Welfare environmentality and REDD plus incentives in Indonesia

被引:0
作者
Boer, Henry [1 ]
机构
[1] Griffith Univ, Sch Govt & Int Relat, Griffith Business Sch, 70 Kessels Rd, Nathan, Qld 4881, Australia
关键词
Welfare environmentality; REDD plus incentives; payment and benefit distribution; FOREST; GOVERNMENTALITY; DEFORESTATION; KALIMANTAN; GOVERNANCE; BENEFITS; PAYMENTS; POLICIES; CARBON; MARKET;
D O I
10.1080/1523908X.2017.1292872
中图分类号
F0 [经济学]; F1 [世界各国经济概况、经济史、经济地理]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
0201 ; 020105 ; 03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
This paper applies the concept of welfare environmentality to analyse Indonesia's emerging national and project-based incentive frameworks, a key component to the climate programme reducing emissions from deforestation and forest degradation (REDD+). The paper adapts governmentality theory to explore the rationale and design of various incentive instruments, including government institutions to disburse financial payments and co-benefits to multiple recipients, as well as a local demonstration project in Central Kalimantan Province. These REDD+ incentives are often conflated with the neoliberalisation of the climate agenda, focused on the adoption of market instruments and the commodification of forest carbon. However, REDD+ incentives in Indonesia include diverse policy mechanisms and encompass multiple objectives - such as the delivery of social services and employment schemes aimed at improving community livelihoods. These incentives employ a welfare environmentality, where government agencies and their partners deliver certain rights and socio-economic security for communities in return for adopting practices that improve carbon and forest management. The application of welfare environmentality shows how incentive frameworks operate as a state intervention designed to restructure relations between people and environmental resources.
引用
收藏
页码:795 / 809
页数:15
相关论文
共 54 条
  • [2] Angelsen A., 2012, Analyzing REDD+: Challenges and Choices, P1
  • [3] Designing and Implementing Effective REDD plus Policies: A Forest Transition Approach
    Angelsen, Arild
    Rudel, Thomas K.
    [J]. REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND POLICY, 2013, 7 (01) : 91 - 113
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2014, REDD GROUND
  • [5] Ardiansyah F., 2015, 132 CIFOR
  • [6] Barr N., 1998, EC WELFARE STATE, V3rd
  • [7] Governance and governmentality after neoliberalism
    Bevir, Mark
    [J]. POLICY AND POLITICS, 2011, 39 (04): : 457 - 471
  • [8] Burchell Graham., 1996, FOUCAULT POLITICAL R
  • [9] Buscher B., 2012, CAPITALISM NATURE SO, V23, P4, DOI DOI 10.1080/10455752.2012.674149
  • [10] Social safeguards and co-benefits in REDD+: a review of the adjacent possible
    Chhatre, Ashwini
    Lakhanpal, Shikha
    Larson, Anne M.
    Nelson, Fred
    Ojha, Hemant
    Rao, Jagdeesh
    [J]. CURRENT OPINION IN ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY, 2012, 4 (06) : 654 - 660