Integrating life cycle assessment and a farmer survey of management practices to study environmental impacts of peach production in Beijing, China

被引:2
|
作者
Li, Ziyue [1 ]
Chen, Yongliang [1 ]
Meng, Fanlei [1 ]
Shao, Qi [1 ]
Heal, Mathew R. [2 ]
Ren, Fengling [1 ]
Tang, Aohan [1 ]
Wu, Jiechen [3 ]
Liu, Xuejun [1 ]
Cui, Zhenling [1 ]
Xu, Wen [1 ]
机构
[1] China Agr Univ, Coll Resources & Environm Sci, Natl Acad Agr Green Dev, Key Lab Plant Soil Interact,Minist Educ,Natl Obse, Beijing 100193, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Edinburgh, Sch Chem, Joseph Black Bldg,David Brewster Rd, Edinburgh EH9 3FJ, Midlothian, Scotland
[3] KTH Royal Inst Technol, Dept Sustainable Dev Environm Sci & Engn SEED, SE-10044 Stockholm, Sweden
基金
中国国家自然科学基金; 国家重点研发计划;
关键词
Peach production; Life cycle assessment; Environmental emission mitigation; Nutrient management; Farming practice; Peri-urban agriculture; FRUIT-QUALITY; MAIZE PRODUCTION; FERTILIZER USE; CROP LOAD; YIELD; SYSTEMS; APPLE; IRRIGATION; EFFICIENCY; POLLUTION;
D O I
10.1007/s11356-022-19780-0
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
While intensive peach production has expanded rapidly in recent years, few studies have explored the environmental impacts associated with specific regional systems or the optimal management strategies to minimize associated environmental risks. Here, data from a survey of 290 native farmers were used to conduct a life cycle assessment to quantify the acidification potential (AP), global warming potential (GWP), eutrophication potential (EP), and reactive nitrogen (Nr) losses in peach production in Pinggu District, Beijing. Total annual Nr losses, and GWP, AP, and EP values for peach production in Pinggu District were respectively 10.7 kg N t(-1), 857 kg CO2-eq t(-1), 12.9 kg SO2-eq t(-1), and 4.1 kg PO4-eq t(-1). The principal driving factors were fertilizer production, transportation, and application, which together accounted for 94%, 67%, 75%, and 94% of Nr losses, GWP, AP, and EP, respectively. In the high yield, high nitrogen-use efficiency (HH) group, relative values of Nr losses, GWP, AP, and EP were respectively 33%, 25%, 39%, and 32% lower than the overall averages for 290 orchards. Further analyses indicate that improved farming practices such as decreasing application rates of fertilizers, increasing proportion of base fertilization rate, and proper fertilization frequency in the HH group were the main reasons for these orchards' better performance in peach yields and partial factor productivity of nitrogen fertilizer, and their reduced environmental impacts. These results highlight the need to optimize nutrient management in peach production in order simultaneously to realize both environmental sustainability and high productivity in the peach production system.
引用
收藏
页码:57190 / 57203
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Environmental impacts of wheat-based vodka production using life cycle assessment
    Bhattacharyya, Nirvan
    Goodell, Amy
    Rogers, Sarah
    Demond, Avery
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2019, 231 : 642 - 648
  • [42] Global environmental impacts of silver nanoparticle production methods supported by life cycle assessment
    Temizel-Sekeryan S.
    Hicks A.L.
    Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 2020, 156
  • [43] Global environmental impacts of silver nanoparticle production methods supported by life cycle assessment
    Temizel-Sekeryan, Sila
    Hicks, Andrea L.
    RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING, 2020, 156
  • [44] The Life-cycle Assessment and Environmental Impacts of Electricity Production in Porto Santo Island
    Torabi, Roham
    Rizzoli, Nicolo
    Arosio, Valeria
    Morgado-Dias, F.
    2017 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE IN ENERGY AND SUSTAINABILITY IN SMALL DEVELOPING ECONOMIES (ES2DE), 2017,
  • [45] Considering the influence of the variability in management practices on the environmental impacts of fruit production: A case study on raspberry production in Chile
    Vasquez-Ibarra, Leonardo
    Iriarte, Alfredo
    Rebolledo-Leiva, Ricardo
    Vasquez, Marcia
    Angulo-Meza, Lidia
    Gonzalez-Araya, Marcela C.
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2021, 313
  • [46] The effects of energy consumption of alumina production in the environmental impacts using life cycle assessment
    Javier Sáez-Guinoa
    Enrique García-Franco
    Eva Llera-Sastresa
    Luis M. Romeo
    The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2024, 29 : 380 - 393
  • [47] Assessing environmental impacts of a textile company using life cycle assessment approach—a case study
    Dani H.
    Shabiimam M.A.
    Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2025, 32 (12) : 7335 - 7343
  • [48] Environmental performance evolution of municipal solid waste management by life cycle assessment in Hangzhou, China
    Zhou, Zhaozhi
    Tang, Yuanjun
    Dong, Jun
    Chi, Yong
    Ni, Mingjiang
    Li, Nan
    Zhang, Yongfang
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2018, 227 : 23 - 33
  • [49] Life cycle carbon emission intensity assessment for photovoltaic greenhouses: A case study of Beijing City, China
    Wang, Longze
    Mao, Yuteng
    Li, Zhehan
    Yi, Xinxing
    Ma, Yiyi
    Zhang, Yan
    Li, Meicheng
    RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2024, 230
  • [50] Comparative life cycle assessment of sludge management: A case study of Xiamen, China
    Xiao Lishan
    Lin Tao
    Wang Yin
    Ye Zhilong
    Liao Jiangfu
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2018, 192 : 354 - 363