Complications in extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy: a cohort study

被引:9
|
作者
Wagenius, Magnus [1 ,2 ]
Jakobsson, Jon [2 ]
Stranne, Johan [3 ]
Linder, Adam [1 ]
机构
[1] Lund Univ, Dept Clin Sci, Div Infect Med, Lund, Sweden
[2] Helsingborg Hosp, Dept Surg, SE-25187 Helsingborg, Sweden
[3] Sahlgrens Univ Hosp, Dept Urol, Gothenburg, Sweden
关键词
Complications; extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy; infection; monotherapy; ureteric stone; ureteroscopy; WAVE LITHOTRIPSY; STENT PLACEMENT; CALCULI; UROLITHIASIS; STEINSTRASSE; METAANALYSIS; PROPHYLAXIS; EXPERIENCE; INFECTION; STONE;
D O I
10.1080/21681805.2017.1347821
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate clinically relevant complications within 14 days after extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (ESWL) in a modern setting.Materials and methods: Consecutive ESWL treatments between 2009 and 2015 in Angelholm Hospital, Sweden, were analyzed retrospectively. The primary outcome was complications in patients seeking medical attention within 14 days after ESWL. Multivariable analysis was used to adjust for confounders such as diabetes, stone size and location, and presence of a urinary stent.Results: In total, 1838 stones were treated: 1185 (64.4%) localized in the renal pelvis, and 415 (22.5%) in the upper two-thirds and 205 (11.1%) in the lower third of the ureter. Overall, 116 out of 1838 cases (6.4%) needed medical attention within 14 days after ESWL and 75 (4%) crequired hospital care. Infection was found in 44 cases (2.4%), with a positive urine culture in 33 cases. Invasive/operative interventions were performed in 41 cases (2.2%). Distal stones had a lower risk of complications (p=0.02) with ESWL. Diabetes (p=0.02), larger stones (11-20mm, p=0.03; 21-30mm, p=0.009) and a need for antiemetics during treatment (p=0.02) were significantly associated with an increased risk of complications.Conclusions: Few complications are associated with modern ESWL treatment. A frequency of 1Hz should be used to reduce complications (p=0.025). Diabetes and larger stone size increase the risk of complications. The need for antiemetics during ESWL requires special consideration and further study. Distal stones seem to carry a lower risk of complications (p=0.017).
引用
收藏
页码:407 / 413
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] THE COMPLICATIONS OF EXTRACORPOREAL SHOCKWAVE LITHOTRIPSY - MANAGEMENT AND PREVENTION
    COPTCOAT, MJ
    WEBB, DR
    KELLETT, MJ
    FLETCHER, MS
    MCNICHOLAS, TA
    DICKINSON, IK
    WHITFIELD, HN
    WICKHAM, JEA
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1986, 58 (06): : 578 - 580
  • [2] EXTRACORPOREAL SHOCKWAVE LITHOTRIPSY
    DAS, G
    BIOMEDICINE & PHARMACOTHERAPY, 1988, 42 (05) : 361 - 362
  • [3] EXTRACORPOREAL SHOCKWAVE LITHOTRIPSY
    WEBB, DR
    ABBOTT, MA
    KELLETT, MJ
    JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY OF MEDICINE, 1985, 78 (12) : 1063 - 1064
  • [4] Extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy
    不详
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 1999, 13 (02) : 131 - 133
  • [5] AMBULATORY EXTRACORPOREAL SHOCKWAVE LITHOTRIPSY
    NISONSON, I
    WITUS, WS
    MADORSKY, ML
    WEEMS, WS
    UROLOGY, 1986, 28 (05) : 381 - 384
  • [6] The case for extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy
    Phipps, Simon
    Tolley, David A.
    ANNALS OF THE ROYAL COLLEGE OF SURGEONS OF ENGLAND, 2010, 92 (05) : 368 - 370
  • [7] Extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy in pediatrics
    D'Addessi, Alessandro
    Bongiovanni, Luca
    Sasso, Francesco
    Gulino, Gaetano
    Falabella, Roberto
    Bassi, Pierfrancesco
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2008, 22 (01) : 1 - 11
  • [8] MOBILE EXTRACORPOREAL SHOCKWAVE LITHOTRIPSY
    RAJAGOPAL, V
    BAILEY, MJ
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1991, 67 (01): : 6 - 8
  • [9] BILIARY EXTRACORPOREAL SHOCKWAVE LITHOTRIPSY
    RAWAT, B
    BURHENNE, HJ
    CARDIOVASCULAR AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY, 1990, 13 (04) : 258 - 263
  • [10] EXTRACORPOREAL SHOCKWAVE LITHOTRIPSY AND THE RISK OF DIABETES MELLITUS: A POPULATION-BASED COHORT STUDY
    Ordon, Michael
    Welk, Blayne
    Lee, Jason
    Honey, R. D'A John
    Pace, Kenneth
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2016, 195 (04): : E728 - E728