Randomized controlled study comparing misoprostol moistened with normal saline and with acetic acid for second-trimester pregnancy termination. Is it different?

被引:7
作者
Pongsatha, Saipin [1 ]
Tongsong, Theera [1 ]
机构
[1] Chiang Mai Univ, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Fac Med, Maharaj Nakorn Chiang Mai Hosp, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand
关键词
acetic acid; misoprostol; normal saline; pregnancy termination; VAGINAL MISOPROSTOL; 3; REGIMENS; ABORTION; TABLETS; TRIAL;
D O I
10.1111/j.1447-0756.2010.01458.x
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: To compare the efficacy and adverse effects of 400 mu g intravaginal misoprostol for second-trimester pregnancy termination in live fetuses between two groups: one in which misoprostol was moistened with normal saline solution (NSS) and the other in which misoprostol was moistened with acetic acid. Materials and Methods: A total of 179 pregnant women between 14 and 28 weeks of gestation with live fetuses indicated for pregnancy termination were recruited. They were randomly allocated to receive 400 mu g intravaginal misoprostol either moistened with NSS (n = 96) or moistened with acetic acid (n = 83). The same dosage was then repeated every 3 h if adequate uterine contractions were not achieved until 48 h after the initiation of misoprostol. The main outcomes were mean abortion time, success rate, and adverse effects. Results: The mean abortion time was not significantly different between the groups (24.98 +/- 16.42 h vs 25.89 +/- 10.34 h, P > 0.05). The rates of abortion within 24 h and 48 h and the adverse effects were also comparable between the groups. Chills and fever were the most common adverse effects in this study. Conclusion: Intravaginal misoprostol either moistened with NSS or acetic acid was comparable in terms of efficacy and adverse effects.
引用
收藏
页码:882 / 886
页数:5
相关论文
共 12 条
[1]  
BDELMAEBOUD KH, 2008, J OBSTET GYNECOL RES, V34, P78
[2]   Knowledge of correct dosages of misoprostol in reproductive health [J].
Deole, Nishigandh ;
Weeks, Andrew .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2010, 109 (01) :71-72
[3]   A randomized trial of saline solution-moistened misoprostol versus dry misoprostol for first-trimester pregnancy failure [J].
Gilles, JM ;
Creinin, MD ;
Barnhart, K ;
Westhoff, C ;
Frederick, MM ;
Zhang, J .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2004, 190 (02) :389-394
[4]   Early pregnancy termination with intravaginally administered sodium chloride solution-moistened misoprostol tablets: Historical comparison with mifepristone and oral misoprostol [J].
Jain, JA ;
Meckstroth, KR ;
Mishell, DR .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1999, 181 (06) :1386-1391
[5]   EFFECTS OF FOOD AND ANTACID ON ORAL ABSORPTION OF MISOPROSTOL, A SYNTHETIC PROSTAGLANDIN-E1 ANALOG [J].
KARIM, A ;
ROZEK, LF ;
SMITH, ME ;
KOWALSKI, KG .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 1989, 29 (05) :439-443
[6]   Misoprostol wetting with acetic acid for pre-abortion cervical priming [J].
Kelekci, S ;
Yilmaz, B ;
Savan, K .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2004, 85 (02) :188-189
[7]   Intravaginal misoprostol for pregnancy termination [J].
Pongsatha, S ;
Tongsong, T .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2004, 87 (02) :176-177
[8]   Randomized comparison of dry tablet insertion versus gel form of vaginal misoprostol for second trimester pregnancy termination [J].
Pongsatha, Saipin ;
Tongsong, Theera .
JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY RESEARCH, 2008, 34 (02) :199-203
[9]   Does an acidic medium enhance the efficacy of vaginal misoprostol for pre-abortion cervical priming? [J].
Singh, K ;
Fong, YF ;
Prasad, RNV ;
Dong, F .
HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 1999, 14 (06) :1635-1637
[10]  
Wiebe ER, 2001, J REPROD MED, V46, P125