Assessing the predictive value of the rodent neurofunctional assessment for commonly reported adverse events in phase I clinical trials

被引:43
|
作者
Mead, Andy N. [1 ,10 ]
Amouzadeh, Hamid R. [2 ]
Chapman, Kathryn [3 ]
Ewart, Lorna [4 ]
Giarola, Alessandra [5 ]
Jackson, Samuel J. [3 ]
Jarvis, Philip [6 ]
Jordaan, Pierre [6 ]
Redfern, Will [7 ]
Traebert, Martin [8 ]
Valentin, Jean-Pierre [9 ,11 ]
Vargas, Hugo M. [2 ]
机构
[1] Pfizer Inc, Eastern Point Rd, Groton, CT 06340 USA
[2] Amgen Inc, Global Patient Safety & Labeling, Newbury Pk, CA 91320 USA
[3] Natl Ctr Replacement Refinement & Reduct Anim Res, Gibbs Bldg,215 Euston Rd, London NW1 2BE, England
[4] AstraZeneca R&D, da Vinci Bldg,Melbourn Sci Pk,Cambridge Rd, Royston SG8 6HB, Herts, England
[5] GlaxoSmithKline, Dept Safety Assessment, Pk Rd, Ware, Herts, England
[6] Novartis DS&E & Oncol OGD, CH-4002 Basel, Switzerland
[7] AstraZeneca R&D, Drug Safety & Metab, Cambridge CB22 3AT, England
[8] Novartis Inst Biomed Res, Safety Pharmacol, CH-4057 Basel, Switzerland
[9] AstraZeneca R&D, Drug Safety & Metab, Alderley Pk, Macclesfield SK10 4TG, Cheshire, England
[10] AstraZeneca, Drug Safety & Metab Innovat Medicines & Early Dev, Cambridge Sci Pk,Milton Rd, Cambridge CB4 0WG, England
[11] UCB Biopharma, Nonclin Dev, Chemin Foriest, B-1420 Braine Lalleud, Belgium
关键词
Adverse events; Central nervous system; First-in-human; Functional observational battery; Methods; Neurobehavioural assessment; Predictive value; Translation; SAFETY PHARMACOLOGY; ANIMAL-MODELS; RATS; NAUSEA; OPPORTUNITIES; CONCORDANCE; DRUGS;
D O I
10.1016/j.yrtph.2016.05.002
中图分类号
DF [法律]; D9 [法律]; R [医药、卫生];
学科分类号
0301 ; 10 ;
摘要
Central Nervous System (CNS)-related safety concerns are major contributors to delays and failure during the development of new candidate drugs (CDs), CNS-related safety data on 141 small molecule CDs from five pharmaceutical companies were analyzed to identify the concordance between rodent multi parameter neurofunctional assessments (Functional Observational Battery: FOB, or Irwin test: IT) and the five most common adverse events (AEs) in Phase I clinical trials, namely headache, nausea, dizziness, fatigue/somnolence and pain. In the context of this analysis, the FOB/IT did not predict the occurrence of these particular AEs in man. For AEs such as headache, nausea, dizziness and pain the results are perhaps unsurprising, as the FOB/IT were not originally designed to predict these AEs. More unexpected was that the FOB/IT are not adequate for predicting 'somnolence/fatigue' nonclinically. In drug development, these five most prevalent AEs are rarely responsible for delaying or stopping further progression of CDs. More serious AEs that might stop CD development occurred at too low an incidence rate in our clinical dataset to enable translational analysis. (C) 2016 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:348 / 357
页数:10
相关论文
共 23 条
  • [1] DEALING WITH ADVERSE EVENTS IN PHASE-I TRIALS
    HEGERMAHN, D
    MAHLER, M
    HERMANN, R
    NOWAK, H
    WEBER, W
    SEIBERTGRAFE, M
    ARZNEIMITTEL-FORSCHUNG/DRUG RESEARCH, 1995, 45-1 (03): : 331 - 336
  • [2] Adverse Events Reported in Trials Assessing Manual Therapy to the Extremities: A Systematic Review
    Ferguson, Jeffrey
    Fritsch, Adam
    Rhon, Daniel I.
    Young, Jodi L.
    JOURNAL OF INTEGRATIVE AND COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE, 2024, 30 (06): : 507 - 517
  • [3] Concise Review: A Safety Assessment of Adipose-Derived Cell Therapy in Clinical Trials: A Systematic Review of Reported Adverse Events
    Toyserkani, Navid Mohamadpour
    Jorgensen, Mads Gustaf
    Tabatabaeifar, Siavosh
    Jensen, Charlotte Harken
    Sheikh, Soren Paludan
    Sorensen, Jens Ahm
    STEM CELLS TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE, 2017, 6 (09) : 1786 - 1794
  • [4] Assessment of serious adverse events in academic clinical trials: concordance between investigator and sponsor
    Bezin, J.
    Miremont-Salame, G.
    Moore, N.
    Haramburu, F.
    Gimbert, A.
    FUNDAMENTAL & CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 2013, 27 : 93 - 93
  • [5] Quantitative assessment of adverse events in clinical trials: Comparison of methods at an interim and the final analysis
    Hollaender, Norbert
    Conzalez-Maffe, Juan
    Jehl, Valentine
    BIOMETRICAL JOURNAL, 2020, 62 (03) : 658 - 669
  • [6] Monitoring Phase II Comparative Clinical Trials with Two Endpoints and Penalty for Adverse Events
    Sotiris Bersimis
    Athanasios Sachlas
    Takis Papaioannou
    Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability, 2018, 20 : 719 - 738
  • [7] Monitoring Phase II Comparative Clinical Trials with Two Endpoints and Penalty for Adverse Events
    Bersimis, Sotiris
    Sachlas, Athanasios
    Papaioannou, Takis
    METHODOLOGY AND COMPUTING IN APPLIED PROBABILITY, 2018, 20 (02) : 719 - 738
  • [8] Online monitoring of patient self-reported adverse events in early phase clinical trials: Views from patients, clinicians, and trial staff
    Kennedy, Fiona
    Shearsmith, Leanne
    Ayres, Michael
    Lindner, Oana C.
    Marston, Lewis
    Pass, Alison
    Danson, Sarah
    Velikova, Galina
    CLINICAL TRIALS, 2021, 18 (02) : 168 - 179
  • [9] Patient based method of assessing adverse events in clinical trials in rheumatology: the revised Stanford Toxicity Index
    Welch, V
    Singh, G
    Strand, V
    Fries, J
    Boers, M
    Ramey, D
    Day, RO
    Brooks, P
    Tugwell, P
    Clinch, J
    Kristjansson, B
    JOURNAL OF RHEUMATOLOGY, 2001, 28 (05) : 1188 - 1191
  • [10] Who volunteers for phase I clinical trials? Influences of anxiety, social anxiety and depressive symptoms on self-selection and the reporting of adverse events
    Luis Almeida
    Todd B. Kashdan
    Teresa Nunes
    Rui Coelho
    António Albino-Teixeira
    Patrício Soares-da-Silva
    European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 2008, 64 : 575 - 582