Meta-analysis for the evaluation of perioperative enhanced recovery after gynaecological surgery

被引:0
作者
Wu, Xiaofang [1 ]
Liu, Lingling [1 ]
Zhou, Fang [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Elect Sci & Technol China, Mianyang Cent Hosp, Sch Med, Mianyang 621000, Peoples R China
关键词
ERAS; gynaecological surgery; systematic review; meta-analysis; effect evaluation; ERAS(R) SOCIETY RECOMMENDATIONS; GUIDELINES; CARE; PRE;
D O I
10.5603/GPa.2022.0064
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objectives: To systematically evaluate the effectiveness and safety of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) in gynaecological surgery and provide a scientific basis for its clinical promotion and application in the Chinese population. Material and methods: Systematic retrieval from CNKI, Wanfang, VIP database and other Chinese literature databases. Studies on ERAS application with a randomised controlled trial in gynaecological surgery were included in the present report. Outcome indicators: hospitalisation time, postoperative ambulation time, postoperative feeding time, postoperative exhaust time, postoperative defecation time, operation time, postoperative blood loss, postoperative morbidity, patient satisfaction, hospitalisation expenses, etc. The meta-analysis was performed using the Revman 5.3 software. Results: A total of 24 studies were included in the analysis. The results showed that, compared with the traditional group, the ERAS group had a lower hospitalisation time (SMD = -1.67, 95% CI = -2.03 similar to -1.30, p < 0.0001), postoperative ambulation time (SMD = -4.16, 95% CI = -5.12 similar to -3.20, p < 0.0001), postoperative feeding time (SMD = -7.36, 95% CI = -9.67 similar to -5.05, p < 0.0001), postoperative exhaust time (SMD = -2.59, 95% CI = -3.15 similar to -2.03, p < 0.0001), postoperative defecation time (SMD = -2.23, 95% CI = -2.88 similar to -1.57, p < 0.0001), postoperative morbidity (OR = 0.22, 95% CI = 0.15 similar to 0.31, p < 0.0001) and hospitalisation expenses (SMD = -0.53, 95% CI = -0.78 similar to -0.28, p < 0.0001). The patient satisfaction was significantly improved (odds ratio = 8.11, 95% CI = 4.96 similar to 13.24, p < 0.0001), and there were no significant differences in intraoperative blood loss and operation time between the two groups. Conclusions: The application of the ERAS protocol in gynaecological surgery significantly improves the effectiveness and safety of the procedure. Thus, it can be promoted and applied in clinical practice in China.
引用
收藏
页码:896 / 903
页数:8
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]  
Cai B, 2020, PSY, V15, P15
[2]  
Chen DL, 2020, WOMENS HLTH RES, P107
[3]  
Cheng CX, 2017, LAPAROSC SURG, V9, P700
[4]  
Chu BL, 2020, MODERN CHINESE DOCTO, V58, P69
[5]   Enhanced recovery pathways in abdominal gynecologic surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis [J].
de Groot, Jeanny J. A. ;
Ament, Stephanie M. C. ;
Maessen, Jose M. C. ;
Dejong, Cornelis H. C. ;
Kleijnen, Jos M. P. ;
Slangen, Brigitte F. M. .
ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2016, 95 (04) :382-395
[6]  
Fan YH, 2019, WORLD LATEST MED INF, V19, P378
[7]  
Fang LL, 2021, J MED THEORY PRACTIC, V34, P694
[8]  
Gong GF, 2019, GUANGDONG MED J, V40, P256
[9]  
郭晓青, 2021, [实用妇产科杂志, Journal of Practical Obstetrics and Gynecology], V37, P81
[10]   The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials [J].
Higgins, Julian P. T. ;
Altman, Douglas G. ;
Gotzsche, Peter C. ;
Jueni, Peter ;
Moher, David ;
Oxman, Andrew D. ;
Savovic, Jelena ;
Schulz, Kenneth F. ;
Weeks, Laura ;
Sterne, Jonathan A. C. .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2011, 343