Fear of analgesic side effects predicts preference for acupuncture: a cross-sectional study of cancer patients with pain in the USA

被引:19
作者
Liou, Kevin T. [1 ,2 ]
Trevino, Kelly M. [3 ]
Meghani, Salimah H. [4 ]
Li, Q. Susan [1 ]
Deng, Gary [1 ,2 ]
Korenstein, Deborah [5 ,6 ]
Mao, Jun J. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Dept Med, Integrat Med Serv, 1429 First Ave, New York, NY 10021 USA
[2] Weill Cornell Med, Dept Med, New York, NY 10065 USA
[3] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Dept Psychiat & Behav Sci, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY 10021 USA
[4] Univ Penn, Sch Nursing, Dept Biobehav Hlth Sci, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[5] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Dept Med, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY 10021 USA
[6] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Ctr Hlth Policy & Outcomes, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY 10021 USA
关键词
Cancer; Pain management; Barriers; Preference; Acupuncture; Analgesics; Opioids; ALTERNATIVE MEDICINE USE; EDUCATIONAL INTERVENTIONS; AFRICAN-AMERICANS; OPIOID ANALGESICS; BARRIERS; MANAGEMENT; SURVIVORS; COMPLEMENTARY; OUTPATIENTS; PREVALENCE;
D O I
10.1007/s00520-020-05504-y
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose Approximately one in two cancer patients globally are under-treated for pain. Opioids and other analgesics represent the mainstay of cancer pain management; however, barriers to their use are well-documented. We evaluated whether acupuncture would be a preferable treatment option among cancer patients with attitudinal barriers to pharmacological pain management. Methods We conducted a cross-sectional survey of cancer patients at a tertiary urban cancer center and eleven suburban/rural hospitals in the Northeastern United States. We assessed attitudinal barriers to pharmacological pain management with the Barriers Questionnaire (BQ-13). The BQ-13 consists of two subscales: pain management beliefs and analgesic side effects. We also asked patients whether they prefer acupuncture, analgesics, or have no preference between these two modalities for pain management. Covariates included sociodemographics, clinical characteristics, and attitudes/beliefs about acupuncture. We used logistic regression to examine the association between attitudinal barriers and acupuncture preference. Results Among 628 patients, 197 (31.4%) preferred acupuncture for pain management, 146 (23.3%) preferred analgesics, and 285 (45.4%) had no preference. The highest reported attitudinal barriers were fear of addiction and fear of analgesic-associated constipation and nausea. Adjusting for covariates, we found that attitudinal barriers related to fear of analgesic side effects were significantly associated with acupuncture preference (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 1.45, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.17-1.81), but barriers related to pain management beliefs were not (AOR 1.17, 95% CI 0.91-1.51). Attitudes/beliefs about acupuncture (i.e., greater expected benefits, fewer perceived barriers, and more positive social norms) and female gender also predicted acupuncture preference, whereas race and educational status did not. Conclusion Acupuncture may be a preferable treatment option among cancer patients at risk of inadequately controlled pain due to fear of analgesic side effects. Evidence-based integration of acupuncture and analgesics, guided by patient treatment preferences, represents an essential aspect of patient-centered care and has potential to address unmet cancer pain management needs.
引用
收藏
页码:427 / 435
页数:9
相关论文
共 54 条
[1]   Educational interventions for cancer pain. A systematic review of systematic reviews with nested narrative review of randomized controlled trials [J].
Adam, Rosalind ;
Bond, Christine ;
Murchie, Peter .
PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2015, 98 (03) :269-282
[2]  
[Anonymous], CLIN PRACT GUID ONC
[3]  
[Anonymous], NONM TREATM PAIN
[4]  
[Anonymous], US COMPL ALT MED US
[5]   Sex differences in pain: a brief review of clinical and experimental findings [J].
Bartley, E. J. ;
Fillingim, R. B. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2013, 111 (01) :52-58
[6]   Patients as healthcare consumers in the public and private sectors: a qualitative study of acupuncture in the UK [J].
Bishop, Felicity L. ;
Barlow, Fiona ;
Coghlan, Beverly ;
Lee, Philippa ;
Lewith, George T. .
BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2011, 11
[7]   Pain Barriers Psychometrics of a 13-Item Questionnaire [J].
Boyd-Seale, Debra ;
Wilkie, Diana J. ;
Kim, Young Ok ;
Suarez, Marie L. ;
Lee, Hilary ;
Molokie, Robert ;
Zhao, Zhongsheng ;
Zong, Shiping .
NURSING RESEARCH, 2010, 59 (02) :93-101
[8]   Cancer and Opioids: Patient Experiences With Stigma (COPES)-A Pilot Study [J].
Bulls, Hailey W. ;
Hoogland, Aasha I. ;
Craig, David ;
Paice, Judith ;
Chang, Young Doo ;
Oberoi-Jassal, Ritika ;
Rajasekhara, Sahana ;
Haas, Meghan ;
Bobonis, Margarita ;
Gonzalez, Brian D. ;
Portman, Diane ;
Jim, Heather S. L. .
JOURNAL OF PAIN AND SYMPTOM MANAGEMENT, 2019, 57 (04) :816-819
[9]   A Randomized Clinical Trial of Group Acupuncture for Painful Diabetic Neuropathy Among Diverse Safety Net Patients [J].
Chao, Maria T. ;
Schillinger, Dean ;
Nguyen, Unity ;
Santana, Trilce ;
Liu, Rhianon ;
Gregorich, Steve ;
Hecht, Frederick M. .
PAIN MEDICINE, 2019, 20 (11) :2292-2302
[10]   Systematic review and meta-analysis of acupuncture to reduce cancer-related pain [J].
Chiu, H. Y. ;
Hsieh, Y. J. ;
Tsai, P. S. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER CARE, 2017, 26 (02)