Integrating life cycle assessment and a farmer survey of management practices to study environmental impacts of peach production in Beijing, China

被引:2
|
作者
Li, Ziyue [1 ]
Chen, Yongliang [1 ]
Meng, Fanlei [1 ]
Shao, Qi [1 ]
Heal, Mathew R. [2 ]
Ren, Fengling [1 ]
Tang, Aohan [1 ]
Wu, Jiechen [3 ]
Liu, Xuejun [1 ]
Cui, Zhenling [1 ]
Xu, Wen [1 ]
机构
[1] China Agr Univ, Coll Resources & Environm Sci, Natl Acad Agr Green Dev, Key Lab Plant Soil Interact,Minist Educ,Natl Obse, Beijing 100193, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Edinburgh, Sch Chem, Joseph Black Bldg,David Brewster Rd, Edinburgh EH9 3FJ, Midlothian, Scotland
[3] KTH Royal Inst Technol, Dept Sustainable Dev Environm Sci & Engn SEED, SE-10044 Stockholm, Sweden
基金
中国国家自然科学基金; 国家重点研发计划;
关键词
Peach production; Life cycle assessment; Environmental emission mitigation; Nutrient management; Farming practice; Peri-urban agriculture; FRUIT-QUALITY; MAIZE PRODUCTION; FERTILIZER USE; CROP LOAD; YIELD; SYSTEMS; APPLE; IRRIGATION; EFFICIENCY; POLLUTION;
D O I
10.1007/s11356-022-19780-0
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
While intensive peach production has expanded rapidly in recent years, few studies have explored the environmental impacts associated with specific regional systems or the optimal management strategies to minimize associated environmental risks. Here, data from a survey of 290 native farmers were used to conduct a life cycle assessment to quantify the acidification potential (AP), global warming potential (GWP), eutrophication potential (EP), and reactive nitrogen (Nr) losses in peach production in Pinggu District, Beijing. Total annual Nr losses, and GWP, AP, and EP values for peach production in Pinggu District were respectively 10.7 kg N t(-1), 857 kg CO2-eq t(-1), 12.9 kg SO2-eq t(-1), and 4.1 kg PO4-eq t(-1). The principal driving factors were fertilizer production, transportation, and application, which together accounted for 94%, 67%, 75%, and 94% of Nr losses, GWP, AP, and EP, respectively. In the high yield, high nitrogen-use efficiency (HH) group, relative values of Nr losses, GWP, AP, and EP were respectively 33%, 25%, 39%, and 32% lower than the overall averages for 290 orchards. Further analyses indicate that improved farming practices such as decreasing application rates of fertilizers, increasing proportion of base fertilization rate, and proper fertilization frequency in the HH group were the main reasons for these orchards' better performance in peach yields and partial factor productivity of nitrogen fertilizer, and their reduced environmental impacts. These results highlight the need to optimize nutrient management in peach production in order simultaneously to realize both environmental sustainability and high productivity in the peach production system.
引用
收藏
页码:57190 / 57203
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Integrating life cycle assessment and a farmer survey of management practices to study environmental impacts of peach production in Beijing, China
    Ziyue Li
    Yongliang Chen
    Fanlei Meng
    Qi Shao
    Mathew R. Heal
    Fengling Ren
    Aohan Tang
    Jiechen Wu
    Xuejun Liu
    Zhenling Cui
    Wen Xu
    Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2022, 29 : 57190 - 57203
  • [2] Life Cycle Assessment for highlighting environmental hotspots in Sicilian peach production systems
    Ingrao, Carlo
    Matarazzo, Agata
    Tricase, Caterina
    Clasadonte, Maria Teresa
    Huisingh, Donald
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2015, 92 : 109 - 120
  • [3] Integrating Protein Quality and Quantity with Environmental Impacts in Life Cycle Assessment
    Berardy, Andrew
    Johnston, Carol S.
    Plukis, Alexandra
    Vizcaino, Maricarmen
    Wharton, Christopher
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2019, 11 (10):
  • [4] Life cycle environmental and economic assessment of ceramic tile production: A case study in China
    Ye, Liping
    Hong, Jinglan
    Ma, Xiaotian
    Qi, Congcong
    Yang, Donglu
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2018, 189 : 432 - 441
  • [5] Life cycle assessment of alfalfa production and potential environmental improvement measures in Northwest China
    Wang, Xiaoqin
    Ledgard, Stewart
    Luo, Jiafa
    Chen, Yan
    Tian, Yanqin
    Wei, Zhibiao
    Liang, Dongli
    Ma, Lin
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2021, 304 (304)
  • [6] Evaluating the environmental impacts of an urban wetland park based on emergy accounting and life cycle assessment: A case study in Beijing
    Duan, N.
    Liu, X. D.
    Dai, J.
    Lin, C.
    Xia, X. H.
    Gao, R. Y.
    Wang, Y.
    Chen, S. Q.
    Yang, J.
    Qi, J.
    ECOLOGICAL MODELLING, 2011, 222 (02) : 351 - 359
  • [7] Comparative analysis of methods for integrating various environmental impacts as a single index in life cycle assessment
    Ji, Changyoon
    Hong, Taehoon
    ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REVIEW, 2016, 57 : 123 - 133
  • [8] Environmental impacts of extensive beef production in Colombia by life cycle assessment: a case study
    Arcila, Sara
    Correa, Natalia
    Pachón, Sebastián
    Valderrama, Luis Giraldo A.
    Cano-Londoño, Natalia A.
    Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2024, 31 (43) : 55720 - 55735
  • [9] The environmental impacts of commercial poultry production systems using life cycle assessment: a review
    Kheiralipour, Kamran
    Rafiee, Shahin
    Karimi, Mahmoud
    Nadimi, Mohammad
    Paliwal, Jitendra
    WORLDS POULTRY SCIENCE JOURNAL, 2024, 80 (01) : 33 - 54
  • [10] Environmental impacts of pepper (Capsicum annuum L) production affected by nutrient management: A case study in southwest China
    Wang, Xiaozhong
    Zou, Chunqin
    Zhang, Yueqiang
    Shi, Xiaojun
    Liu, Jizhen
    Fan, Shanshan
    Liu, Yumin
    Du, Yunfei
    Zhao, Qingyue
    Tan, Yangguo
    Wu, Chaolong
    Chen, Xinping
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2018, 171 : 934 - 943