Integrating life cycle assessment and a farmer survey of management practices to study environmental impacts of peach production in Beijing, China

被引:2
|
作者
Li, Ziyue [1 ]
Chen, Yongliang [1 ]
Meng, Fanlei [1 ]
Shao, Qi [1 ]
Heal, Mathew R. [2 ]
Ren, Fengling [1 ]
Tang, Aohan [1 ]
Wu, Jiechen [3 ]
Liu, Xuejun [1 ]
Cui, Zhenling [1 ]
Xu, Wen [1 ]
机构
[1] China Agr Univ, Coll Resources & Environm Sci, Natl Acad Agr Green Dev, Key Lab Plant Soil Interact,Minist Educ,Natl Obse, Beijing 100193, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Edinburgh, Sch Chem, Joseph Black Bldg,David Brewster Rd, Edinburgh EH9 3FJ, Midlothian, Scotland
[3] KTH Royal Inst Technol, Dept Sustainable Dev Environm Sci & Engn SEED, SE-10044 Stockholm, Sweden
基金
中国国家自然科学基金; 国家重点研发计划;
关键词
Peach production; Life cycle assessment; Environmental emission mitigation; Nutrient management; Farming practice; Peri-urban agriculture; FRUIT-QUALITY; MAIZE PRODUCTION; FERTILIZER USE; CROP LOAD; YIELD; SYSTEMS; APPLE; IRRIGATION; EFFICIENCY; POLLUTION;
D O I
10.1007/s11356-022-19780-0
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
While intensive peach production has expanded rapidly in recent years, few studies have explored the environmental impacts associated with specific regional systems or the optimal management strategies to minimize associated environmental risks. Here, data from a survey of 290 native farmers were used to conduct a life cycle assessment to quantify the acidification potential (AP), global warming potential (GWP), eutrophication potential (EP), and reactive nitrogen (Nr) losses in peach production in Pinggu District, Beijing. Total annual Nr losses, and GWP, AP, and EP values for peach production in Pinggu District were respectively 10.7 kg N t(-1), 857 kg CO2-eq t(-1), 12.9 kg SO2-eq t(-1), and 4.1 kg PO4-eq t(-1). The principal driving factors were fertilizer production, transportation, and application, which together accounted for 94%, 67%, 75%, and 94% of Nr losses, GWP, AP, and EP, respectively. In the high yield, high nitrogen-use efficiency (HH) group, relative values of Nr losses, GWP, AP, and EP were respectively 33%, 25%, 39%, and 32% lower than the overall averages for 290 orchards. Further analyses indicate that improved farming practices such as decreasing application rates of fertilizers, increasing proportion of base fertilization rate, and proper fertilization frequency in the HH group were the main reasons for these orchards' better performance in peach yields and partial factor productivity of nitrogen fertilizer, and their reduced environmental impacts. These results highlight the need to optimize nutrient management in peach production in order simultaneously to realize both environmental sustainability and high productivity in the peach production system.
引用
收藏
页码:57190 / 57203
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Environmental Impacts Associated with the Production and Packing of Persian Lemon in Mexico through Life-Cycle Assessment
    Castillo-Gonzalez, Eduardo
    De Medina-Salas, Lorena
    Giraldi-Diaz, Mario Rafael
    Velasquez-De La Cruz, Raul
    Jimenez-Ochoa, Jose Rafael
    CLEAN TECHNOLOGIES, 2024, 6 (02): : 551 - 571
  • [32] Combined life cycle assessment and artificial intelligence for prediction of output energy and environmental impacts of sugarcane production
    Kaab, Ali
    Sharifi, Mohammad
    Mobli, Hossein
    Nabavi-Pelesaraei, Ashkan
    Chau, Kwok-wing
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2019, 664 : 1005 - 1019
  • [33] Life Cycle Environmental Impact Assessment of Sulfur-Based Compound Fertilizers: A Case Study in China
    Liu, Mengyue
    Li, Yue
    Yuan, Xueliang
    Xu, Yue
    Qiao, Liang
    Wang, Qingsong
    Ma, Qiao
    ACS SUSTAINABLE CHEMISTRY & ENGINEERING, 2022, 10 (07) : 2308 - 2317
  • [34] Life cycle assessment of tungsten carbide powder production: A case study in China
    Ma, Xiaotian
    Qi, Congcong
    Ye, Liping
    Yang, Donglu
    Hong, Jinglan
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2017, 149 : 936 - 944
  • [35] Integrating life cycle assessment (LCA) with boundary line analysis (BLA) to reduce agro-environmental risk of crop production: a case study of soybean production in Northern Iran
    Mohammadi-Kashka, Faezeh
    Pirdashti, Hemmatollah
    Tahmasebi-Sarvestani, Zeinolabedin
    Motevali, Ali
    Nadi, Mehdi
    Aghaeipour, Niloofar
    CLEAN TECHNOLOGIES AND ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY, 2023, 25 (08) : 2583 - 2602
  • [36] Life cycle assessment of potential pollutant-induced human capital loss caused by different agricultural production systems in Beijing, China
    Wang, Yichao
    Zhao, Guishen
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2019, 240
  • [37] Environmental impacts management of grain and sweet maize through life cycle assessment in Sao Paulo, Brazil
    Giusti, G.
    de Almeida, G. F.
    de Apresentacao, M. J. de F.
    Galvao, L. S.
    Knudsen, M. T.
    Djomo, S. N.
    Silva, D. A. L.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2023, 20 (06) : 6559 - 6574
  • [38] Life cycle assessment of copper production: a case study in China
    Jinglan Hong
    Yilu Chen
    Juan Liu
    Xiaotian Ma
    Congcong Qi
    Liping Ye
    The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2018, 23 : 1814 - 1824
  • [39] Life cycle assessment of copper production: a case study in China
    Hong, Jinglan
    Chen, Yilu
    Liu, Juan
    Ma, Xiaotian
    Qi, Congcong
    Ye, Liping
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2018, 23 (09) : 1814 - 1824
  • [40] Reducing the environmental impacts of vitreous optical fiber production - A Life Cycle Impact Assessment
    Pinto, Julian T. M.
    Amaral, Karen J.
    Hartard, Susanne
    Janissek, Paulo R.
    Helling, Klaus
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2017, 165 : 762 - 776