur). This trial was a randomized, controlled, single-center, open-label study in healthy adults 18 to 40 years of age during the 2007/8 influenza season. Subjects received a single vaccination with the ID 9 mu g (n = 38) or IM 15 mu g (n = 42) vaccine. Serum, saliva, and peripheral blood mononuclear cells were collected up to 180 days post-vaccination. Geometric mean hemagglutination inhibition titers, seroprotection rates, seroconversion rates, and pre-vaccination-to-post-vaccination ratios of geometric mean hemagglutination inhibition titers did not differ between the two vaccines. Compared with pre-vaccination, the vaccines induced similar increases in vaccine-specific circulating B cells at day 7 but did not induce significant increases in vaccine-specific memory B cells at day 180. Cell-mediated immunity to all three vaccine strains, measured in peripheral blood mononuclear cells, was high at baseline and not increased by either vaccine. Neither vaccine induced a mucosal immune response. These results show that the humoral and cellular immune responses to the ID 9 mu g vaccine are similar to those to the standard IM 15 mu g vaccine.
引用
收藏
页码:2713 / 2720
页数:8
相关论文
共 39 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], NOT GUID HARM REQ IN
  • [2] Head-to-head comparison of an intradermal and a virosome influenza vaccine in patients over the age of 60 Evaluation of immunogenicity, cross-protection, safety and tolerability
    Ansaldi, Filippo
    Orsi, Andrea
    de Florentiis, Daniela
    Parodi, Valentina
    Rappazzo, Emanuela
    Coppelli, Martina
    Durando, Paolo
    Icardi, Giancarlo
    [J]. HUMAN VACCINES & IMMUNOTHERAPEUTICS, 2013, 9 (03) : 591 - 598
  • [3] Intanza® 15 mcg intradermal influenza vaccine elicits cross-reactive antibody responses against heterologous A(H3N2) influenza viruses
    Ansaldi, Filippo
    Canepa, Paola
    Ceravolo, Antonella
    Valle, Laura
    de Florentiis, Daniela
    Oomen, Raymond
    Vogel, Frederick R.
    Denis, Martine
    Samson, Sandrine I.
    Icardi, Giancarlo
    [J]. VACCINE, 2012, 30 (18) : 2908 - 2913
  • [4] Comparative immunogenicity of trivalent influenza vaccine administered by intradermal or intramuscular route in healthy adults
    Belshe, Robert B.
    Newman, Frances K.
    Wilkins, Ken
    Graham, Irene L.
    Babusis, Elizabeth
    Ewell, Marian
    Frey, Sharon E.
    [J]. VACCINE, 2007, 25 (37-38) : 6755 - 6763
  • [5] Intradermal influenza vaccination of healthy adults using a new microinjection system: a 3-year randomised controlled safety and immunogenicity trial
    Beran, Jiri
    Ambrozaitis, Arvydas
    Laiskonis, Alvydas
    Mickuviene, Narseta
    Bacart, Patrick
    Calozet, Yvan
    Demanet, Etienne
    Heijmans, Stephane
    Van Belle, Paul
    Weber, Francoise
    Salamand, Camille
    [J]. BMC MEDICINE, 2009, 7
  • [6] Effects of repeated annual influenza vaccination on vaccine sero-response in young and elderly adults
    Beyer, WEP
    Palache, AM
    Sprenger, MJW
    Hendriksen, E
    Tukker, JJ
    Darioli, R
    vanderWater, GL
    Masurel, N
    Osterhaus, ADME
    [J]. VACCINE, 1996, 14 (14) : 1331 - 1339
  • [7] Vaccination coverage rates in eleven European countries during two consecutive influenza seasons
    Blank, Patricia R.
    Schwenkglenks, Matthias
    Szucs, Thomas D.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INFECTION, 2009, 58 (06) : 446 - 458
  • [8] Brandtzaeg P, 2003, Dev Biol (Basel), V115, P39
  • [9] Comparison of neutralizing and hemagglutination-inhibiting antibody responses for evaluating the seasonal influenza vaccine
    Cheng, Li-Wei
    Huang, Sheng-Wen
    Huang, Li-Min
    Chang, Luan-Yin
    Shao, Pei-Lan
    Kiang, David
    Wang, Jen-Ren
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VIROLOGICAL METHODS, 2012, 182 (1-2) : 43 - 49
  • [10] Discordance between antibody and T cell responses in recipients of trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine
    Co, Mary Dawn T.
    Orphin, Laura
    Cruz, John
    Pazoles, Pamela
    Rothman, Alan L.
    Ennis, Francis A.
    Terajima, Masanori
    [J]. VACCINE, 2008, 26 (16) : 1990 - 1998