Prognostic impact of clinicopathologic parameters in stage II/III breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant docetaxel and doxorubicin chemotherapy: paradoxical features of the triple negative breast cancer

被引:113
作者
Keam, Bhumsuk [1 ]
Im, Seock-Ah [1 ,6 ]
Kim, Hee-Jun [1 ]
Oh, Do-Youn [1 ,6 ]
Kim, Jee Hyun [1 ,6 ]
Lee, Se-Hoon [1 ,6 ]
Chie, Eui Kyu [2 ]
Han, Wonshik [3 ]
Kim, Dong-Wan [1 ,6 ]
Moon, Woo Kyung [4 ]
Kim, Tae-You [1 ,6 ]
Park, In Ae [5 ]
Noh, Dong-Young [3 ]
Heo, Dae Seog [1 ,6 ]
Ha, Sung Whan [2 ]
Bang, Yung-Jue [1 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Seoul Natl Univ, Coll Med, Dept Internal Med, Seoul 151, South Korea
[2] Seoul Natl Univ, Coll Med, Dept Radiat Oncol, Seoul, South Korea
[3] Seoul Natl Univ, Coll Med, Dept Surg, Seoul, South Korea
[4] Seoul Natl Univ, Coll Med, Dept Radiol, Seoul, South Korea
[5] Seoul Natl Univ, Coll Med, Dept Pathol, Seoul 151, South Korea
[6] Seoul Natl Univ, Coll Med, Canc Res Inst, Seoul, South Korea
关键词
D O I
10.1186/1471-2407-7-203
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: Prognostic factors in locally advanced breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy differ from those of early breast cancer. The purpose of this study was to identify the clinical significance of potential predictive and prognostic factors in breast cancer patients treated by neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Methods: A total of 145 stage II and III breast cancer patients received neoadjuvant docetaxel/doxorubicin chemotherapy were enrolled in this study. We examined the clinical and biological factors (ER, PR, p53, c-erbB2, bcl-2, and Ki-67) by immunohistochemistry. We analyzed clinical outcome and their correlation with clinicopathologic parameters. Results: Among the clinicopathologic parameters investigated, none of the marker was correlated with response rate (RR) except triple negative phenotype. Patients with triple negative phenotype showed higher RR (83.0% in triple negative vs. 62.2% in non-triple negative, p = 0.012) and pathologic complete RR (17.0% in triple negative vs. 3.1% in non-triple negative, p = 0.005). However, relapse free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) were significantly shorter in triple negative breast cancer patients (p < 0.001, p = 0.021, respectively). Low histologic grade, positive hormone receptors, positive bcl-2 and low level of Ki-67 were associated with prolonged RFS. In addition, positive ER and positive bcl-2 were associated with prolonged OS. In our homogeneous patient population, initial clinical stage reflects RFS and OS more precisely than pathologic stage. In multivariate analysis, initial clinical stage was the only significant independent prognostic factor to impact on OS (hazard ratio 3.597, p = 0.044). Conclusion: Several molecular markers provided useful predictive and prognostic information in stage II and III breast cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant docetaxel/doxorubicin chemotherapy. Triple negative phenotype was associated with shorter survival, even though it was associated with a higher response rate to neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 39 条
  • [1] Towards a novel classification of human malignancies based on gene expression patterns
    Alizadeh, AA
    Ross, DT
    Perou, CM
    van de Rijn, M
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PATHOLOGY, 2001, 195 (01) : 41 - 52
  • [2] The effect on tumor response of adding sequential preoperative docetaxel to preoperative doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide: Preliminary results from national surgical adjuvant breast and bowel project protocol B-27
    Bear, HD
    Anderson, S
    Brown, A
    Smith, R
    Mamounas, EP
    Fisher, B
    Margolese, R
    Theoret, H
    Soran, A
    Wickerham, DL
    Wolmark, N
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2003, 21 (22) : 4165 - 4174
  • [3] Locally advanced/inflammatory breast cancers treated with intensive epirubicin-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy: are there molecular markers in the primary tumour that predict for 5-year clinical outcome?
    Bonnefoi, H
    Diebold-Berger, S
    Therasse, P
    Hamilton, A
    van de Vijver, M
    MacGrogan, G
    Shepherd, L
    Amaral, N
    Duval, C
    Drijkoningen, R
    Larsimont, D
    Piccart, M
    [J]. ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2003, 14 (03) : 406 - 413
  • [4] Bottini A, 2000, CLIN CANCER RES, V6, P2751
  • [5] Molecular classification and molecular forecasting of breast cancer: Ready for clinical application?
    Brenton, JD
    Carey, LA
    Ahmed, AA
    Caldas, C
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2005, 23 (29) : 7350 - 7360
  • [6] American joint committee on cancer tumor-node-metastasis stage after neoadjuvant chemotherapy and breast cancer outcome
    Carey, LA
    Metzger, R
    Dees, EC
    Collichio, F
    Sartor, CI
    Ollila, DW
    Klauber-DeMore, N
    Halle, J
    Sawyer, L
    Moore, DT
    Graham, ML
    [J]. JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2005, 97 (15): : 1137 - 1142
  • [7] The triple negative paradox: Primary tumor chemosensitivity of breast cancer subtypes
    Carey, Lisa A.
    Dees, E. Claire
    Sawyer, Lynda
    Gatti, Lisa
    Moore, Dominic T.
    Collichio, Frances
    Ollila, David W.
    Sartor, Carolyn I.
    Graham, Mark L.
    Perou, Charles M.
    [J]. CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH, 2007, 13 (08) : 2329 - 2334
  • [8] Biologic markers as predictors of clinical outcome from systemic therapy for primary operable breast cancer
    Chang, J
    Powles, TJ
    Allred, DC
    Ashey, SE
    Clark, GM
    Makris, A
    Assersohn, L
    Gregory, RK
    Osborne, CK
    Dowsett, M
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1999, 17 (10) : 3058 - 3063
  • [9] Is Nottingham prognostic index useful after induction chemotherapy in operable breast cancer?
    Chollet, P
    Amat, S
    Belembaogo, E
    Curé, H
    de Latour, M
    Dauplat, J
    Le Bouëdec, G
    Mouret-Raynier, MA
    Ferrière, JP
    Penault-Llorca, F
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2003, 89 (07) : 1185 - 1191
  • [10] Prognostic significance of a complete pathological response after induction chemotherapy in operable breast cancer
    Chollet, P
    Amat, S
    Cure, H
    de Latour, M
    Le Bouedec, G
    Mouret-Reynier, MA
    Ferriere, JP
    Achard, JL
    Dauplat, J
    Penault-Llorca, F
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2002, 86 (07) : 1041 - 1046