What Makes a Good Citizen Online? The Emergence of Discursive Citizensh Norms in Social Media Environments

被引:17
作者
Gagrcin, Emilija [1 ]
Porten-Chee, Pablo [1 ,2 ]
Leissner, Laura [1 ]
Emmer, Martin [1 ]
Jorring, Louise [3 ]
机构
[1] Free Univ Berlin, Weizenbaum Inst Networked Soc, Berlin, Germany
[2] Heidelberg Univ, Commun Studies & Informat Soc Ibero Amer, Heidelberg, Germany
[3] Copenhagen Business Sch, Frederiksberg, Denmark
来源
SOCIAL MEDIA + SOCIETY | 2022年 / 8卷 / 01期
关键词
good citizenship; discursive citizenship norms; political participation; political expression; social media; POLITICAL-PARTICIPATION; YOUTH; COMMUNICATION; TWITTER; MODELS; TWEET; DUTY;
D O I
10.1177/20563051221084297
中图分类号
G2 [信息与知识传播];
学科分类号
05 ; 0503 ;
摘要
The importance of citizenship norms-shared understandings of how citizens ought to participate in society-has been discussed at length in the past two decades, particularly in conversations around changing notions of citizenship in the digital age. Yet, most studies have gravitated between the two poles of dutiful and self-actualizing citizenship. In this study, we explore which citizenship norms people express related to their political participation in social media environments and which affordances and experiences in social media environments shape these norms. Through interviews and focus group discussions, we found that citizenship norms emerge in response to positive and negative experiences in social media environments. We found three groups of norms that are distinctive to the networked environments of social media: individual information care, discourse care, and considered contribution. These can serve as conceptual frames for understanding the normative underpinnings of discursive participation in social media environments from the perspective of ordinary citizens.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 71 条
  • [1] Amna E., 2013, EWC STATEMENT SERIES, P17
  • [2] Standby citizens: diverse faces of political passivity
    Amna, Erik
    Ekman, Joakim
    [J]. EUROPEAN POLITICAL SCIENCE REVIEW, 2014, 6 (02) : 261 - 281
  • [3] Andersen K., 2021, GENERATIONAL GAPS PO, DOI [10.4324/9781003111498, DOI 10.4324/9781003111498]
  • [4] Bandura A., 1995, SELF EFFICACY CHANGI, DOI [10.1017/CBO9780511527692, DOI 10.1017/CBO9780511527692]
  • [5] Socially Mediated Publicness: An Introduction
    Baym, Nancy K.
    Boyd, Danah
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BROADCASTING & ELECTRONIC MEDIA, 2012, 56 (03) : 320 - 329
  • [6] Bennett W.L., 2008, CIVIC LIFE ONLINE LE, DOI [10.1162/dmal.9780262524827.001, 10.1162/dmal.9780262524827.001 10.1162/dmal.9780262524827.001, DOI 10.1162/DMAL.9780262524827.001]
  • [7] THE LOGIC OF CONNECTIVE ACTION Digital media and the personalization of contentious politics
    Bennett, W. Lance
    Segerberg, Alexandra
    [J]. INFORMATION COMMUNICATION & SOCIETY, 2012, 15 (05) : 739 - 768
  • [8] Communicating Civic Engagement: Contrasting Models of Citizenship in the Youth Web Sphere
    Bennett, W. Lance
    Wells, Chris
    Freelon, Deen
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COMMUNICATION, 2011, 61 (05) : 835 - U96
  • [9] Bicchieri Cristina., 2017, NORMS WILD DIAGNOSE
  • [10] A New Space for Political Behavior: Political Social Networking and its Democratic Consequences
    Bode, Leticia
    Vraga, Emily K.
    Borah, Porismita
    Shah, Dhavan V.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COMPUTER-MEDIATED COMMUNICATION, 2014, 19 (03): : 414 - 429