Predicting factors for survival of breast cancer patients using machine learning techniques

被引:131
作者
Ganggayah, Mogana Darshini [1 ]
Taib, Nur Aishah [2 ]
Har, Yip Cheng [2 ]
Lio, Pietro [3 ]
Dhillon, Sarinder Kaur [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Malaya, Inst Biol Sci, Fac Sci, Data Sci & Bioinformat Lab, Kuala Lumpur 50603, Malaysia
[2] Univ Malaya, Dept Surg, Fac Med, Kuala Lumpur 50603, Malaysia
[3] Univ Cambridge, Dept Comp Sci & Technol, 15 JJ Thomson Ave, Cambridge CB3 0FD, England
关键词
Data science; Machine learning; Factors influencing survival of breast cancer; Random forest; Decision tree; RANDOM FOREST; LOGISTIC-REGRESSION; NODE DISSECTION; TUMOR SIZE; TREE; CLASSIFICATION; DISEASE; MODEL; NUMBER; TRENDS;
D O I
10.1186/s12911-019-0801-4
中图分类号
R-058 [];
学科分类号
摘要
BackgroundBreast cancer is one of the most common diseases in women worldwide. Many studies have been conducted to predict the survival indicators, however most of these analyses were predominantly performed using basic statistical methods. As an alternative, this study used machine learning techniques to build models for detecting and visualising significant prognostic indicators of breast cancer survival rate.MethodsA large hospital-based breast cancer dataset retrieved from the University Malaya Medical Centre, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia (n=8066) with diagnosis information between 1993 and 2016 was used in this study. The dataset contained 23 predictor variables and one dependent variable, which referred to the survival status of the patients (alive or dead). In determining the significant prognostic factors of breast cancer survival rate, prediction models were built using decision tree, random forest, neural networks, extreme boost, logistic regression, and support vector machine. Next, the dataset was clustered based on the receptor status of breast cancer patients identified via immunohistochemistry to perform advanced modelling using random forest. Subsequently, the important variables were ranked via variable selection methods in random forest. Finally, decision trees were built and validation was performed using survival analysis.ResultsIn terms of both model accuracy and calibration measure, all algorithms produced close outcomes, with the lowest obtained from decision tree (accuracy=79.8%) and the highest from random forest (accuracy=82.7%). The important variables identified in this study were cancer stage classification, tumour size, number of total axillary lymph nodes removed, number of positive lymph nodes, types of primary treatment, and methods of diagnosis.ConclusionInterestingly the various machine learning algorithms used in this study yielded close accuracy hence these methods could be used as alternative predictive tools in the breast cancer survival studies, particularly in the Asian region. The important prognostic factors influencing survival rate of breast cancer identified in this study, which were validated by survival curves, are useful and could be translated into decision support tools in the medical domain.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 60 条
[1]   Artificial neural networks in medical diagnosis [J].
Amato, Filippo ;
Lopez, Alberto ;
Pena-Mendez, Eladia Maria ;
Vanhara, Petr ;
Hampl, Ales ;
Havel, Josef .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED BIOMEDICINE, 2013, 11 (02) :47-58
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2013, Int. J. Adv. Comput. Res.
[3]   TREATMENT OF EARLY BREAST-CANCER - REPORT AFTER 10 YEARS OF A CLINICAL TRIAL [J].
ATKINS, H ;
WAYTE, AB ;
HAYWARD, JL ;
KLUGMAN, DJ .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1972, 2 (5811) :423-&
[4]   Trends in presentation, management and survival of patients with de novo metastatic breast cancer in a Southeast Asian setting [J].
Bhoo-Pathy, Nirmala ;
Verkooijen, Helena Marieke ;
Tan, Ern-Yu ;
Miao, Hui ;
Taib, Nur Aishah Mohd ;
Brand, Judith S. ;
Dent, Rebecca A. ;
See, Mee-Hoong ;
Subramaniam, ShriDevi ;
Chan, Patrick ;
Lee, Soo-Chin ;
Hartman, Mikael ;
Yip, Cheng-Har .
SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2015, 5
[5]   Hybrid integration of Multilayer Perceptron Neural Networks and machine learning ensembles for landslide susceptibility assessment at Himalayan area (India) using GIS [J].
Binh Thai Pham ;
Dieu Tien Bui ;
Prakash, Indra ;
Dholakia, M. B. .
CATENA, 2017, 149 :52-63
[6]   Random forests [J].
Breiman, L .
MACHINE LEARNING, 2001, 45 (01) :5-32
[7]   Do Clinical Features and Survival of Single Hormone Receptor Positive Breast Cancers Differ from Double Hormone Receptor Positive Breast Cancers? [J].
Char-Hong Ng ;
Pathy, Nirmala Bhoo ;
Taib, Nur Aishah ;
Ho, Gwo-Fuang ;
Mun, Kein-Seong ;
Rhodes, Anthony ;
Looi, Lai-Meng ;
Yip, Cheng-Har .
ASIAN PACIFIC JOURNAL OF CANCER PREVENTION, 2014, 15 (18) :7959-7964
[8]  
Chen T., 2021, XGBOOST EXTREME GRAD
[9]   A comparative study of logistic model tree, random forest, and classification and regression tree models for spatial prediction of landslide susceptibility [J].
Chen, Wei ;
Xie, Xiaoshen ;
Wang, Jiale ;
Pradhan, Biswajeet ;
Hong, Haoyuan ;
Bui, Dieu Tien ;
Duan, Zhao ;
Ma, Jianquan .
CATENA, 2017, 151 :147-160
[10]   Predicting postoperative complications of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma in elderly patients using random forest algorithm model [J].
Chen, YiMing ;
Cao, Wei ;
Gao, XianChao ;
Ong, HuiShan ;
Ji, Tong .
BMC MEDICAL INFORMATICS AND DECISION MAKING, 2015, 15