Efficacy Outcome Measures for Pediatric Procedural Sedation Clinical Trials: An ACTTION Systematic Review

被引:14
|
作者
Williams, Mark R. [1 ]
Nayshtut, Michael [2 ]
Hoefnagel, Amie [3 ]
McKeown, Andrew [1 ]
Carlson, Douglas W. [4 ]
Cravero, Joseph [5 ]
Lightdale, Jenifer [6 ]
Mason, Keira P. [5 ]
Wilson, Stephen [7 ]
Turk, Dennis C. [8 ]
Dworkin, Robert H. [1 ,9 ,10 ]
Ward, Denham S. [1 ,11 ]
机构
[1] Univ Rochester, Sch Med & Dent, Dept Anesthesiol, 601 Elmwood Ave,Box 604, Rochester, NY 14642 USA
[2] Robert Wood Johnson St Barnabas Hlth Syst, Dept Anesthesiol, Livingston, NJ USA
[3] Univ Florida, Dept Anesthesiol, Jacksonville, FL USA
[4] Washington Univ, St Louis Childrens Hosp, Div Pediat Hosp Med, St Louis, MO 63110 USA
[5] Boston Childrens Hosp, Dept Anesthesiol Perioperat & Pain Med, Boston, MA USA
[6] Univ Massachusetts, Sch Med, Dept Pediat, UMass Mem Childrens Med Ctr, Worcester, MA USA
[7] Cincinnati Childrens Hosp Med Ctr, Div Pediat Dent, Cincinnati, OH 45229 USA
[8] Univ Washington, Dept Anesthesiol & Pain Med, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[9] Univ Rochester, Sch Med & Dent, Dept Neurol, Rochester, NY 14642 USA
[10] Univ Rochester, Sch Med & Dent, Dept Psychiat, Rochester, NY 14642 USA
[11] Tufts Sch Med, Dept Anesthesiol, Boston, MA USA
关键词
OF-MICHIGAN SEDATION; EMERGENCY-DEPARTMENT; PRESCHOOL-CHILDREN; INTRANASAL MIDAZOLAM; PATIENT SATISFACTION; OBJECTIVE MEASURES; PAIN MEASUREMENT; ANESTHESIA CARE; ADVERSE EVENTS; RECOVERY SCALE;
D O I
10.1213/ANE.0000000000002456
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Objective evaluations comparing different techniques and approaches to pediatric procedural sedation studies have been limited by a lack of consistency among the outcome measures used in assessment. This study reviewed those existing measures, which have undergone psychometric analysis in a pediatric procedural sedation setting, to determine to what extent and in what circumstances their use is justified across the spectrum of procedures, age groups, and techniques. The results of our study suggest that a wide range of measures has been used to assess the efficacy and effectiveness of pediatric procedural sedation. Most lack the evidence of validity and reliability that is necessary to facilitate rigorous clinical trial design, as well as the evaluation of new drugs and devices. A set of core pediatric sedation outcome domains and outcome measures can be developed on the basis of our findings. We believe that consensus among all stakeholders regarding appropriate domains and measures to evaluate pediatric procedural sedation is possible and that widespread implementation of such recommendations should be pursued.
引用
收藏
页码:956 / 967
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Efficacy Outcome Measures for Procedural Sedation Clinical Trials in Adults: An ACTTION Systematic Review
    Williams, Mark R.
    McKeown, Andrew
    Dexter, Franklin
    Miner, James R.
    Sessler, Daniel I.
    Vargo, John
    Turk, Dennis C.
    Dworkin, Robert H.
    ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2016, 122 (01) : 152 - 170
  • [2] Adverse event reporting in nonpharmacologic, noninterventional pain clinical trials: ACTTION systematic review
    Hunsinger, Matthew
    Smith, Shannon M.
    Rothstein, Daniel
    McKeown, Andrew
    Parkhurst, Melissa
    Hertz, Sharon
    Katz, Nathaniel P.
    Lin, Allison H.
    McDermott, Michael P.
    Rappaport, Bob A.
    Turk, Dennis C.
    Dworkin, Robert H.
    PAIN, 2014, 155 (11) : 2253 - 2262
  • [3] Evaluating the safety of procedural sedation in emergency department settings among the pediatric population: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Khan, Muhammad Taha
    Ishaq, Ammar
    Rohail, Samia
    Sulaiman, Samia Aziz
    Raza, Fatima Ali
    Habib, Haris
    Goyal, Aman
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2025, 27 (03) : 178 - 190
  • [4] Safety and Efficacy of the Combination of Propofol and Ketamine for Procedural Sedation/Anesthesia in the Pediatric Population: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Hayes, Jason A.
    Aljuhani, Talal
    De Oliveira, Kyle
    Johnston, Bradley C.
    ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2021, 132 (04) : 979 - 992
  • [5] Classification and definition of misuse, abuse, and related events in clinical trials: ACTTION systematic review and recommendations
    Smith, Shannon M.
    Dart, Richard C.
    Katz, Nathaniel P.
    Paillard, Florence
    Adams, Edgar H.
    Comer, Sandra D.
    Degroot, Aldemar
    Edwards, Robert R.
    Haddox, J. David
    Jaffe, Jerome H.
    Jones, Christopher M.
    Kleber, Herbert D.
    Kopecky, Ernest A.
    Markman, John D.
    Montoya, Ivan D.
    O'Brien, Charles
    Roland, Carl L.
    Stanton, Marsha
    Strain, Eric C.
    Vorsanger, Gary
    Wasan, Ajay D.
    Weiss, Roger D.
    Turk, Dennis C.
    Dworkin, Robert H.
    PAIN, 2013, 154 (11) : 2287 - 2296
  • [6] Pulmonary aspiration during procedural sedation: a comprehensive systematic review
    Green, S. M.
    Mason, K. P.
    Krauss, B. S.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2017, 118 (03) : 344 - 354
  • [7] Intravenous vs intramuscular ketamine for pediatric procedural sedation by emergency medicine specialists: a review
    Deasy, Conor
    Babl, Franz E.
    PEDIATRIC ANESTHESIA, 2010, 20 (09) : 787 - 796
  • [8] Safety and Efficacy of Procedural Sedation and Analgesia in Pediatric Oncology Patients
    Aslam, Saba Laila
    Haque, Anwar
    Jamil, Muhammad Tariq
    Ariff, Madiha
    Nasir, Saad
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2020, 12 (03)
  • [9] Assessing procedural satisfaction in the pediatric ED: A systematic review
    Crumm, Caitlin E.
    Kaushal, Sonia
    Chumpitazi, Corrie E.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2021, 43 : 283 - 286
  • [10] Adverse event assessment, analysis, and reporting in recent published analgesic clinical trials: ACTTION systematic review and recommendations
    Smith, Shannon M.
    Wang, Anthony T.
    Katz, Nathaniel P.
    McDermott, Michael P.
    Burke, Laurie B.
    Coplan, Paul
    Gilron, Ian
    Hertz, Sharon H.
    Lin, Allison H.
    Rappaport, Bob A.
    Rowbotham, Michael C.
    Sampaio, Cristina
    Sweeney, Michael
    Turk, Dennis C.
    Dworkin, Robert H.
    PAIN, 2013, 154 (07) : 997 - 1008